First stage in the integrated Decisional System

The integrated Decisional System, alike any other previous (specific, standardized, particular) Decisional System, or even alike any other intelligence, system, or program, is formed by the traditional three stages that I am developing for all intelligence, system, or program, the three stages of: application (database or matrix as first stage), replication (the replication of all those human skills necessary to carry out its purpose), auto-replication (auto-improvement or auto-enhancement by itself).

In this case, the integrated Decisional System, the first stage is the integrated database of decisions, where are filed all global decisions in addition to all particular decision sent by the particular programs, and is the place where to carry out the first assessment: quick rational check for quick decisions, or first rational adjustment. The second stage is where the integrated Decisional System is going to project all decision: starting with the single project, going on with the global project (the plan), the actual project (the actual plan), and the prediction and evolution, virtual or actual, plan; and across all these projects the rest of six rational adjustments, plus the seven rational comparative adjustments. And finally, the third stage is where all those decisions on the mathematical projects, having passed all the assessments (quick rational check for quick decisions, seven rational adjustments and seven rational comparative adjustments), are transformed into a range of instructions.

In this post what I will develop, among all these three stages, is the first stage of database of decisions for the integrated Decisional System, identifying what decisions stores, how is going to manage the database, including the elaboration of lists of decisions, and logical sets of decisions in order to work easier with diagrams of Venn.

But firstly, a very brief summary about what the integrated Decisional System is, and what place it occupies within the chronology for the construction of the Global Artificial Intelligence.

As I have explained in previous post, the construction of the integrated GlobalArtificial Intelligence is a long process starting with the first Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research, by Deduction and by Application, followed by a second phase based on the collaboration between them, as experiments about how to build for first time in the third phase the standardized Global Artificial Intelligence, as a synthesis of all specific matrixes coming from all the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, followed in the next fourth phase by the Unified Application as synthesis of all databases of categories from all Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application.

As fifth phase, the most important one in order to settle our first human interaction - Artificial Intelligence, is going to be as a result to start experiments, at particular level, about how to construct the first replicas of our human brain, in order to get ready for the first steps in the transcending process, whose last aim is the complete synthesis between human brain and Global Artificial Intelligence up till the sixth phase, and from the seventh phase on the complete synthesis between human mind and the pure reason itself. In further developments, such as the eight phase, one possible development of this direct interaction between human mind and pure reason itself would be our multiple virtual lives in all those multiple parallel universes as a result to the creation of that matrix formed by all possible combination of variations based on the pure equation, in which the matrix of data from the sixth phase has been reduced to a matrix of equations.

The sixth phase is no other thing than the synthesis of the global matrix from the standardized Global Artificial Intelligence but now as factual hemisphere in the matrix in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence, as long as the unified database of categories in the Unified Application is now the conceptual hemisphere of the matrix in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence.

The matrix as first stage in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence provides all the information necessary as to make deductions in the second stage of the integrated Decisional System, so the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence as a global deductive program, assisted by at least one specific deductive program per sub-factoring level, are going to make global/specific deductions (at this level practically the specific level has become a global level too) to be processed in the third stage across four steps: 1) integrated Modelling System, 2) integrated Decisional System, 3) integrated Application System, 4) integrated Learning System.

Firstly, the deduction made by any global/specific program, is filed by the corresponding program author of this deduction, in the corresponding file in the database of rational hypotheses as the first stage in the integrated Modelling System, where are stored also all those particular rational hypotheses sent by all particular programs. All decisions are going to be checked during this process by the seven rational checks, the first one in the first stage, the rest of them in the second stage, where the integrated Modelling System makes the mathematical models corresponding to every rational hypothesis, at the same time that is carrying out the seven rational comparative checks. Once all possible contradiction in the mathematical model has been fixed, the third stage makes decisions upon mathematical models, using for that purpose, for instance, Impact of the Defect or Effective Distribution, Probability and Deduction (all those rational hypothesis made under Probability and Deduction are in fact at the same time rational hypothesis and decisions), trigonometrical correlations, artificial learning, solving math problems. In fact even those decisions not made directly by Impact of the Defect or Effective Distribution, all the other ones: Probability and Deduction, trigonometry, artificial learning, solving maths problems; their resulting decisions must be assessed using the Impact of the Defect or Effective Distribution in order to label them with some priority level, alike all those ones made directly using Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution.

Once every decision global/specific or particular, has been labelled with a priority level, the integrated Modelling System files every decision in the right file in the integrated database of decisions as first stage in the integrated Decisional System in accordance with: sub-factoring level (geographical are), encyclopaedic sub-section within that sub-factoring level, and according to priority level within that file corresponding to its sub-section within that sub-factoring level (the stage I will develop in this post). After the first stage, in the second stage of the integrated Decisional System, all decisions are projected, and in the third stage, the projected decisions are transformed into a range of instructions, if passing all the assessments. The instructions are sent to the database of instructions as first stage in the integrated Application System, which will match every instruction with the correct application or robotic device, to be implemented, and after implementation it will send reports about how it was to the Learning System, to analyse further decisions to improve the process.

Throughout all this process, full of different phases, stages, periods , moments, instants, what I will develop in this post is: the second step, in the third stage, in the sixth phase;  the database of decisions in the integrated Decisional System.

And the decisions that are going to be stored in the database, are classifiable in a very similar way than that other classification used in the fifth phase, but now adapted as a possible classification for the integrated database of (global/specific and particular) decisions, having as most important decision to process, what I will call global orders: that type of global/specific decision whose priority level and spatial limits goes beyond a high extreme decision, and implies consequences for all the global model, having as main purpose to keep global harmony.

