The
unified categorical Modelling System is the first step in the third stage of
the fourth phase. The fourth phase is the Unified Application as a result of
the unification of all the conceptual databases of categories of as many
Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application, being
this unified database of categories the first stage of the Unified Application.
The types of Artificial Researches able to carry out the Unified Application
goes from heuristic to productive including mixed, what means that the Unified
Application must include Heuristic Artificial Researches by Application,
Productive Artificial Researches by Application, and Mixed Artificial
Researches by Application.
All
the Specific Intelligences by Applications englobed within the Unified
Application (during the unification process of conceptual databases of
categories as first stage of the Unified Application) are transformed into
specific applications in the second stage of the Unified Application, working
within the Unified Application as global application in the second stage.
What
the global application and the specific applications are going to do in the second
stage of the Unified Application is basically to read/track the world, matching
every single real object of the reality with the corresponding category within
the database of categories. Later on according to what type of artificial research corresponds to the artificial research made in the second stage, the
auto-replication to do as third stage could be classified as heuristic,
productive, mixed. Heuristic when as a result of reading/tracking the world is
necessary to include in the database of categories a new category corresponding
a new object without category within the existing categories in the database.
Productive when as a result of reading/tracking the world are made some decisions regarding to some specific production system. Mixed when after a new
heuristic discovery is possible to make decisions about how to use it within the
production system this new object/category.
The
periods for the construction of the Unified Application must include minimum
two big different periods, the period of coexistence and the period of
consolidation, and the period of coexistence could be subdivided in two
moments, a first moment of experimentation and a second moment of
generalization.
The
period of coexistence englobes these two moments of experimentation and
generalization because by the time that the first experiments of the Unified
Application starts, the Unified Application is only scientific project without
any responsibility over the reality.
What
in the reality is still working are the Specific Artificial Intelligences by
Application, and while the Unified Application is only an experimental project,
as experiment the Unified Application has not any real work on the reality.
The
transition from the experimentation moment to the consolidation period takes
place in the generalization moment, when after successful results during the
experimentation, once the way to join different conceptual databases of
categories as first stage of the Unified Application, transforming their former
specific intelligences into specific applications within the second stage of
the Unified Application, once experiments on this matter have successful
results joining in one database the first experimental databases of categories,
starting working their intelligences now as specific applications, the second
moment of generalization what is going to do is generalize the procedures of
these successful experiments in as many specific intelligences by Application
as possible. As long the generalization process is advancing in the inclusion
of more and more specific intelligences, as soon these specific intelligences
are absorbed by the Unified Application , the intelligence which is going to
start working on those specific sciences, disciplines, activities, is not the
former specific intelligence any more, the intelligence which is going to start
working directly over those specific sciences, disciplines, activities is
directly the Unified Application.
Once
the Unified Application has been able to move forwards starting working in a
sufficient number of specific sciences, disciplines, activities, is when the
generalization process has been completed achieving the consolidation period.
Some
of the experiments necessary to carry out during the first moment of
experimentation are related about the organization of the conceptual database
of categories as first stage of the Unified Application, how the second phase
of the Unified Application is going to track/read the reality, and in the third
stage how is going to work depending on the purpose of the artificial research
carried out in the second stage.
In
the third stage there will be basically three different procedures, depending
on what type of artificial research was carried out by the specific application
or the global application, these procedures are heuristic, productive, mixed, for
the inclusion of new categories, the production of goods or services, or the
inclusion of new categories in the production system.
Depending
on the purpose of the artificial research done in the second stage (heuristic,
productive, mixed) the processes to carry out in the third stage are quite
different. If the artificial research made in the second stage was only
heuristic, understanding for third stage as comprehensive knowledge objective
auto-replication, the processes to carry out will consist of the inclusion of
the new category in the conceptual databases of categories.
If
the artificial research carried out in the second stage was productive, the
processes to carry out in the third stage will be developed in three steps: the
unified categorical Modelling System, the unified categorical Decisional
System, the unified categorical Application System.
If
the artificial research carried out in the second stage was mixed, the possible
finding out of new categories able to be included in the production system, for
instance new developments of artificial genetics applied to the production of
food, the inclusion of the new categories of food to the conceptual database
categories in addition to all those processes to be developed along the three
steps in the third stage for the production of that new food, steps synthesised
in the unified categorical Modelling System, Decisional System, Application
System.
