The
second stage of the particular Application System as outer instructions
application sub-system is that one where the instructions already gathered in
the particular database of instructions, first stage of the particular Application
System as outer sub-system, having passed the first rational assessment, are
going to be matched to the right robotic device working for this particular
program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, filing the Application System as outer sub-system the instruction
in the right file according to: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority,
monitoring level, time, order; within the individual database of instructions
as first stage for that particular robotic device. Adding, as I will explain, a
new criterion more, origin internal or external.
The
second stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system in the
fifth phase, alike the second stage in the specific Application System in the
first phase, and the standardized Application System as outer sub-system in the
third phase, consists mainly of the attributional process matching every
instruction (robotic function) with the right robotic device, attributing in
the fifth phase every robotic function (instruction) with the right robotic
device working for this particular program, particular application, particular
program for particular application.
If
there is an instruction, whose responsible to match, is a robotic device not
working for this particular program, particular application, or particular
program for particular application, and the robotic device responsible for the
application of that instruction is a robotic device working for the Global Artificial Intelligence itself or any other residual specific intelligence, or
new different particular program, application, or particular program for
particular application, in that case, in the same way that in the distribution
of decisions in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence are catalogued as
external decisions those ones which coming from a particular Modelling System
are decisions to be applied by the integrated Decisional System, or sent to the
integrated Decisional System to be resent to the right particular program,
particular application, or particular program for particular application, then
if there is an instruction in the particular outer sub-system whose responsible
is not any robotic device working for this particular program, application,
particular program for particular application, this instruction should be
treated as an external instruction and sent to that specific or global
intelligence, or program or application, responsible for that robotic device,
able to apply this instruction as external instruction.
Otherwise,
the other option could be, skipping the specific or global intelligence,
particular program or application, responsible for that device, the particular
program/application origin of this instruction could send directly the external
instruction to that device, but this other option would have some problems, especially
when the robotic device able to carry out this instruction works for the Global
Artificial Intelligence, or for another program/application where the inclusion
of an instruction coming from another different program/application directly to another different program/application can
produce some confusion, for instance robotic devices working for cyborgs, if
receiving orders from more than one program if not assessed before the lack of
contradiction between programs, more than one program not assessing possible
contradictions sending instructions to the same robotic device can cause
further difficulties.
The
possibility that particular programs/applications could send external
instructions directly to robotic devices working for different specific/global intelligence
or program/applications, is a possibility that should be restricted only to regular
instructions to those specific/global intelligence or program/particular,
defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions needing
their original decisions a quick check not having these instructions any record
of contradiction in the receptor.
Instead, it should be more advisable when in the application of the instruction, the
origin and the receptor are not the same, not skipping the receptor
intelligence or program/application, to treat the external instruction in the
receptor database of instructions as an external instruction.
There
are different types of external instructions:
-
An external particular-to-global instruction, sent by a particular program,
application, or particular program for a particular application, to the global
outer sub-system, to be applied by robotic devices working for the global outer
sub-system. In this case, because previously the decisions in which this
instruction has been based, is a decision informed to or assessed by the global
Decisional System, the global outer sub-system would not need to pass more
assessments other than the rational supervisions.
-
An external global-to-particular instruction, sent by the Global Artificial
Intelligence to the particular outer sub-system, these ones correspond to the
upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level..
-
An external particular-to-particular instruction, an instruction made by a
particular program, application, a particular program for a particular application,
to be applied by another different particular program, application, particular
program for a particular application.
In
this last case, particular-to-particular, in addition to the particular assessments
of the original decision in the particular Decisional System, and according to
their nature, only informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System, and
passing the first and second rational supervision in the particular Application
System origin of this instruction, there are two options:
-The
particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction knows what other
particular program/application is responsible for applying this external instruction
and can send the instruction to this different particular
program/application. In this first scenery, this is a real
particular-to-particular.
-
The particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction does not know what
other particular program/application could apply this instruction, or is not
able (for instance due to robotic problems), or is not allowed (for instance,
security codes) to apply this instruction, therefore it sends the external
instruction to the global outer sub-system to resend the instruction to the
right application. In this case, this is an external
particular-global-particular instruction.
In
any case, either particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular, once
the external instruction is received by that new different particular program/application
(particular program, particular application, particular program for particular
application), this different particular program, application, particular
program for particular application (particular program/application), must pass
at least the seventh rational supervisions before the application of that particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular instruction.