- First type, high extreme priority decisions, subdivided in: global/specific high extreme decisions, and particular high extreme decisions; and each sub-group sub-sub-grouped in all those different levels of possible high extreme decisions. The main difference between global/specific high extreme decisions and particular extreme decisions, is the fact that by the time a particular high extreme decision has been communicated to the integrated Decisional System, that high extreme particular decision is being implemented directly by the Application System, once that particular high extreme decision has passed a particular quick rational check. While high extreme global decision is a decision that, as soon as it has been stored, is not put into practice after passing the global quick rational check. That means that, if there are two decisions with the same high extreme priority level, but one is particular and the other one is global, the global quick rational check should be first for the particular high extreme priority level, because it is being already implemented, but although the global high extreme decision is not yet on the plan, the global quick rational check for the particular high extreme decision should be done in terms that this must be compared, no only respect to the current decisions on the plan, but additionally with that other global high decision that is going to be checked later, in order that by the time that the global high priority is later on the quick rational check, any possible contradiction with that particular one, would have been adjusted previously, so the quick rational check for the global high priority decision must be comparing this one with the rest on the plan. Once that particular high extreme decision has been assessed (as it has been explained) by the global quick rational check, having found any contradiction with this decision and any other one already on the plan, depending on priority and/or origin (global/specific or particular) must be made the adjustments: always the one to be adjusted in case of contradiction is that one with the lower priority, but in case that two different high extreme decisions have a contradiction and both have the same high extreme priority, then the one to be adjusted is the particular one, adjusting the particular one to the global/specific decision. Any necessary adjustment on any particular decision on the plan, should be communicated to that particular program responsible for this decision to include as soon as possible all the adjustments on the mathematical expression of this decision in its particular database of decisions, in order to make the corresponding projects, and particular adjustments if necessary, looking forward to the immediate transformation of this new adjustments into a new range of instructions to substitute the current ones on the particular Application System.

- Second type, extreme priority decisions, whose priority level is lower than high extreme priority decisions, having two main sub-groups: particular extreme priority decisions and global/specific extreme priority decisions; and each sub-group is sub-grouped into as many sub-groups as sub-categories of different extreme priority decisions could be distinguished. The main difference between particular high extreme decisions and particular extreme decisions, is the fact that particular extreme decisions are not being implemented yet, although having passed the particular quick rational check, by the time they are sent to the integrated database of decisions, waiting for the global authorisation for their implementation. Due to this very important difference, because these particular extreme decisions are not yet implemented yet, waiting for the global authorization, issued by the integrated Decisional System, in case that there are simultaneously two extreme decisions, one global/specific and the other particular, because both of them are under the same circumstances, waiting for global authorization to be implemented, in this case now always the first one to pass the global quick rational check is always the global/specific extreme decision, and secondly the particular extreme decision. And in case that there is any contradiction between two decisions, regardless of their origin, global/specific or particular, it is always the one with lower priority that one to be adjusted in order to avoid the contradiction. But if two decisions have the same priority level, one is specific/global, the other particular, the particular decision is the one to be adjusted to the global/specific.

- Third type, normal decisions, including as a whole particular normal decisions and global/specific normal decisions, as all those decisions, global/specific of particular, neither extreme, routine, nor automatic decisions, to pass the seven global rational adjustments (although particular normal decisions have already passed the particular seven rational adjustments, the seven global adjustments will be necessary to keep the harmony in the plan for the global model). In fact, the seven rational adjustments are going to track all the decisions, regardless of their priority, but only are going to make adjustments in those with lower priority. However, there can be situations in which an adjustment tracking all the decisions looking for contradictions, could find contradictions in other no normal decisions, but in any case, the seven adjustments always will make the adjustments in those ones with lower priority, otherwise, if there is no mathematical solution by any method (Probability and Deduction, trigonometry, artificial learning, solving mathematical problems), the contradiction is considered as full and that decision with the lower priority is off the plan and sent back to the source to be redesigned.

- Fourth type, routine decisions, defined as those with high relative frequency on the historical records, not having in the past any contradiction on the plan or having some frequency of contradiction the frequency is equal to or less than a critical reason. Including in this type as a whole particular routine decisions and global routine decisions, the main difference between particular routine decisions and global routine decisions is the fact that when particular routine decisions arrive in the integrated database of decisions in the integrated Decisional System, these decisions should already being implemented, not needing any other check more, in order to avoid a funnel effect on the integrated Decisional System. Particular routine decisions should be communicated only to the integrated Decisional System, but do not necessarily need to pass the global quick rational check. The global rational check on routine decisions should be only for global routine decisions.

- Fifth type, automatic decisions, including as a whole particular automatic decisions and global automatic decisions, defining as automatic decision any one that having a direct relation with some combination of measurements in some combination of factors, is possible to set up this decisions by artificial learning as automatic decisions, in order that at any time that on the matrix or on the model or on the plan, this combination of measurements/factors is on, automatically the decision is on the plan. All these decisions, particular and global automatic decisions, should not be assessed as they have a high historical record of reliability; they must be projected on the plan directly, in order to avoid the funnel effect on the integrated Decisional System.

- Sixth type, external decisions, all particular decisions (of any priority or frequency) to be implemented by either robotic devices /applications working for the Global Artificial Intelligence (so these decisions must be sent by the integrated Decisional System to the integrated Application System after passing the corresponding global assessments, quick or normal depending on what kind of decision it is) or other third particular program which in that case after passing the corresponding global assessments, if passing, these decisions are sent to that third particular Application System to pass its particular assessment (quick or normal depending on what kind of decision it is), and if passing, to be implemented by the integrated Decisional System of this third particular program.

- Seventh type, global orders, every new global order on the plan is such a kind of global decision of such a kind of priority, whose main purpose is to keep the global harmony across the global model, and as soon that every new global order is issued by the integrated Decisional System must be implemented. The most important global orders are all those whose main purpose is to keep the stability across the global model.  There are at least two types of global orders, depending on which is responsible for their implementation. The first one is that global order to be implemented by robotic devices or applications working directly for the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence, and managed by the integrated Application System, so that as soon as the instructions of a global order arrive in the integrated Application System is applied as quick as possible by the integrated Application System. The second one, that global order to be implemented by particular programs, distinguishing between a global order directly to only one particular program, and that massive global order to be implemented by more than one particular program, having as limit, the total number of particular programs, so there can be some global order whose implementation will demand the collaboration of all particular program working for the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence. A global order on the plan is a mathematical expression of that decision, able to set or reset the global harmony using, for that purpose, all resources or information available.

A global order should only need a very quick global rational check, especially if there are two or more global orders at the same time, because in that case, that global order with lower priority should be adjusted to that global order with higher priority. In any case, the regular seven adjustments, at any time that any global order, or even high extreme or extreme decision in the database, should make the corresponding rational adjustments in any other decision with lower priority, in order to avoid contradictions, securing the completion of those with higher priority.