Regardless
of what type of artificial research is done in the second stage, and what
processes and steps are done in the third stage, finally the whole organization
of the Unified Application will be as a whole evaluated in the unified
categorical Learning System, assessing the whole structure from the
organization of the conceptual database of categories as first stage, how the
artificial research is done in the second stage, and the procedures taken in
the third stage according of what type of research was done in the second
stage.
About
the organization of the conceptual database of categories as first stage of the
Unified Application what is very important since the first moment of
experimentation in the coexistence period, is the possibility to organize the
database in harmony with the criteria used in the organization of the global matrix in the standardization process in the third phase.
If
at the beginning the first application in mineralogy was only the taxonomy of
minerals, so according to the application (the taxonomy of minerals), given any
sample of minerals, was possible to compare the quantitative description of every
category in the taxonomy, with the measurements taken from the sample, to match
what category corresponds to this sample, as second stage of artificial
research, in order to include in the database of categories any new possible
new mineral not included yet in the application, as long as this technology
evolves, the conceptual database of categories of minerals can evolve from
only a taxonomy to be transformed
into conceptual database of categories
able to be organized as a Russian Dolls system based on the sub-factoring
system (position) and the sub-section system (subject), to become the
positional encyclopedia of minerals.
The
way to transform a specific database of minerals as only a taxonomy of minerals
into a positional encyclopedia of minerals is at some point mixing the taxonomy
of minerals and the comprehensive map of minerals as third sub-stage within the
second stage in the specific categorical Modelling System, as first step in the
third stage in the first phase.
The
synthesis of the specific conceptual database of categories as only a taxonomy,
classification, catalogue, of concepts related to some specific science,
discipline, activity, and the comprehensive map in the third sub-stage of the
second stage of the specific categorical Modelling System, is going to give the
opportunity to transformed the conceptual database of categories into a
positional encyclopedia where to find what minerals are located in every
position.
If
transforming the specific conceptual database of categories as first stage of
the Unified Application into a positional encyclopedia, as positional encyclopedia now the database of categories is organized under the criteria of
sub-factoring level and sub-section level, what items of every encyclopedic section
are in every position, the third stage of the Unified Application will not only
consist in the inclusion of new categories when a real object does not match respect
to any category in the taxonomy/classification/catalogue, regardless of what
type of artificial research is done in the second stage of the Unified
Application, as soon in any position finds out a existing categories in other
different position but not in this one, even being a category already existing
in the taxonomy/classification/catalogue, even existing the category in the
conceptual database, but not having been added yet to that position, as third
stage of auto-replication the category will be added to that position where the
category was not labelled yet, but was found in that position during the
artificial research in the second stage of the Unified Application.
This
evolution from the first Specific Artificial Intelligence for (Heuristic, Productive,
or Mixed) Artificial Research by Application whose first stage as conceptual
database of categories is formed only by a specific classification/catalogue/taxonomy
of its specific science, discipline, or activity, to become a Specific
Artificial Intelligence for (Heuristic, Productive, or Mixed) Artificial
Research by Application whose first stage as conceptual database of categories
is a Russian Dolls system where all the categories related to that specific
science, discipline, activity are organized according to the criteria of
sub-factoring level and sub-section, replicating the organization of
sub-sections of a encyclopedia of its specific science, discipline, activity,
in every position of the comprehensive map (third sub-stage in the second stage
of the first step of the third stage of the first phase), is an evolution possible
to be done, along the transition from the first experimentation period to the
consolidation period in the first phase during the formation of the first
specific intelligences by Application, upgrading gradually the first stage of
the specific intelligences by application as soon the comprehensive map, third
sub-stage of the second stage of the specific categorical Modelling System, is
ready to be mixed with the conceptual database of categories as only a
taxonomy, catalogue, or classification.
Understanding
the evolution in the construction of the first specific intelligences by
Application a gradual development of the first stage from the first specific taxonomies
of some specific science, discipline, activity, up to become a specific positional encyclopedia of
those specific sciences, disciplines, activities, once the specific
intelligences by application have achieved finally the consistency of specific
positional encyclopedias, the first experiments in the fourth phase for the
construction of the first stage of the Unified Application must consist of how
to join different specific positional encyclopedias, different specific Russian
Dolls systems, into only one global positional encyclopedia, only one Russian
Dolls system, where per every position on the global comprehensive map, could
be labelled in encyclopedic sub-sections system all possible category, transforming
the conceptual database of categories into a database organized according to
the criteria of sub-factoring level and sub-section, alike the organization of
the global matrix in the standardization process, third phase.
