Until
now what I have developed, in relation to the Global Artificial Intelligence,
on this blog, is the sixth phases: 1)the construction of specific intelligences
by Application and by Deduction, 2) the collaboration between them, 3)the standardization
process, 4) the unification process, 5) particular programs, particularapplications, and particular programs for particular applications, 6) the
integration process.
And
within the Artificial Research by Deduction, for every phase first (specific
intelligence by Deduction), third (standardised Global Artificial Intelligence),
fifth (particular programs), sixth (integrated Global Artificial Intelligence),
I have developed in detail the third stage by Deduction, analysing for every
phase by Deduction: specific (first), standard (third), particular (fifth),
integrated (sixth); how the third stage
by Deduction could be subdivided in: Modelling System (first step within the
third stage by Deduction), Decisional System (second step within the third
stage by deduction), Application System (third step within the third stage by
Deduction), Learning System (fourth step within the third stage by deduction).
Within
the third step, the Application System we can distinguish between: the Application System as an outer instructions application sub-system,
and the Artificial Engineering as an inner instructions application sub-system. In
turn, Artificial Engineering as an inner application sub-system (as a
sub-system within the Application System) consist of two different programs:
the Designer of Artificial Intelligence and the Intelligent Robotic Mechanic.
Because
the fourth steps within the third stage in by Deduction should be developed in
every phase in which by Deduction is involved, for that reason, as long the
Artificial Research by Deduction is evolving from the first phase to the sixth
phase, every step within the third stage evolves as long as the intelligences associated
with are evolving.
That
is why in the first phase by Deduction, Specific Artificial Intelligence for
Artificial Research by Deduction, the third stage consists of: the specific
Modelling System, the specific Decisional System, the specific Application
System, the specific Learning System.
In
the third phase by Deduction, standardised Global Artificial Intelligence, the
third stage consists of: the standard Modelling System, the standard Decisional System, the standard Application System, the standard Learning System.
In
the fifth phase by Deduction, particular programs and particular programs for
particular applications, as long as the synthesis between particular programs
and particular applications is done, the third stage consists of: the
particular Modelling System, the particular Decisional System, the particular Application System, the particular Learning System.
And
in the sixth phase by Deduction, the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence,
the third stage consists of: the integrated Modelling System, the integrated Decisional System, the integrated Application System, and the integrated
Learning System.
In
the analysis of the third stage by deduction, until now I have developed: the
Modelling System and the Decisional System in phases first (specific), third
(standard), fifth (particular) and sixth (integrated), and I have developed the
Application System as outer sub-system only for phases first (specific), third
(standard), and fifth (particular), but not yet for the sixth phase (integrated),
and not having developed yet the Artificial Engineering as inner sub-system,
and not having developed yet the Learning System at all.
For
the development of the third stage by Application, what it will be very
important, is the analysis made previously for the design of the third stage by
Deduction, in fact, at some point, the third stage by Application will borrow
from the third stage by Deduction, many ideas but adapted for the development
of the third stage by Application.
If
in the third stage by Deduction the fourth steps are: Modelling System,
Decisional System, Application System, Learning System. The third stage by
Application will be distributed in the same steps, only adding to distinguish
these ones from the steps within the third stage by Deduction, the label of categorical, naming them: categorical Modelling System, categorical Decisional
System, categorical Application System, categorical Learning System.
For
that reason, now when analysing the categorical: Modelling, Decisional,
Application, Learning; Systems, to distinguish between these categorical systems
as four steps within the third stage by Application, respect to those systems
developed as four steps within the third stage by Deduction, the four systems developed
within the third stage by deduction will be called: deductive Modelling System,
deductive Decisional System, deductive Application System, deductive Learning
System.
The
way in which, in general, the four steps within the third stage by Deduction
work is as follows:
- The
specific/standardized/particular/integrated deductive Modelling System: once
the specific or global program or particular program files the rational
hypothesis in the database of rational hypothesis (first stage), is modelled
(second stage), to make decisions (third stage) based on Deduction and
Probability, trigonometry, solving maths problems, Impact of the Defect and
Effective Distribution, and as soon the decisions are made, the decisions are
filed in the database of decisions as first stage for the specific/standardized/particular/integrated
deductive Decisional System.