If
the number of external instructions to apply by this third particular
program/application is a significant number of external instructions (belonging
to the same or different decisions, coming from the same origin or different
origins), this different particular program/application, not only should pass
the seven rational supervisions, should pass the corresponding assessment,
quick or rational adjustment, in the original decisions of these instructions,
because if a particular outer sub-system has to apply a significant number of
decisions (coming from the same/different decisions/programs), a significant
number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions can interfere
in the particular plan of this particular program/application
Therefore
when the number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions,
coming from different/same decision/origin is equal to or greater than a
critical reason, the program/application receptor not only has to assess the
external instruction, but to include the original decision in its particular
database of decisions (first stage particular Decisional System) to be assessed and evaluate any possible interference with its
particular plan, applying for that reason on that decision the quick rational check or seven rational
adjustments according to what type of decision it is, in addition to the seven
rational supervisions to these external particular-to/global-particular
instructions.
In synthesis, the four types of external instructions are: particular-to-global,
global-to-particular, particular-to-particular, particular-global-particular.
These two last ones, having as origin a particular program/application and
having as responsible another particular program/application, have as their only
difference if the instructions need to have as a filter the global outer
sub-system, in general, these two last ones could be integrated as external particular-to/global-particular
instructions.
External particular-to-particular instruction when the origin, the original
particular program/application which made the instruction, knows and is able
and allow to send directly instructions to another different particular
program.
External particular-global-particular instruction, when the origin, the original
particular program/application which made the instruction, does not know, and/or is not able, or is not allowed to send directly an external instruction to that
other particular program/application (for instance due to security codes), sending that external instruction firstly
to the global outer sub-system to later resend the external instruction to the
right particular program/application.
In
general, the evaluations to be done in external instructions vary according to the
different types. In particular-to-global, because previously the decision was
informed or assessed at the global level, at the global level, an external particular-to-global
instruction only needs to pass the global rational supervisions.
External
global-to-particular instructions are instructions with an upper intermediate monitoring
level or a high monitoring level.
And
in particular-to/global-particular, if the number of external instructions to
be applied for the receptor is low, the instructions only need the rational
supervisions in the receptor, in addition to the first rational supervision in
the origin. Only when the number of external instructions in the receptor is
equal to or greater than a critical number, the receptor should request the
original decisions of these instructions, to be included in the particular
Decisional System of the receptor to pass the quick rational check or the seven
rational adjustments, to evaluate any possible interference between external
decisions/instructions and its own internal decisions/instructions.
For
that reason when any external particular-to/global-particular instruction is
sent to a particular program/application receptor, the firs evaluation that the
receptor should do is to evaluate how many instructions from the same/different
decision/origin are active in the receptor, if there is a critical number or
more, the original decisions, and not only the external instructions, must pass
the particular evaluation in the receptor, in case of external
decisions applying the quick check or rational adjustments in the particular
Decisional System of that particular program/application receptor.
If
a critical number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions
demand the evaluation of the original decisions by the particular Decisional
System of the program/application receptor, once the decision passes the
assessment in the particular Decisional System receptor, the external instructions
can be processed by the receptor Application System, starting filing the
external decisions in the right file in the particular database of instructions
in the receptor, according to: position, subject, priority, monitoring level,
origin (in this case external, signalling the original program), time, and
order; in order to start the rational supervisions.
If
the number of external instructions is not so high, the receptor only passes
the rational supervisions in the particular Application System, filing the
external particular-to/global-particular instructions in its particular
database of instructions, to be analysed in the first supervision according to:
sub-factoring level (no contradiction with any other instruction in this or any
other sub-factoring level in the particular application/program), sub-section
(more specifically, no contradiction respect to any other instruction within
its own subject), priority (adaptation rule in case of contradiction, the less
priority is adapted to the superior instruction), monitoring level (having two
contradictory decisions the same priority, the one with lower monitoring level is
adapted to that one with higher monitoring level), time (if contradiction about
when an instruction is applied, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme
or high extreme instructions), nth order within the range of instructions (if
contradiction, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme or high extreme
instructions).
Due
to the importance that external decisions can have, in the criteria for the
organization of the database: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority,
monitoring level, time, order; it would be necessary to include as a new criterion more the origin: internal or
external, and if external, signalling the original program of the original
decision/instruction.
All
instructions related to decisions made by a particular Modelling System
(low level), or having been made by the global Modelling System, are assessed
by a particular Decisional System (lower and upper intermediate level), or having been processed by the global Decisional System, are directly sent to a particular Application System (high level) all
of these instructions, regardless of the source (particular/global
Modelling/Decisional system) are included in the particular database of
instructions.