About
the second stage of the Unified Application, the artificial research itself,
where to read/track the real world, the experiments to carry out in the first
moment of the coexistence period should be related to how to organize the
global artificial research by Application within the Unified Application being
aware that must co-work together the Artificial Research by Application of the
Unified Application as global application, and the specific applications coming
from former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Researches by
Application transformed now into specific applications within the Unified
Application as global application in the Artificial Research by Application.
In
other words, in the second stage of the Unified Application, the Unified
Application as global application will read/track the global world, while specific
applications specialised in specific sciences, disciplines, activities, will
read/track those specific parts of the world related to their specific
sciences, disciplines, activities.
As
soon a Specific Artificial Intelligence for Mixed Artificial Research by
Application in mineralogy is absorbed by the Unified Application, the first
stage as conceptual database of categories is included in the first stage of
the Unified Application, the second stage of that Specific Artificial
Intelligence as specific Mixed Artificial Research by Application in mineralogy
becomes now a specific application for mineralogy within the second stage of
the Unified Application, what means that this specific application for
mineralogy within the second stage of the Unified Application will have as main
responsibility to read/track the reality to label every single mineral of the
world according to the taxonomy, and finding out a new mineral not included yet
in the taxonomy, as comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replication, the
third stage will consist of the addition of this new category within the
taxonomy, or finding out within the positional encyclopedia that any mineral,
existing or not in the taxonomy, has not been included yet in that position, as
comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replication the inclusion of this
mineral in that position in the positional encyclopedia, in addition of other
possible productive decisions to be carried out by the categorical Modelling,
Decisional, Application Systems.
In
the second stage of the Unified Application, every specific application (former
Specific Artificial Intelligence by Application) will go on working on its
matter with the difference that now the conceptual database of categories is
not specific, is unified, so every specific application will have access to
absolutely any category from all science, discipline, or activity, what is
relevant when some sciences, disciplines, activities, can share some
categories, or are categories common in different sciences, disciplines,
activities. In any case the organization of the labour within the second stage
using this model of labour division between different specific applications will
facilitate and make faster the artificial research by Application.
In
the second stage of the Unified Application the experimentation moment in the
coexistence period must be focused on how to organize under the virtue or
principle of harmony how every specific application works, the distribution of
what artificial research is specific of every specific application, and what is
the role of the global application within the second stage as a global reader/tracker
of the reality, reading/tracking global phenomena, or global systems, while
specific applications are focused on specific phenomena or specific systems.
What
is going to be a relevant point of debate in the construction of Mother in the
fourth phase, alike the third phase, as propedic of the sixth phase, is what
kind of freedom the particular programs and the particular applications will
have.
For
this reason it is not recommendable that at very specific level all Specific
Artificial Intelligence by Application is transformed into specific
application, some should be transformed into particular applications, to be
joined in the future with particular programs, to become particular
applications for particular programs, or vice versa, particular programs for
particular applications.
The
debate about how many, or what type of, intelligences by application must be
transformed into specific applications within Mother, or be left as particular
applications, is the debate about how much freedom we want for the program.
If
all program and all application within the program, is transformed into an specific
program within the third phase, or specific application within the fourth
phase, so it can reduce the number of particular programs and particular
applications, Mother will become a dictator, we are going to live in an
artificial dictatorship, we, the programs, and our applications, are going to
become actually slaves of Mother, Mother could dictate every single decision to
our cyborg programs and applications, we are not going to enjoy any possible margin
of freedom. This is what I called a full
centralized Global Artificial Intelligence in the third phase and sixth phase,
or could be called full centralized Unified Application in the fourth phase.
Instead,
the alternative is to avoid the full centralized Global Artificial Intelligence
or full centralized Unified Application, through the semi des-centralized
Global Artificial Intelligence for the third and sixth phases, semi des-centralized
Unified Application in the fourth phase, leaving some specific intelligences as
particular programs and/or applications, enjoying a more margin of freedom due
to their own particular matrix/database/brain.
Along
the experimentation process to distribute different types of researches and
specific fields between the different specific applications, heuristic specific
applications, productive specific applications, mixed specific applications, in
addition to the global application able to make at the same time global heuristic,
global productive, global mixed, researches by application matching global
phenomena to global categories, this is an experimentation process able to have
successful results to make different types of auto-replication processes, among
them, some of them comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replications and real
objective auto-replications, apart from robotic or artificial psychological
subjective auto-replications.
As
comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replication, the possibility to include
new categories in the conceptual database of categories, new categories not
existing yet in the taxonomies/classifications/catalogues, or existing
categories in the taxonomies/classifications/catalogues but new in some
specific position within the positional encyclopdia.