-
The specific/standardized/particular/integrated deductive Decisional System:
having as first stage the database of decisions, the decisions are projected as
second stage, to be transformed into instructions in the third stage, once the
decision is transformed into a range of instructions, the deductive Decisional
System files the instructions in the database of instructions as first stage
for the specific/standardized/particular/integrated deductive Application
System as outer sub-system.
-
The specific/standardised/particular/integrated deductive Application System,
having as first stage the database of instructions, in the second stage matches
every instruction to the right application or robotic device to apply the
instruction. The applications or robotic devices are distributed as well in three
stages, first one their individual database of instructions, the second one the
application of every instruction, as the third stage the final report for every
instruction. Having all the reports for every instruction, the third stage of
the Application System makes a final assessment to send, in addition to the
Decisional System, waiting for further decisions, to the Learning System,
including every assessment in the database of evaluations in the Learning
System.
- The
specific/standardized/particular/integrated deductive Learning System, will
have different sources of information, the database of reports from the
Application System, the seven rational critiques, and the whole assessment of
the Specific or Global Artificial Intelligence or particular program or particular
program for particular application, for the analysis of these three sources of
information as second stage, to make decisions as third stage.
Having
in mind how the specific/standardised/particular/integrated deductive
Modelling-Decisional-Application-Learning Systems work in Specific or Global
Artificial Intelligence and particular programs or particular programs for
particular applications.
The
way to develop the categorical Modelling-Decisional-Application-Learning Systems
for Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Application,
the collaboration between by Deduction and by Application, the Unified
Application, particular applications, and the categorical management of categorical attributions within the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence is as follows:
-
Categorical Modelling System: once previously in the second stage by Application every real object has
been matched with the right category from the database of categories in the
first stage (otherwise the measurements of this real object would be included
within the database of categories as a new category), in the third stage, the first step is the categorical Modelling System, according to what category has
been chosen to match the real object, the real object is classified in
the right file within the conceptual scheme as first stage of the categorical
Modelling System. Once the real object has been filed in the right file in the
conceptual scheme as first stage of the categorical Modelling System, them in
the second stage of the categorical Modelling System are identified all the
conceptual sets of this object according to its category as well as any other quality set,
and according to these conceptual sets is made the conceptual model, and the
conceptual model located in the conceptual map. As third stage the decision
according to the category, model and map, for instance, the classification of
packages to be sent by a drone system, or a system of drive-less cars, once the
packages have been identified, matching categories, sets, models, and
identified where is located the origin and the destiny, is time to make decisions upon this information to send the
package. In a plantation, once the seeds are received, matched, classified, modelled and located in the right place within the plantation
for these seeds, upon these results to make decisions to plant the seeds in the right place in the
plantation. For instance, according to what kind of seed of coffee or tea,
where is the right place to plant these seeds in the plantation, carrying on all the
decisions to plant the seeds according to these categories, sets, models, and
location on the map of the plantation.
-
Categorical Decisional System: once the decision is made in the third stage of
the categorical Modelling System, then the categorical Modelling System files
the decision in the database of categorical decisions as the first stage of the
categorical Decisional System. As the second stage, the categorical Decisional
System makes the projects, and as the third stage, the decisions on the project are
transformed into instructions, to be filed in the categorical database of
instructions, as the first stage of the categorical Application System. In a drone
system for the delivery of packages, projecting every journey of every drone,
and distributing the decision into instructions. As soon as the collaboration
between by Application and by Deduction starts working, combining navigation by
Deduction and the categorical assignment of Destination by Application. At the
end, by the time that particular programs for particular applications start
working as an experiment for the integration process, every drone must combine
navigation by Deduction and categorisation of destiny by Application. In a
plantation of coffee or tea, once the seeds are classified, if tea or coffee, to
plant every seed in the right place according to its category, coffee or tea.
-
Categorical Application System: having as first stage the categorical database
of instructions, the second stage matches every instruction to the right
application or robotic device, the application or robotic device is organised
as well in three stages, and as third stage the final report, to send, among
other recipients, the categorical Learning System.