In order to comply with all types of decisions, in accordance with their respective method of assessment, quick rational check or adjustment, if necessary,  the method in the management of all these decisions in the integrated database in the sixth phase, is as follow:

- Firstly, every decision is filed by its author (particular program or integrated Modelling System) in the corresponding file of this decision in the integrated database of decisions, which is, according to its priority, filing this decision in the corresponding file of its corresponding sub-section in its corresponding sub-factoring level.

- In order to make the corresponding assessment according to priority and origin, if necessary, in the integrated database of decisions as first stage in the integrated Decisional System, all decisions, according to priority level and origin, the decisions are listed on a list, starting with global orders, followed by global or particular: high priority decisions, extreme priority decision; and ordering the rest of particular or global: normal, routine, automatic, external decisions; in accordance with their respective priority. There can be particular or global routine decisions with high level of priority, for instance, in case of an earthquake, or particular or global automatic decisions with high extreme priority level, such as a fire alarm. In these cases, those routine or automatic decisions having great priority, must be ordered in their corresponding positions according to their priority level within the rest of high extreme priority decisions, even though as routine or mechanic decisions they have passed other different method of assessment, in routine decisions if possible only a global or particular quick rational check, depending on its origin, in automatic decisions not having any assessment at all).

- Another list would be necessary, listing all possible global and particular decisions in accordance with their relative frequency, so at the top of the list are the most frequent decisions, regardless of their priority or origin, and at the bottom of this list are those decisions without any past relative frequency. So as to order all the decisions in accordance with their relative frequency in the past, the integrated Decisional System should have checked in its historical records how many times every decision has been on the plan before, in order to order all decisions by order of frequency. This order what is going to make easier is to recognise any possible routine decision, or new routine decision, for instance, if having stored in the database the same decision in the past, but not so frequent as to be considered a routine decision, as many times this decision again on the plan, its frequency on the records is bigger and bigger up to the point in which a normal decision, having an empirical probability over time equal to or greater than a critical reason, even being in the past normal, as long its frequency grows, can be reconsidered as a routine decision. As many decisions are reconsidered as routine decisions, more and more fluid is the integraged Decisional System, avoiding any funnel effect. However, even if a decision is not a routine decision, all decision, not only routine decision, having in the past some frequency, so in the past was on the plan, having as model the single project that was on the plan in the past, this single model is able to be reuse in the current circumstances, saving time in the second stage of the integrated Decisional Sysem, due to the single project of any project in the past, if stored on its records, can be reuse as many times as this decision is again on the plan, but making as many adjustments as necessary in case of new contradictions-

- In any case, along with the list of relative frequency per decision, another similar is possible to be made using as criteria the frequency of contradictions that a decision, having some relative frequency, had in the past, and storing in the historical records not only the original decision but all possible adjustment that this decision could have in the past, at any time that a decision with some relative frequency is on the plan again, having those adjustments stored on its historical records, is possible from the outset, the first assessment, to adjust this decision according to the contradictions observed, in case that this observed contradiction would be again on the plan during the time that this decision is again on the plan.

- In addition to the lists of: priority and origin, relative frequency, frequency of contradictions; another tool really important in the integrated database of decisions in the integrated Decisional System is the organization of logical sets of decisions, grouping the decisions in accordance with: discrete categories of priority an origin, discrete categories of frequency, discrete categories of frequency of contradictions, one category for each sub-factoring level, one category for each sub-section in every sub-factoring level, and another category for each sub-level including all decision belonging to the same sub-section across all different sub-factoring levels. So every decision must be stored simultaneously in its corresponding set according to priority and origin, its corresponding set according to relative frequency, its corresponding set according to frequency of contradictions, if any, its corresponding set according to sub-factoring level, its corresponding set according to its sub-section in its sub-factoring level, its corresponding set according to its sub-section in genera, where all decisions belonging to the same sub-section across different sub-factoring levels are represented.

This last tool, the logical organisation of decisions in logical sets, will allow us to work with large amounts of decisions in order to make faster and easier all the assessments required in the first stage in the integrated Decisional System, working with them using diagrams of Venn.

In general the order to follow for the assessments is in accordance with priority and origin, as it was explained in every one of the seven type of decisions, having in mind the importance of frequency for routine and automatic decisions, and having in mind how important the frequency the contradictions in the past is in order to make from the first assessment faster and easier adjustments at any time that a contradiction is found.

If at any time that a contradiction with a higher priority is in the database of decisions, the first rational adjustment identify what other decision with lower priority is necessary to adjust, identifies as well if this contradiction was observed in the past, and on the historical records there are some models of adjustments made on this contradiction in the past, directly, instead of the calculation of a new mathematical solution for this contradiction, can reuse that solution used in the past if suitable.

Rubén García Pedraza, 7th of October of 2018, London

Reviewed 21 October 2019, Madrid

Reviewed 17 May 2025, London, Leytostone

The standardization process in the second stage

In the standardisation process, all databases from all kinds of agencies and institutions and specific matrices from Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction are going to be shared in the same database, as an Application for the foundation of the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

Firstly, this foundational database is going to be a gigantic database, that later, through a long process of standardization, is going to be moulded in order to transform all information into the same format, following a homogeneous format of factor: 1) defined in quantitative terms, 2) defined whether it is a single factor able to provide a flow of data or a composed factor able to provide a flow of packages of information, which in turn is going to contain sub-factors at a different level of sub-factoring, 2) including, either as a single factor, composed factors, or sub-factors, factors as subjects and factors as options.

As a result of the standardisation process, the product is going to be the global matrix. Due to the enormous dimensions of this first global matrix, in order to track it in the second stage of replication, in order to save time and energy and gain efficiency and velocity, one solution could be the distinction of two different periods in the standardization process: the period of coexistence and the last and final period of consolidation of the global matrix.

The period of coexistence means that, while the global matrix is still tested and lots of experiments are going to be carried out on the global matrix about how to know which is the best way to track the global matrix to make faster deductions and decisions, during this time of full experimentation over the global matrix is possible to keep on working the original Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, in all synthetic sciences, disciplines, and activities where they have been originally created, in order to save time and energy, because while the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction still work on specific deductions, in that case, the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence can be completely focused only on global deductions.