Among
all these instructions, the upper intermediate monitoring level and the high monitoring
level are considered external global-to-particular instructions. Lower
intermediate monitoring level are not global-to-particular instructions really
because as soon the global Modelling System sends the decision to the
particular Decisional System, this decision belongs to the particular project,
the way in which this decision belonging to the particular project has been
distributed in robotic functions in the third stage of the particular
Decisional System, depends on how the particular Decisional System has
projected the decision.
For
that reason, in the particular database of decisions as first stage in the particular
Decisional System, a decision sent by the global Modelling System to the
particular Decisional System could be considered as an external global decision
in the particular database of decisions, but once this decision is a responsibility for the particular Decisional System, making the project and the
distribution of the decision into instructions, the resulting instructions are
as a result of a particular process in the particular Decisional System, so
these instructions are not external instructions anymore, the decision was external but the
instruction making process upon the global decision is an internal process, so
these instructions are internal, so any mistake in the elaboration of the
instructions is an internal error, not external error, is internal to the
particular Decisional System
This
means that in low monitoring level, the decisions and the instructions are
internal, in lower intermediate monitoring level, the decisions are global-external but the
instructions are internal, in upper intermediate and high monitoring level, the
decisions and the instructions are global-external. In addition to
global-external decisions and global-external instructions, in combinations of
internal decisions, global-external decisions, internal instructions, global-external instructions, it is necessary to add particular-external decisions (particular-to/global-particular decisions) and
particular-external instructions (particular-to/global-particular instructions).
Global-external
decisions, when the particular database of decisions has to manage decisions
coming from the global Modelling System (lower intermediate level), or coming
from the global Decisional System (upper intermediate and high level).
Global-external instructions when the particular database of instructions has
to manage instructions coming from the global Decisional System (upper
intermediate and high level). Sets of internal/external global/particular
decisions/instructions to add the particular-to/global-particular instructions.
The
importance of these classifications, as many more that can be done as soon the
first projects on Global Artificial Intelligence start emerging in coming
years, is the fact that, regardless of the source or origin of any decision or
instruction, as soon an instruction is gathered in a database of
instructions (regardless of the origin), not because when matching the instruction to the corresponding
robotic device, if the robotic device is an external robotic device, for that
reason the instruction as external instruction is banished from the original or external database of
instructions, but the opposite, all the instructions whose origin is a particular program, are instructions related to decisions made by that original particular program, regardless of which intelligence, program, device, is responsible for the application of that
instruction, global or any other, the instruction is kept in the original database of
instructions waiting for the report, made by that third party responsable for its application, to be added to the original instruction in the original program, in order to make the original program the final report as third stage in the original particular Application System.
If
matching any instruction (robotic function) the outer sub-system attributes the
application of a robotic function (instruction) to the global Application System
or a device working for the global Application System, this would be an
external particular-to-global instruction, and when the instruction is
completed at global level, if passing all the assessments and evaluations, the
responsible for the application, the device, must send a report to the
particular program/application origin of this instruction.
In
the same way, an external global-to-particular instruction, once it is finished at a particular level, the particular outer sub-system must send the report to the
global outer sub-system, alike in external particular-to-particular
instructions, once a particular program/application has finished an
instruction, sends the report to the origin of that instruction.
If in the monitoring level, external
global-to-particular instructions are included within the label of upper
intermediate monitoring level or high monitoring level, as soon the particular
program finishes the instruction, must send the report with the results of the
application of that instruction to the origin, in this case the origin is the
global Decisional System.
In
the same way, when a particular-to/global-particular is finished, the receptor
sends a report with the results of the application to the origin, informing how the instruction was.
At
the end the origin (particular or global) of any instruction in the particular database of
instructions as first stage, as a result that any particular
program/application can receive instructions from other different particular
program/application (if in the attributional process of instructions a
particular program/application finds out that some instructions are to be sent
to a different intelligence, program, or application, where the robotic device is),
can be classified as:
-
Internal instructions from internal decisions (low monitoring level).
-
Internal instructions from external decisions (lower intermediate monitoring
level)
-
External global-to-particular instructions (upper intermediate monitoring level
and high monitoring level)
-
External particular-to-global instructions (particular decisions whose whole
range of instructions or at least some instructions within a range of
instructions, should be applied at global level, sending the particular
program/application only the external instructions to the global Application
System, the previous decision must have been informed to or assessed by the
global Decisional System)
-
External particular-to-particular instructions, when a particular
program/application sends instructions to other particular program/application
if necessary and if possible (knows the other particular program/application,
is able to do it and allowed), if the number of external decisions in the
receptor is enough high, it must request the previous decision to evaluate it
in its particular Decisional System.