-
categorical Learning System: having, as first stage, as sources of information the
categorical database of reports, the rational critiques of every attributional
process, and the whole assessment of the whole process using Impact of the
Defect and Effective Distribution, the analysis of this information as second
stage, to make decisions as third stage.
Every
categorical system by Application will be developed in the third stage of the
first phase, the second phase, and the fourth phase. and at least the first two steps in the third stage of the sixth phase for the categorical management of categorical attributions within the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence.
In the first phase, the analysis of the third stage of the Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Application, analysing the specific categorical Modelling System, the specific categorical Decisional System, the specific categorical Application System, as inner and as outer instruction sub-system, and the specific categorical Learning System.
In the first phase, the analysis of the third stage of the Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Application, analysing the specific categorical Modelling System, the specific categorical Decisional System, the specific categorical Application System, as inner and as outer instruction sub-system, and the specific categorical Learning System.
In
the second phase analysing how in the third stage the specific categorical
Modelling System, the specific categorical Decisional System, the specific
categorical Application System, the specific categorical Learning System are
going to collaborate with the specific deductive Modelling System, specific
deductive Decisional System, specific deductive Application System and the
specific deductive Learning System. Collaboration which is going to set up the
real foundations for later on the creation of the first particular programs for
particular applications, or particular applications for particular programs, in
the fifth phase, getting ready the first experiments at particular level to be
applied later at global level in the sixth phase, the integrated Global
Artificial Intelligence.
In
the fourth phase, analysing the third stage of the Unified Application,
analysing the unified categorical Modelling System, the unified categorical Decisional System, the unified
categorical Application System, tand he unified categorical Learning System.
The
Unified Application as a result of the integration process, sixth phase, should
be responsible for the management of the matrix, as application or first stage
for the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence, and responsible for the
management of the whole integrated Application System, as a result to integrate
the standardized deductive Application System, or first global deductive
Application System, and the unified categorical Application System.
In the sixth phase there are at least two strategies: the most popular one which is going to be boosted by intelligence agencies in US, Russia, and China, to boost the synthesis of the intetgrated deductive Modelling System and the integrated categorical Modelling System, synthesising the deductive model, the categorical model, the deductive project, and the categorical project, to create the plan as soon as possible, having in one plan the synthesis of deductive and categorical models and projects.
Instead my approach would be to analyse every possible contradiction in the management of the integrated deductive model and intetgrated deductive project (both of them synthesised in the third deductive instant), and every possible contradiction in the management of the integrated categorical model and integrated categorical project (both of them synthesised in the third categorical instant), what I would do is to develop in different systems within the third stage of the integrated Global Artirficial Intelligence, in parallel, the integrated deductive Modelling System, the integrated deductive Decisional System, and on the other hand the integrated categorical Modelling System, the integrated categorical Decisional System, only mixing these two different ways of management of deductive and categorical attributions in the integrated Application system as that one which should manage all the instructions coming from deductive and categorical processes.
The methodology that I will develop, is much slower, but I will ensure that the third deductive instant in the integration process, the integrated deducive plan joining the deductive model and project, will be right, at the same time that I am ensuring that the third categorical instant joining the categorical model and project is right too, so I am sure that the third instant has been done without mistake in the deductive plan and without mistake in the categorical plan, the fourth instant should be to join the categorical and deductive plan in only one plan, I will develop this fourth instant as part of the seven phase, the reason itself.
In the sixth phase there are at least two strategies: the most popular one which is going to be boosted by intelligence agencies in US, Russia, and China, to boost the synthesis of the intetgrated deductive Modelling System and the integrated categorical Modelling System, synthesising the deductive model, the categorical model, the deductive project, and the categorical project, to create the plan as soon as possible, having in one plan the synthesis of deductive and categorical models and projects.
Instead my approach would be to analyse every possible contradiction in the management of the integrated deductive model and intetgrated deductive project (both of them synthesised in the third deductive instant), and every possible contradiction in the management of the integrated categorical model and integrated categorical project (both of them synthesised in the third categorical instant), what I would do is to develop in different systems within the third stage of the integrated Global Artirficial Intelligence, in parallel, the integrated deductive Modelling System, the integrated deductive Decisional System, and on the other hand the integrated categorical Modelling System, the integrated categorical Decisional System, only mixing these two different ways of management of deductive and categorical attributions in the integrated Application system as that one which should manage all the instructions coming from deductive and categorical processes.