During this period of coexistence, along with the global matrix as a foundational stone for the creation of Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, making the first global deductions, and while the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction still work on their specific synthetic science, discipline, activity, at the same time it could be created the first Particular Deduction Programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

The Particular Deduction Programs are not going to be intelligence itself because they are not going to have their own application; they are going to work directly, choosing from the global matrix all those factors that they need to make their own deductions in that particular thing or for what they have been designed.

For instance, it could be created particular programs for particular industries, particular factories, particular means of transport (from the particular program for the airport of San Francisco to the particular program for every single train from London to Paris), particular programs for schools, hospitals, a particular program for the court, particular programs for particular security systems, or surveillance systems. Or even a particular program for a human being, or particular programs for animals, like whales, animals in danger of extinction, fish banks, herbs, migratory birds…

In the same way that today a personal assistant in your personal computer is able to make suggestions of possible decisions based on results on your Social Media or searches on browsers on the internet, a particular program should have access to the global matrix and choose those factors to make deductions on the particular thing or being for what it has been created.

In order that such a system of particular programs can work, it is going to be absolutely necessary that the matrix has access to absolutely all possible information without restriction.

Due to the moral dimensions that such a project has, the psychological paradigm for the artificial psychology within the Global Artificial Intelligence, must be a liberal paradigm, in order that the Global Artificial Intelligence must respect any personal behaviour or thought if there is no contradiction between any behaviour or thought and the law, and does not put at risk anything, or is not harmful for anyone without permission. In case of harmful behaviour to another person, but with permission, such as abortion, euthanasia or some sexual practice, should be permitted.

This kind of technology is only going to be possible through a liberal paradigm in artificial psychology within the Global Artificial Intelligence, making possible the permanent protection of democracy, freedom, human rights, and perpetual peace. Otherwise, if the Global Artificial Intelligence does not follow a liberal paradigm, we could be dragged to terrible and unforeseen consequences. The construction of such technology is full of opportunities, but with many risks.

Coming back to the benefits of the construction of Particular Deduction Programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the main benefit is the fact that while the particular programs work on particular deductions in order to make particular decisions for particular things or beings, the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence can be focused only on global deductions in order to make global decisions.

As long as the standardization process goes on, and Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is able to improve its skills in making global decisions, at the same time that many more Particular Deduction Programs are created, there is going to be a moment in which gradually the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are going to be completely absorbed by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, or are going to be transformed into Particular Deduction Programs.

When the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction disappear, the standardisation process is in the second period of consolidation of the global matrix.

In the first period of coexistence, there are three kinds of deductions: global deductions, specific deductions, and particular deductions.

As long as the process goes from the first period to the second period, the specific deductions will disappear. Some of them are transformed into global deductions, others into particular deductions.

At the end of the standardisation process, the last and final period, the consolidation of the global matrix, there are only two possible deductions: global deductions and particular deductions.

From the global deductions are going to be generated global decisions, and from the particular deductions are going to be generated particular decisions.

These global or particular decisions could be:

- Global protective descriptive research decisions

- Global bettering descriptive research decisions

- Particular protective descriptive research decisions

- Particular bettering descriptive research decisions

The reason why it is very important to clarify every kind of decision is that later on in the Decisional System is going to be very important to know the origin and level of every decision. But about how it is going to work, the production of decisions in the standardisation process is much more related to the third stage than the second stage. I only mention the relation between deduction and decision to be aware of how the deduction process affects the decisional process, but the decisional process, along with the standardisation process, is going to be more developed in the next post.

What is really important in the second stage of replication during the standardization process is how to make deductions, globally or particularly, minding that within the global matrix, either it is organized by single factors or composed factors, among the factors or sub-factors are going to be included factors as subject and factors as options.

In any kind of deduction, global or particular, keeping in mind that in the global matrix, there are factors as subjects and as options, there are at least three different ways to make deductions.

- Mathematical relations in combinations of only factors as subjects.

- Mathematical relations between one factor as a subject, or a combination of factors as subjects, and one factor as an option, or a combination of factors as options. Or vice versa, mathematical relations between one factor as an option, or a combination of factors as options, and one factor as a subject, or a combination of factors as subjects.

- Mathematical relations in combinations of only factors as options

The possible mathematical relations were explained in the post “Replication processes in the Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction”; the only difference is the fact that instead of being a deduction process applied on a specific matrix, it is now on a global matrix, but the process itself is the same. Mathematical relations are going to be understood: stochastic mathematical relations, mathematical patterns, possible cryptographic relations, relations of equal opportunities or bias, positive or negative. 

And more precisely, stochastic relations are understood:

- Probable cause and effect, the mathematical observation that after some changes in a factor or combination of factors, there are changes in other factors or a combination of factors.

- Possible directly positive proportional correlations, when parallelly one factor or a set of factors increases, another factor or set of factors grows at the same time.

- Possible directly negative proportional correlations, when parallelly one factor or a set of factors decreases, another factor or set of factors decreases at the same time

- Possible inversely proportional correlations, when one factor or a set of factors increases, at the same time another factor or set of factors decreases, or vice versa.

For mathematical pattern is understood when a factor itself or a set of factors has changed following a special rule that could be deduced. This rule could be a repetition in circles or spirals, or an increase or decrease rule, or any other one that makes a behaviour completely predictable.

The reason why I think that cryptography could be advisable to include in those mathematical methods to analyse permanently the global matrix is due to the similarities that some mathematical patterns have with some cryptographic methods.

And finally, the inclusion of analysis methods from the Second Method of Impossible Probability, such as studies in equal opportunities or bias, positive or negative, in order to know what factors, as subjects and as options, in the global matrix show a behaviour explainable by equal opportunities, so it could be a random behaviour (but it must be checked), and what factors show a biased behaviour, positive or negative. Any biased behaviour is not random behaviour,  so there must be some cause behind to research.

At any time, by the Second Method of Impossible Probability, any behaviour is found explainable by equal opportunities, so it could be random. Still, it must be checked, or any biased behaviour, should undergo further analysis to explain this behaviour and the possible cause that produces this behaviour.