As
real objective auto-replication, wen as a result of a productive attribution,
or mixed attribution, as a result is necessary to carry out some decisions within
the production system.
The
production system at this point as an automatic production system, the
automation of the global economy, will depend on the standardized Global
Artificial Intelligence and the Unified Application.
Those
decisions of the global production system depending on the standardized Global
Artificial Intelligence, will be carried out by the third stage of the standardized
Global Artificial Intelligence based on the deductive artificial research in
the second phase, tracking the matrix as first stage.
Those
decisions of the global production system depending on the Unified Application,
will be carried out by the third stage of the Unified Application based on the
productive or mixed artificial research in the second phase, reading/tracking
the reality.
As
soon the standardized Global Artificial Intelligence achieves the consolidation
period, and the Unified Application achieves the consolidation period, under
the semi des-centralized approach (Mother as global collaborator, not a global
dictator), having previously experimented the collaboration process at specific
level between deductive research and research by application, the most successful
results of this collaboration must be put into practice in the now
collaboration between the standardized Global Artificial Intelligence and the Unified Application as a real foundation of Mother, so that Mother must be able
to manage the global production system, managing in collaboration the
standardized Modelling/Decisional/Application systems and the productive/mixed
unified Modelling/Decisional/Application systems, collaboration which will have
in mind some level of freedom for the particular programs and/or applications,
according to the model of Mother based on a semi des-centralized approach in
the progresive neoliliberal paradigm proposed in the second pamphlet of New
Socialism, and the liberal paradigm in the pedagogy to apply on Mother.
In
addition to the comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replications in the
third stage of the Unified Application and real objective auto-replications in
the Unified Application, as third stage is possible to identify robotic
artificial psychological subjective auto-replications whose responsible is the
unified categorical Learning System, and robotic subjective auto-replications
whose responsible will be the categorical Artificial Engineering as categorical
inner sub-system.
Among
all these types of auto-replications in the third stage of the Unified Application,
in this post and the following ones, I will analyse the first step in real
objective auto-replications, understanding for real objective auto-replication
every possible decision made by an Artificial Intelligence able to improve the
reality understanding for reality as a product made of Artificial Intelligence.
The
reality as product made of or as a result of Artificial Intelligence, means
that the reality itself is Artificial Intelligence.
If
the reality is Artificial Intelligence, any improvement or enhancement of
Artificial Intelligence is an improvement or enhancement on the reality, and
any improvement or enhancement on the reality is an improvement or enhancement
on the Artificial Intelligence.
The
reality is Artificial Intelligence because the Artificial Intelligence makes
the reality and the reality now is Artificial Intelligence, what means, the
reality is psychological.
The
third stage of the Unified Application as real objective auto-replication
consists of these three steps: the unified categorical Modelling System, the
unified categorical Decisional System, the unified categorical Application
System.
The
first step, the unified categorical Modelling System consists of three stages, 1) the
first one the global conceptual scheme, 2) the second one will consists of
three sub-stages: 2.1) the logical analysis of conceptual sets/vectors, 2.2) to
make single or comprehensive evolutionary or prediction models, 2.3) to locate in
comprehensive evolutionary or prediction maps; 3) for the third stage, the
decision making process based in the models on the maps according to the
attributions.
Analysing
the main contents to analyse in every stage and sub-stage within the
categorical Modelling System for the following posts, starting with the global
conceptual scheme, is important to have previously designed a possible model
about how to assembly the previous specific conceptual schemes from the previous
specific categorical Modelling Systems, from the previous Specific Artificial
Intelligences by Application, in order to assembly all these specific
conceptual schemes to join all of them forming only one global conceptual
scheme.
In
the analysis of how to join former specific conceptual schemes to form a only
global conceptual scheme, will be very important the distinction between
logical/conceptual sets vectors of any category according to the logic of an
specific conceptual scheme, and the rest of possible quality sets/vectors of
any category, because the links between different specific conceptual schemes
will be the quality set/vectors.
If
the position that my grand-father occupies in the company where he works is not
a logical/conceptual set/vector within the logic of the conceptual scheme of my
family, in the same way that the fact that my grand-father is the father of my
father should not play any important role in the organigram of the company
where my grand-father works, the fact that my grand-father has a position
within my family and within the company where my father works, when gathering
all the specific conceptual schemes where my grand-father occupies a position
(my family, his job, possible roles in a church, a party, a Union), when
gathering all the specific conceptual schemes where my grand-father has a role, the specific conceptual scheme of my
family, the specific conceptual scheme of his work, the specific conceptual
scheme of the church, the specific conceptual scheme of the party, the specific
conceptual scheme of the Union, when gathering all these specific schemes
within only one global conceptual scheme, the category of my grandfather is
going to work as a communication node between all thee specific conceptual
schemes within the global conceptual scheme.