The methodology that I will develop, is much slower, but I will ensure that the third deductive instant in the integration process, the integrated deducive plan joining the deductive model and project, will be right, at the same time that I am ensuring that the third categorical instant joining the categorical model and project is right too, so I am sure that the third instant has been done without mistake in the deductive plan and without mistake in the categorical plan, the fourth instant should be to join the categorical and deductive plan in only one plan, I will develop this fourth instant as part of the seven phase, the reason itself.
From my point of view, the integrated Application System should integrate the standardised deductive
Application System; in other words, the Application System coming from the
standardised Global Artificial Intelligence, third phase, and the unified categorical
Application System; in other words, the Application System coming from the
Unified Application.
The
union of the Application System from the standardized Global Artificial
Intelligence, and the Application System from the Unified Application, will be
integrated Application System, integrating the deductive and categorical
Application Systems in only one final integrated Application System working for
the final Global Artificial Intelligence, including in this integrated
Application System the integrated Application System as outer sub-system, and
the Artificial Engineering as inner sub-system.
For
the whole development of the integrated Application System as a result to join the deductive and the categorical Application System, in other words, the Application
System within the Global Artificial Intelligence and the Application System
within the Unified Application, then is necessary to develop previously the
categorical Application System, as log as it is part of the systems
comprehended within the third stage by Application: the categorical Modelling
System, the categorical Decisional System, the categorical Application System,
and the categorical Learning System.
Along the entire process made by Application, there will be four categorical critiques,
whose responsible is the categorical Learning System, the four categorical
critiques are:
-
First objective categorical critique: criticising that the attribution made in
the second stage by Application, matching a real object and a category within
the database of categories, is right. If there is a high number or wrong
attributions in any category, equal to or greater than a critical reason, it should be enough to research the origin of this high level of wrong
attributions, identifying the common element in all these wrong attributions to
be fixed.
-
Second decisional categorical critique: criticizing that the attribution made
in the categorical Modelling System, matching models and decisions, is right,
if there is a high number of wrong attributions in any kind of models related
to any category matched to any real object, equal to or greater than a critical
reason, is necessary to search for the common element in all the wrong attributions between
models and decisions to be fixed.
-
Third instructional categorical critique: criticizing that the attribution made
in the categorical Decisional System, in the distribution of instructions for
every decision, is right, if in the distribution of instructions per decision,
there is a high level or wrong instructions attributed to any decision, as least
equal to or greater than a critical reason, then it is necessary the research of what is the
common element in all the wrong attributions between decisions and
instructions.
-
Fourth robotic categorical critique: criticizing that the attribution made in
the Application System, attributing instructions and applications or robotic
devices is right, if there is a high level or wrong attributions, equal to or
greater than a critical reason, then the research of the common element in the
wrong attribution to be fixed.
All
these critiques are categorical because all of them depend on the categorical
attribution made in the second stage of by Application, attributing categories
to real objects, depending on the category attributed to the real object, later
on the modelling of the real object will depend on this attribution, and
according to the model the attribution of the right decision, in essence the
attribution of a decision to a real object depends on the attribution of the
right category to this object, if the initial categorical attribution is wrong,
then the decisional attribution will be wrong, what means that there is a
probability that a high level of wrong attributions between decisions and
models relies on wrong attributions between objects and categories, not found
out on time being causes of further mistakes.
According
to the categorical decision, in the categorical Modelling System, later on the
categorical Decisional System will transform the decision into instructions,
which is not other thing but the attribution of instructions to decisions, and
according to this attribution, later on the attribution of instructions to
robotic devices.
In
the end, all the attributional process in by Application relies on the
categorical attribution made on the second stage, attributing the right category
to every real object. And for that reason, the critiques made by Application
are called categorical critiques, while the critiques made by Deduction are
rational critiques because they depend on the attribution of pure reasons
(equations) to a set of data.
When
the attributional process relies on the attribution of pure reasons to data, further
critiques as a consequence of this rational attribution are rational critiques.
When the attributional process relies on the attribution of categories to real
objects, further critiques as a consequence of this categorical attribution are
categorical critiques.