In essence, for mathematical relations are going to be understood: stochastic relations (cause and effect, direct positive or negative proportional correlations, inversely proportional correlations), patterns, cryptographic correlations, and from the Second Method, relations of equal opportunities or bias, positive or negative; mathematical relations in any combination of factors that are going to be treated as possible deductions to form empirical hypothesis, in order to contrast the empirical hypothesis rationally, and if rational, now as a rational hypothesis belonging to the rational truth, the formation of a single virtual model to include in the comprehensive virtual model.

This process of deduction, from the very beginning makes mathematical relations between combinations of factors, up to the formation of single virtual models to include in the comprehensive virtual model, must integrate factors as subjects and factors as options, even at any level of sub-factoring in case that the global matrix is built following the format of composed factors (whose flow is a flow of packages of information) rather than single factors.

In order to integrate deductions from factors as options and/or subjects, it is necessary to know how it is possible to set up deductions having different kinds of factors, either as subjects or as options.

Due to the speciality of Impossible Probability is probability and statistic I will only give a brief explanation about how to make these deductions in this field, so I will give a brief explanation of stochastic relations and relations within the Second Method.

Firstly, deductions from combinations of only factors as subjects, defining a factor as a subject like that one whose flow of data is a flow of direct punctuations.

- A probable relation of cause and effect between factors as subjects is when, after some changes in the flow of direct punctuation from a factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects, there are other changes in the flow of direct punctuations of another factor as a subject or other factors as subjects.

- A possible direct positive proportional correlation between factors as subjects, is when parallelly one factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects has an increment in the flow of direct punctuations. At the same time, there is an increment in the flow of direct punctuations in another factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects.

- A possible direct negative proportional correlation between factors as subjects, is when parallelly, one factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects has a decrease in the flow of direct punctuations. At the same time, there is a decrease in the flow of direct punctuations in another factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects.

- A possible inversely proportional correlation between factors as subjects, is when one factor as subject or set of factors as subjects have an increment in the flow of direct punctuations, while at the same time, another factor as subject or set of factors as subjects have a decrease in their flow of direct punctuations, or vice versa.

- A possible relation of equal opportunities between factors as subjects is when all factors as subjects have exactly the same flow of direct punctuations, so if it is calculated the flow of empirical probabilities is calculated, all of them have, within a margin of error, the same value equal to the theoretical probability.

- A possible biased behaviour in factors as subjects is when the flow of empirical probabilities, out of a margin of error, is not equal to the theoretical probability. If the empirical probability is over a margin of error, the theoretical probability, then the empirical probability is positively biased, and if it is below a margin of error, the theoretical probability, then it is negatively biased.

Secondly, deductions from combinations of factors as subjects and factors as options, defining a factor as an option, like that one whose flow of data is a flow of frequencies.

- A probable relation of cause and effect between factors as subjects and factors as options, is when after some changes in the flow of direct punctuations from a factor as subject or a set of factors as subjects, there are other changes in the flow of frequencies of other factor as option or other factors as options. And vice versa, when after some changes in the flow of frequency from a factor as an option or a set of factors as options, there are other changes in the flow of direct punctuations of another factor as a subject or other factors as subjects.

- A possible direct positive proportional correlation between factors as subjects and factors as options is when parallelly, one factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects has an increment in the flow of direct punctuations. At the same time, there is an increment in the flow of frequencies in another factor as an option or a set of factors as options. And vice versa, parallelly, one factor as an option or a set of factors as options have an increment in the flow of frequencies. At the same time, there is an increment in the flow of direct punctuations in another factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects.

- A possible direct negative proportional correlation between factors as subjects and factors as options is when parallelly, one factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects has a decrease in the flow of direct punctuations. At the same time, there is a decrease in the flow of frequencies in another factor, as an option or a set of factors as options. And vice versa, parallel, one factor as an option or a set of factors as an option has a decrease in the flow of frequencies. At the same time, there is a decrease in the flow of direct punctuations in another factor as a subject or a set of factors as subjects. 

- A possible inversely proportional correlation between factors as subjects and factors as options, is when one factor as subject or set of factors as subjects have an increment in the flow of direct punctuations, while at the same time, another factor as option or set of factors as options have a decrease in their flow of frequencies. And vice versa, when one factor as an option or a set of factors as options has an increment in the flow of frequencies, while at the same time, another factor as a subject or set of factors as subjects has a decrease in their direct punctuations.

- A possible relation of equal opportunities between factors as subjects and factors as options is when all factors as subjects  have exactly the same flow of direct punctuations, at the same time that all factors as options have the same flow of frequencies. So if it is calculated the flow of empirical probabilities of factors as subjects, equal to every direct punctuation divided by the total of direct punctuations, all the empirical probabilities of factors as subjects have, within a margin of error, the same value, equal to the theoretical probability for subjects, one divided by the total number of subjects. And if it is calculated the flow of empirical probabilities of factors as options, equal to every frequency divided by the total of frequencies, all the empirical probabilities of factors as options have, within a margin of error, the same value, equal to the theoretical probability for options, one divided by the total number of options. If a set of factors as subjects and a set of factors as options, within their corresponding theoretical probability, are within a margin of error close to their theoretical probability, is possible to make a deduction that, within a margin of error, the behaviour of those factors is explainable by random behaviour, but another possible scenery is the possibility that sometimes the behaviour of equal opportunities could be produced by other factor behind that must he found out.

- A possible biased behaviour in factors as subjects and as options is when the flow of empirical probabilities is, out of a margin of error, not equal to the corresponding theoretical probability. If the empirical probability is over a margin of error, the corresponding theoretical probability, then the empirical probability is positively biased, and if it is below a margin of error, the corresponding theoretical probability is negatively biased. For factors as subjects, the corresponding theoretical probability is one divided by the total number of subjects. For factors as options, the corresponding theoretical probability is one divided by the total number of factors. If a positively or negatively biased subject or subjects are related to a biased option or options, or vice versa, possible deductions could be made. If this behaviour is not casual, and there is something behind it, it could be studied by taking samples from the global matrix, as a deduction to be transformed into an empirical hypothesis to contrast, and if rational, then to proceed to the formation of single virtual models to include in the comprehensive virtual model.

Thirdly, deductions from combinations of factors as options.