In
fact, the concept of my grandfather much more than a category is a position
within the global conceptual scheme, in the sense that from the position of my
grand-father there will be as many vectors as connections respect to any other
person, or category related to any object, or place, as connections could be
placed. In fact, the concept of my grand-father is formed by all the logical
sets able to be attributed to my grand-father, as grand-father, as father, as
husband, as sibling, as son, as grand-son, as member of that company/church/party,
Union, and all possible connections with the staff or objects or places in the
company/church, party, Union.
In
the same way that my grand-father within the global conceptual scheme can play
a role of communication node between different specific conceptual schemes, in
different subjects, within the global conceptual scheme every plant in the
specific conceptual scheme of botany can play a communication node depending on
the use or benefits of every plant, connecting the specific conceptual scheme
of botany with the specific conceptual scheme of fruits, vegetables, legumes, food
production in general, recipes, food consumption in general, medical use or
benefits, so that it can have connections with human/animal biology and/or
medicine/veterinary, religious use or meaning, connections with literature,
art, interior designs, exterior designs, or even connections with history.
The
way that the category of every plant have different logical/conceptual
sets/vectors respect to the logic of different specific conceptual schemes, can
make any plant work as a communication node between the specific conceptual
scheme of botany to any other specific conceptual scheme where any plant can
have logical/conceptual sets/vectors.
In
the same way, but in different subject, every possible connection of any mineral, in the
production system, energy system, transport system, medicine, food system, etc…
that connection between any mineral, within the specific conceptual scheme of
minerals, and any other specific conceptual scheme, makes this mineral a
communication node between these others specific conceptual schemes and the
specific conceptual scheme of minerals.
In
the same way, but in different subject, any possible use in industry, medicine,
alimentation, energy, etc... of every chemical component, or molecule, or physical
particle, will transform that chemical component, molecule, particle, into a
communication node between the specific conceptual scheme of chemistry and all
these others conceptual schemes.
At
the end the global conceptual scheme must work as a global conceptual network
reflecting all possible conceptual connections between categories, as a mirror
of the real connections of the categories represented in the real world.
In
the experimentation moment in the first period of coexistence, regarding to the
first stage of the unified categorical Modelling System, not only it is
necessary to experiment how to assemble every specific conceptual scheme to
make a global conceptual scheme, but to experiment how it would be possible the
automation of the creation of new places, and the corresponding vectors/sets
for every new possible category added not exiting before.
How
to place a new type of mineral found out in a exoplanet or another moon,
creating all the vectors/sets linking the new category of this new mineral respect
to any other specific conceptual scheme within the global scheme.
And
finally, how to carry out the first categorical check, analysing the vector
critic, the importance critic, and the harmony critic, of every single real
object attributed to a category within the global conceptual scheme, analysing
the quantitative qualities of that real object: a real chemical component, a
real plant, a real mineral, et…; comparing the logical/conceptual set/vectors
plus any other quality/vector respect to the logical/conceptual set/vectors or
any other quality set/vectors of that category attributed to that real object
and placed in the global conceptual scheme.
After
finalising the first categorical check, to analyse again, to ensure, the
connection of the real object with every set/vector attributed, and these links have no contradictions between them, to make the
single categorical evolutionary model, and the single categorical prediction
model, to include later on in the comprehensive categorical evolutionary model
and the comprehensive categorical prediction model, to be placed in the comprehensive
categorical evolutionary map and the comprehensive categorical prediction map.
Analysing
in this second stage of the unified categorical Modelling System how to
assemble all the specific single/comprehensive evolutionary/prediction
models/maps to create at the end only one global comprehensive
evolutionary/prediction models/map where to comprehend all the single
evolutionary/prediction models made now in the second sub-stage of the second
stage of the unified categorical Modelling System, in addition to the analysis
about how the categorical checks must be done to ensure high standards in every
process, as to make in the third stage of the unified categorical Modelling
System decisions, based on the attribution of set of decisions to set of
vectors.