Along
with the categorical critiques in by Application, every system in every step
within the third stage by Application, will have its own assessment of every
process or procedure within the system.
In
the same way that the deductive Modelling System includes the rational checks, the
categorical Modelling System will include the categorical checks, with the
difference that, instead of seven rational checks, there will be five categorical
checks.
The
first categorical check in the categorical Modelling System as first step
within the third stage by Application, is to check the absence of
contradictions between the real objects, if the categorical attribution in the
second stage by Application was right, and was filing in the right file in the
conceptual scheme as first stage of the categorical Modelling System, should
not be any contradiction between the objects in the conceptual scheme.
In
the second stage in the categorical Modelling System, the second categorical
check will ensure that the conceptual sets, within the real object, according to the classification, are right.
For
instance, in social science, the attribution of any social profile to any
person, as a attributional process in the second stage, will end up classifying
that person in the conceptual scheme in that place which corresponds to that person
in the scheme, associated with that scheme and category, the place of that
category in that scheme could be related to some conceptual sets, the second
categorical check will check that the conceptual sets associated with that real
object according to the category and the scheme, are right for that real
object.
If
in a dating site, according to the category attributed to that person, and the
place where that person has been located in the conceptual scheme, that person
should belong to those conceptual sets associated with that category and place
in the scheme, in order to match that person with potential partners, the
second check will ensure that the supposed conceptual sets associated with that
person according to the category attributed and place in the scheme, are
conceptual sets right to that person, that real person has been rightly inserted
in that conceptual sets. Otherwise, the person should be catalogued in other
categories, or other places in the scheme, or if the scheme is liquid, to
keep that person in that category and place in the scheme but removing that
person from those conceptual sets which, normally correlating to that category
and place in the scheme, are not within the qualities of that person.
This
means that the relation between conceptual sets and categories could be liquid
or not, or the relation between conceptual sets and places in the scheme could
be liquid or not, liquid when is possible to keep a real object within a
category or place in a scheme but removing some conceptual sets for some
particular objects in that category and place, although for the most of the
objects in that category or place these sets are fully valid. Not liquid when
checking the conceptual sets, when an object does not match with some sets, is
reason enough as to remove the object from that category and/or place.
The
third categorical check in the categorical Modelling System, once the category,
the scheme, the sets, have been checked,
will check that the conceptual model is according to the category, the scheme
and the conceptual sets related to, or not removed from, that object, making an
isomorphic model of that object.
The
fourth categorical check in the categorical Modelling System will check that, according to the scheme, the sets, and the model, the model is located in the
right place on the map.
The
first fourth categorical checks within the categorical Modelling System are in
fact the criticism of the deep artificial comprehension system, in which the
categorical Modelling System consists of, in fact the first and second stages
in the categorical Modelling System is the deep artificial comprehension
system, structured as: conceptual scheme as first stage, and as second stage
the conceptual sets, conceptual model, and conceptual map.
Having
as first and second stages the deep artificial comprehension system, the third
stage of the categorical Modelling System is the attribution of the right
decision to every real object.
In
a dating site, according to the conceptual: scheme, sets, model, location on
the map; of every person, to match that person with the nearest person to
make them possible meet up.
In
a plantation of coffee or tea, the decision of, according to the variety of
seeds of coffee or tea, the decision about where to plant and how to make the
coffee or tea grow up.
In
an artificial delivery system, the attribution of the right means of transport, a drone or driverless car to carry every package to the recipient.
Once
the decision is made, the decision is stored in the categorical database of
decisions as first stage for the categorical Decisional System, in order to make the categorical projects as second stage, match in the third stage the decision to the right range of instructions, in
other words, the distribution of instructions per decision, to be sent to the categorical database of
instructions as first stage for the categorical Application System.
In
the same way that the categorical Modelling System will develop the categorical
checks to ensure that all the processes within the categorical Modelling System are done having its performance high standards of efficiency, the categorical Decisional
System will carry out the categorical adjustments to ensure the efficiency in
all its processes and procedures, and the categorical Application System will
carry out the categorical supervision to ensure high standards.
Rubén García Pedraza, 11 January 2020 London
Reviewed 18 May 2025, London, Leytostone