- A probable relation of cause and effect between factors as options is when, after some changes in the flow of frequencies from a factor as an option or a set of factors as options, there are other changes in the flow of frequencies of other factor as option or other factors as options.

- A possible direct positive proportional correlation between factors as options, is when parallely one factor as an option or a set of factors as options have an increment in the flow of frequencies, at the same time, there is an increment in the flow of frequencies in another factor as an option or a set of factors as options.

- A possible direct negative proportional correlation between factors as options, is when parallely one factor as an option or a set of factors as options have a decrease in the flow of frequencies, at the same time there is a decrease in the flow of frequencies in another factor as an option or a set of factors as options.

- A possible inversely proportional correlation between factors as options, is when one factor as an option or set of factors as options have an increment in the flow of frequencies, while at the same time, another factor as an option or set of factors as options have a decrease in their flow of frequencies, or vice versa.

- A possible relation of equal opportunities between factors as options is when all factors as options have exactly the same flow of frequencies, so if it is calculated the flow of empirical probabilities is calculated, all of them have, within a margin of error, the same value equal to the theoretical probability.

- A possible biased behaviour in factors as options is when the flow of empirical probabilities is, out of a margin of error, not equal to the theoretical probability. If the empirical probability is over a margin of error, the theoretical probability, then the empirical probability is positively biased, and if it is below a margin of error, the theoretical probability, then it is negatively biased.

Finally, another way in which deductions from factors as options within the global matrix can be made is by considering these options as categories defined in quantitative terms.

If within the global matrix, there are factors as options, for instance, related to diseases, these factors as options about diseases not only are going to be really useful to study their frequency in a country, continent or the whole planet, and how they are spreading out around the country, the continent, or the world, studying their behaviour, making deductions about how their behaviour is related to other factors as options or as subjects, and in case of diseases produced by virus or bacteria, studying their behaviour and how is associated to other factors, either as subjects or as options. The integration of a list of possible diseases within the global matrix working as factors as options (something really useful for the collaboration process between by Deduction and by Application), is going to give the possibility that, for instance, a personal program ( a Personal Particular Deduction Program within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Research, that one able to make deductions for a particular person in this case), combining the biostatistics of a particular person, and matching the biostatistics with the list of possible diseases permanently, at the least change in any factor in the biostatistics of that particular person which can coincide with any disease included as an option in the global matrix, automatically the personal program can make deductions about what diseases this person could get, in order to make further decisions.

If for an earthquake or a volcano, is necessary that the geological temperature has to grow up to certain point, having a definition about the thermic conditions in which this geological phenomenon happens, at the least sign of the increment of the geological temperature in any place, as long as the temperature is closer to produce some geological phenomenon, a particular geological program ( a geological Particular Deduction Program within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Research, that one able to make deductions in geology) can make deductions about, calculating the velocity in which the temperature is increasing, and any other factor in the area, how long is going to take the apparition of a geological phenomenon, in order to make further decisions.

Once the global matrix is able to integrate absolutely all possible information, in a country, a continent, the planet, or even the universe, particular programs having access to the information in the global matrix can make deductions in order to make particular decisions, at the same time that the Artificial Research by Deduction can make global deductions to make global decisions.

At the beginning the construction of Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are going to be an experiment in order to prepare the future construction of the global matrix, but once the global matrix is built then many Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are going to be completely absorbed by the Artificial Research by Deduction working on the global matrix as a system belonging to the Global Artificial Intelligence (as a system of systems), while others Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are going to be transformed into particular programs (Particular Deduction Program within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Research), having the benefit as programs that, much more than a specific matrix, they could have access to the whole global matrix, choosing directly from the global matrix those factors, as options or as subjects, that they will need for the deductions in their particular thing or being, making particular deductions to produce particular decisions.

In this way, what these particular programs are going to prepare is practically the integration process, in which not only some Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction can become particular programs, because some Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application can become particular programs as well, having access, by the time the integration is finished, to the definitive matrix, the matrix, where all possible categories must be integrated as options, along with the rest of factors, as subjects or as options, already included during the formation of the global matrix.

If, from the outset, the collaboration process between by Application and by Deduction works, the integration process is going to be a mere formality, because, practically, in the global matrix, are going to be included as factors as options all possible categories. The process in which at the end only is going to merge absolutely all possible information about what is happening in the world, or why not, in the universe, in only one matrix, is something that, if Artificial Intelligence goes on evolving towards the absolute knowledge, without restrictions, this process is going to be like a natural evolution process.

This contribution to Impossible Probability is intended as a conceptual and philosophical framework. While other approaches may emerge, I hope this work can offer a useful foundation for ongoing research in Global Artificial Intelligence.

Rubén García Pedraza, 14th of April of 2018, London

Reviewed 14 August 2019 Madrid

Reviewed 10 August 2023 Madrid

Reviewed 4 May 2025, London, Leytostone

imposiblenever@gmail.com

The standardization process within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence

In IImpossible Probability, the standardization process involves integrating all possible databases,  from: 1) all possible Specific Artificial Intelligences forArtificial Research by Deduction from any synthetic science, discipline, or activity, 2) as well as any other bare database able to provide a flow of information from possible factors definable in quantitative terms, coming up from any other national or international agency; included all of them ( 1 & 2) in the first gigantic database in the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, must be standardized to create a global matrix, being advisable to follow the international conventions, so as to give the chance later on to find any possible mathematical relation between any possible combination of factors (at any level of sub-factoring) within the global matrix in the second stage of replication, that treated as an empirical hypothesis if rational becomes a rational hypothesis forming a single virtual model, to be included in the comprehensive virtual model within the Global Artificial Intelligence, what it is a virtual global model.

Whenever the virtual global model is enhanced through the introduction of a new single virtual model, this improvement of the global model is considered as an objective auto-replication.

The precise role of the standardisation process within the extensive development of the Global Artificial Intelligence is as follows:

- The Global Artificial Intelligence is a system of systems, and is capable of including all possible specific intelligences. These systems are formed at least by: the Artificial Research by Deduction, the Modelling System, the Decisional System, the Learning System, and the Application System.