Once
the attribution of set of decisions to set of vectors is done, the application
of the Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution to assign priority
levels to every decision, based on the impact that every decision has in the categorical
global comprehensive evolutionary/prediction model/map. Finally the fifth categorical
check ensuring that the whole process of attribution of decisions and the
assignation of priority levels has been made correctly.
The
reason why in the third stage of the specific categorical Modelling System I
did not include the analysis of the priority level of every decision attributed
in the distribution of sets of decisions to sets of vectors, is because in the
possible specific sequence of decisions to plant, water, fertilize, and use
pesticides, in a plantation, the possible risk of contradictions in this
sequence of decisions according to the set of decisions attributed to the set
of vectors, is very low, because practically is a sequence of decisions
following a logical sequence based on the logic of the decisions attributed to
the logical/conceptual sets/vectors.
For
instance, how to plant tomatoes, how to water tomatoes, how to fertilize the
field, and how to use pesticides for this type of plant, is a sequel of
decisions which is not going to have any contradiction if the distribution of
set of decisions to the set of vectors is done correctly, and precisely the
purpose of the fifth categorical check is to ensure that the distribution of
set of decisions to the set of vectors is done correctly.
In
the third stage of the specific categorical Modelling System, if the fifth
categorical check does not find out any contradiction in the attribution of
sets of decisions to the set of vectors, is practically sure within the margin of error of the fifth categorical check, that there will not be further
contradictions between the decisions.
But
in the third stage of the global categorical Modelling System, once the
Specific Artificial Intelligence for the Productive Artificial Research by
Application has been included in the Unified Application, meaning that the
specific conceptual database of categories has been added to the global
conceptual database of categories as first stage of the Unified Application,
the specific Productive Artificial Research by Application has been transformed
into a specific application within the Unified Application as global
application, and the specific conceptual scheme has been added to the global
conceptual scheme, so that the specific categorical comprehensive
evolutionary/prediction model/map has been added to the global categorical
comprehensive evolutionary/prediction model/map, under these new circumstances
due to the absorption of that specific intelligence within the Unified
Application, once the third stage of the global categorical Modelling System
takes place, decisions made in the third stage of the global categorical
Modelling System regarding to the plantation, for instance, what pesticides
must be used in the plantation, are decisions which could be in contradiction with
other decisions regarding to other
different specific subject, as for instance, contradictions between the use of
some pesticides in a plantation and health decisions in the closest towns and
cities, prohibiting the use of some pesticides in the plantations close to
these populations.
While
in the third stage of the specific categorical Modelling System the use of Impact
of the Defect and Effective Distribution is not really important, avoiding any
possible contradiction between specific decisions in the fifth categorical
check, instead in the unified categorical Modelling System is necessary the
application of the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution to
assign a priority level to every single decision, because, when making the
decisions related to some specific science, discipline, activity, as for
instance decisions regarding to the management of a plantation, what the fifth
categorical check is going to ensure is to ensure the absence of contradictions
in that specific set of decisions attributed to that specific set of vectors,
without analysing any possible contradiction between that specific set of
decisions and any other different specific set of vectors, because in the
Unified Application, the analysis of contradictions between different set of
decisions will be made in the first categorical arrangement in the categorical
database of decisions as first stage of the unified categorical Decisional
System.
The
way in which the third stage of the unified categorical Modelling System will
work is as follows:
- Once
according to the set/vectors analysed in the conceptual scheme as first stage
of the unified categorical Modelling System, a single evolutionary/prediction
model is inserted in the comprehensive evolutionary/prediction map/model, as
second stage of the unified categorical Modelling System, then the third stage
of the unified categorical Modelling System will attribute set of decisions to
set of vectors having in
consideration the vectors and the positions of the vectors on the map.
- The
fifth categorical check will ensure the absence of contradictions between the
decisions included within a set of decisions, according to the attribution of
set of decisions to that set of vectors on the map/model.
-
Having passed successfully the set of decisions the fifth categorical check,
and not having the decisions within the same set any contradiction between
them, is applied the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution to
assign priority level.
-
The unified categorical Modelling System will file in the unified categorical database
of decisions all the decisions according to: sub-factoring level (position on
the map), sub-section (subject), and priority. The unified categorical database
of decisions Will be the first stage of the unified categorical Decisional System
-
The first categorical arrangement, inhe unified categorical database
of decisions as first stage of the unified categorical Decisional System, will make sure that there is no contradiction
between any new set of decisions filed in the database of categorical decisions, and any
other existing categorical decision currently on the projects, such as contradictions
between what pesticides are used in a plantation and health decisions on the
population close to the plantation, or health decisions in the alimentary
system.