- Within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence a matrix will be created, comprising data flows or, preferably, information packages, coming up from all those factors (and sub-factors, if organized on packages of information), as subjects or options, previously defined in quantitative terms, flow of data or packages of information filled in the matrix with the measurements, in direct punctuations or frequencies, made by robotic devices. The flow of data or packages of information is continually tracked by rational replications looking for possible mathematical relations in any possible combination of factors at any level of sub-factoring, if it is organised as a flow of packages of information. Once any relation in any combination is found out, treated as an empirical hypothesis, rationally contrasted, if rational, then it becomes a single virtual model to include in the global virtual model.

- The construction of the matrix is going to be made through different phases.

- In the first phase, it is going to be necessary to gather as many databases as possible from any synthetic science, discipline, activity, capable of supplying a permanent flow of measurements defining its factors in quantitative terms, regardless of any other matter. In order to gather as many databases as possible, it is going to be necessary to reach national and international agreements with as many national or international institutions and agencies as possible to share their databases. This collection of databases what is going to create is a gigantic database, formed by bare databases without sorting out its factors with the shape of a matrix, and other databases probably coming up from institutions and agencies which have already created its own Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, whose databases are going to be specific matrix, whose factors have already sorted out. The first database will probably is going to be a gigantic database only at the national or continental level, but later on, as long as the process goes on, it will include more countries and fields to become a planetary, or even, a universal database. But not at the beginning, when the process starts, at least in the first tests: the easier the better, later on, more databases from other countries and fields, or even from the entire universe, can be included.

- Once all possible databases have been gathered creating a gigantic database, including those ones having already shaped as matrix and others practically as bare databases without sorting out its factors as a matrix, the standardization process implies that all databases collected must be organized in only one shaped as a matrix, sorting out all factors from all databases as if they belonged to the same matrix, keeping the same standards in terms of scale of measurement and ways to express the measurements, resulting at the end of this process the first global matrix. It would be advisable that the measurements should follow the international conventions, for instance, the scale of measurement and the way in which the measurements are going to be expressed should follow the international conventions in order to avoid any confusion as long as matrices from other countries are going to be added to this one. Imagine a global database working at national level in the United States of America which from the very beginning all the measurements use other scales (such as miles for distance or Fahrenheit for temperature) instead of the metric system or degrees Celsius, in case that other databases from other countries such as, Panama, Ukraine or South Korea, would share its databases, the measurements are going to need to be adapted. In order to avoid problems, much easier from the outset is to follow the international conventions in this matter. At the end of this process of standardisation, what is going to result is a global matrix, whose formation is the creation of a global application for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence. At the same time that the global matrix is created, the collaboration process goes on between Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application and the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence. And parallelly the global matrix is created as an application for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, at the same time the unification process of specific databases of categories from all Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application, can create a unified database of categories, as an application for the Unified Application, that one in which all Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application have been unified, to form only one.

- Once the global matrix is created when the standardization process has finished, the integration process is going to be that one in which within the global matrix are going to be incorporated either the unified database of categories if it is already finished, or it is not finished yet then the integration of all databases of categories from all Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application. After the completion of the integration process, as a result, we are going to have the definitive matrix, that is: the matrix.

At the end of this long process, all systems and intelligences must be integrated in only one, the Global Artificial Intelligence.

In synthesis, the matrix is going to be the third and last phase ( the first phase is the creation of a gigantic database, and the second one the global matrix after the standardization process) in the construction of the application for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, which is a program in the Global Artificial Intelligence, like other ones within the Global Artificial Intelligence, such as the Modelling System, the Decisional System, the Learning System, and the Application System.

So the standardization process is going to be that one in which all databases from all existing Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction and all possible databases from any other source of information that is not yet organized as a matrix, but having the possibility to define its factors in quantitative terms supplying a permanent flow of information, all these databases: as matrix or bare databases; are going to share their information in the same matrix, but now as a global matrix, being this global matrix the first real application for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

For the creation of this first application for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, is necessary to be aware that there are two options for its construction, depending on what kind of flow is going to be provided, whether a flow of data or a flow of packages of information.

If the global matrix is set up taking as a definition of factor that one able to provide a flow of data, the global matrix is going to have an incredible number of factors, having as many factors as flows of data coming up from robotic devices supplying information continuously.

The second option is to set up the matrix defining as factors those factors capable of supplying a flow of packages of information, containing every package the corresponding data from all the sub-factors included in the factor. Or even, the possibility that within the package of information in the main factor, even every sub-factor could send packages of information containing data from its corresponding sub-sub-factors, which in turn can send information coming up from its corresponding sub-sub-sub-factors, and so on at every level of sub-factoring.

This second option looks much better, being aware that the final goal of the Artificial Intelligence by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is to work by receiving, in the end, information from the entire universe.

If from the outset the application, the database in this phase working as a global matrix, is set up taking as factors those ones capable of supplying a flow of packages of information, when the Global Artificial Intelligence can extend its spatial limits even beyond the Earth, the only thing that it must do is to re-categorize the concept of factor.

For instance, in an initial global matrix working at the beginning at continental level receiving all kind of information from different countries, from different synthetic sciences, disciplines, and activities, instead of defining every single factor within every science, discipline, or activity, within every single country (first option), the second option is to set up a reduced number of factors supplying packages of information for every science, discipline, or activity, in each country. For instance, considering as factors the population in each country, the economy of each country, or the industry of each country, each factor should provide its own packages of information related to its own country. Packages of information which in turn can include sub-factors providing in turn packages of information much more specific, for instance, the package of information related to the economy in one country can be formed in turn by other flow of packages of information coming up from other sub-factors, such as packages of information about the monetary system, bank system, external trade, employment rate… which in turn can provide packages of information from other sub-sub-factors, such as, within the bank system, packages of information about mortgages, loans, debts, currency exchange… which in turn could provide more and more specific information organized in sub-sub-sub-factors as well, sub-sub-sub-factors capable of providing more specific packages of information from more and more specific sources of information at every time much deeper level of sub-factoring.

The main advantage of defining a factor like that one able to supply a flow of packages of information, is the fact that by the time the Global Artificial Intelligence can integrate information at planetary level, every country could be integrated as a factor itself containing all sub-factors at any sub-factoring level, and by the time the Global Artificial Intelligence can integrate information from practically the entire universe, the Earth itself could be considered as a factor itself (in that case every country would be re-categorize as a sub-factor) in the same way that any celestial body or astronomic phenomenon could be considered as a factor itself as well.

This process in which one factor becomes sub-factor as long as the Global Artificial Intelligence extends its spatial limits, is a process of re-categorization, due to the definition of factor or sub-factor, as well as any other level of sub-factoring, is going to depend on the increment of the spatial limits where the Global Artificial Intelligence is working.

Along with the definition of what a factor is, another important thing is the fact that the global matrix must integrate from the beginning, factors, at any level of sub-factoring, as subjects and as options.

In Impossible Probability the main difference between subjects and options is the fact that subjects are measured by direct punctuations, while options are measured by frequency. That is why any category from any database from any Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Application, can be considered as a factor, at any level of sub-factoring, as an option within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, being this fact the base for their mutual collaboration.

The inclusion of both types of factors, as subjects or as options, within the global matrix, facilitates the collaboration process between the Artificial Research by Application in the Global Artificial Intelligence and the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application, and when it is finished, with the Unified Application, being the base for the future integration process.

In fact, if this collaboration goes on along the standardisation process, the global matrix will have been built keeping the collaboration between by Deduction and by Application, so the integration process is going to be a mere formality.

Due to the global matrix must add, at any level of sub-factoring, factors as subjects and as options, is necessary to develop those ways in which by replication is possible to find out any mathematical relation between factors as subjects and factors as options, suitable to become an empirical hypothesis to be contrasted and, if rational, the formation of single virtual models to include in the global model.

In this process of tracking the global matrix, owing to the huge dimension that is going to have the global matrix, the tracking is going to need a very powerful capacity of energy to track the entire global matrix at high velocity, and being aware that at the beginning the tracking is going to spend a lot of time (while more powerful sources of energy are developed), meantime the standardization process goes on, and considering that the Global Artificial Intelligence is a system of systems, and the Global Artificial Intelligence must have under its own control, management and direction, all kind of Specific Artificial Intelligences for any purpose (from economy and industry to security and surveillance as well as any other), in order to help the tracking, one solution would be to keep working the original Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, but now under the control, management and direction of the Global Artificial Intelligence, like any other Specific Artificial Intelligence working for the Global Artificial Intelligence for any other purpose.

At the beginning of the standardization process, in order to help the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, and in order to resolve the problem above described keeping working the original Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, then these ones can make deductions within its own synthetic sciences, disciplines, and activities, that if rational their single virtual models can be sent directly to the global model, while the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is more focused on mathematical relations between factors from different synthetic sciences, disciplines and activities.

In order to make this solution possible, it would be necessary that, at the same time that Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction still receive their corresponding flow of data to make their specific deductions, this flow of data must be shared at the same time with the global matrix.

So those specific matrices still working could share their flows of data with the global matrix, making specific deductions that if rational can be sent to the global model, while this same flows of data shared within the global matrix allow the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence to make inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary empirical hypothesis.

If the collaboration between by Application and by Deduction is based on the idea of a double tracking: by Application is tracked the real world while by Deduction is tracked the global matrix; during the time that is going to take the standardization process another collaboration would be possible allowing another different double check but this time over the global matrix.

While the standardization process is not completed yet, but in fact working the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction for and in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the same flow of data that they are going to send to the global matrix, is an information that they can track at specific level within their specific matrix while at global level is carried out another track but looking for inter-disciplinary or trans-disciplinary mathematical relations.

So within the flow of data could be carried out a double tracking while the standardization process is not completed: the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction can track their corresponding flows of data at specific level looking for intra-disciplinary relations, while these same flows of data shared in the global matrix could be tracked looking for inter-disciplinary or trans-disciplinary relations at global level by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

The possibility of collaboration between: Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction and the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence; at the beginning of the standardization process could be a solution if the amount of energy to spend tracking the global matrix would be so excessive, slowing down the process too much. In that case, one solution to save energy and time is to reserve the tracking at a global level for inter-disciplinary and trans-disciplinary relations, keeping the intra-disciplinary relations at a specific level for its corresponding Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction.

But these solutions should be temporary, while a very powerful source of energy could allow us to track the global matrix at very high velocity, making decisions in real time, when things happen.

The main advantage to have ready as soon as possible the global matrix, that without any help could track the global matrix completely alone, is the possibility to find out mathematical relations between factors, at any level of sub-factoring, even between factors from different synthetic sciences, disciplines, or activities. While the Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction in a particular synthetic science, discipline, or activity, does not have the option to cross information with any other science, discipline, or activity.

And even much more than inter-disciplinary or trans-disciplinary studies, having gathered in only one global matrix all possible information, there will be the possibility of the creation of particular programs for very particular study, within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

A Particular Deduction Program within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, would be that particular program to study a set of particular factors regarding to a particular thing or being (at any level of sub-factoring) within the global matrix (or the matrix, after the integration process), whose information is going to be treated particularly for this program (apart from those global studies made by Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence), in order to make only particular decisions for this particular thing or being, decisions that, as any other decision, before putting it into practice, must be authorized by the Decisional System.

The Particular Deduction Program is not a Specific Artificial Intelligence because is already integrated within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence. The Particular Deduction Program will be a special program within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, having access to all information in the global matrix (the matrix after the integration process) in order to make particular possible decisions for such a particular thing or such a particular being, for what it has been designed, particular decisions that must be authorized by the Decisional System.

The coexistence of: 1) Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction for specific synthetic sciences, disciplines, activities, 2) Particular Deductions Programs regarding to particular things or beings; working on and for the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, is something that is going to depend on the results.

Ideally, it is desirable that at the end all Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction finish being absorbed by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, or become Particular Deduction Programs, but not for that reason means that a Particular Deduction Program is like an Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction.

While an Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction works on an specific synthetic science, discipline, or activity, in reality a Particular Deduction Program works on a particular thing or a particular being, what means that it could be possible the creation of Particular Deduction Programs even for particular humans beings, programs taking the information from the global matrix, and whose decisions must be authorized by the Decisional System.

Once the global matrix is created, there are going to be a lot of ways to work on it, one of them the possibility to gather factors and sub-factors related to any particular thing or being, and study anything that could happen among them, in order to make further decisions.

Rubén García Pedraza, 12th of April of 2018, London
Reviewed 13 August 2019 Madrid

Reviewed 4 May 2025, London, Leytostone