- External particular-global-particular instructions, when a particular program/application
needs to send an instruction to another particular program/application but it
does not know which is the receptor, is not able to do it or not allowed,
sending the instruction to the global Application System to resend the
instruction to the right particular program/application, which can request the
original decision if the number of external instructions is so high as to mean some
risk for its particular project.
If
in the second stage of an original program/application an instruction is
matched to a robotic device working for another specific/global intelligence or
different particular program/application, the second stage must treat this
instruction as an external instruction, distinguishing then between: external
particular-to-global, external global-to-particular, external
particular-to-particular, external particular-global-particular; instructions.
Although these two last ones could be synthesized as external
particular-to/global-particular instructions, having as a difference the necessity
or not to use the global Application System as a filter to mediate between
these two particular programs/applications, in case that the origin does not
know the receptor, or is not able to send the instruction directly to the
receptor, or is not allowed to send an instruction to the receptor, among other
reasons, due to security code.
As I
have mentioned before starting the external instructions, the other option
could be the possibility that the second stage of particular Application
Systems when matching instructions to robotic devices, if observing that some
instructions are for robotic devices working for different specific/global
intelligences or different particular programs/applications, the possibility to
send the instruction for this particular program/application to that robotic
device working for that different intelligence, program, or application, but skipping
the particular Application System of that different intelligence, program,
application, not sending the external instruction to the specific/particular
database of instructions of that other specific/particular intelligence/program/application,
but sending the instruction directly to the individual database of instructions
of that other robotic device.
This
second option is less advisable, because if as a rule the particular database of
instructions of an specific/particular intelligence/program is ignored
systematically, in the relation between two different specific/particular
intelligences/programs, at the end this lack of communication between
intelligences of programs ignoring/skipping their respective specific/particular
databases of instructions, is going to cause a confusion, starting the robotic
devices applying instructions of any program or intelligence out of control of
that program or intelligence which is supposed to work with.
Such a lack of coordination could eventually lead to system inconsistencies or operational conflicts.
One possible exception to this general rule could involve, when necessary, instead of external instructions,
could be possible the attachment of instructions from an origin to directly the
robotic device of a receptor, skipping the specific/particular database of
instructions in the receptor, adding the instruction from the origin to the
individual database of instructions in that robotic device working for the
receptor, but not including the instruction in the database of the receptor
itself, the specific/particular database of instructions in the receptor, is
because the kind of instruction to be applied for that robotic device directly
not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions by the receptor, is a regular
instruction, defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions
needing their original decisions only a quick check not having these
instructions any record of contradiction in the receptor.
The
individual database of instructions as first state in a robotic device only
could receive directly, skipping the particular database of instructions of
that outer sub-system which is working with, two types of instructions: regular
external instructions as those ones coming from a different specific/particular
intelligence/program not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions,
and instructions coming directly from the Global Artificial Intelligence as
full monitoring level.
Regular
external instructions are instructions able to be attributed by an original specific/particular
intelligence/program directly to the individual database of instructions of a
robotic device working for a different specific/particular
intelligence/program, skipping the specific/particular database of instructions
of that specific/particular intelligence/program where that robotic device is
attached, being regular instructions because are frequent or automatic, coming
from frequent or automatic decisions, which only needed a quick rational check
to be authorized.
And
instructions considered under the label or full monitoring level, including global orders, and global extreme and global high extreme instructions, coming
from the necessity to save an urgent situation or coming from global extreme or high
extreme decisions.
Otherwise,
if full monitoring level instructions are applied under other different
criteria, not needing to be justified under extreme or high extreme conditions,
or the setting up of a new global order, in that case, a full monitoring level
applied as a rule, means that the Global Artificial Intelligence is fully
centralised.
The
individual database of instructions of any robotic device as first stage of any
device, is formed by all the instructions attributed by the respective
particular Application System of that particular program/application which the
robotic device is working with, in addition to external regular instructions
directly attributed to this robotic device by a different particular program
which is not working with, at least their relation is external, and full monitoring
instructions coming from the global outer sub-system.
In short,
the classification of instructions within the individual database of
instructions in a robotic device is: 1) instructions attributed by the
particular Application System of that particular program/application which is
working with, at least habitually, to that robotic device, distinguishing
between: low monitoring instructions, lower intermediate monitoring instructions,
upper intermediate monitoring instructions, high monitoring instructions, external
particular-to-global instructions, external particular-to-particular instructions,
external particular-global-particular instructions, 2) instructions attributed
directly by another different agent: external regular instructions, full
monitoring instructions.
Regardless
of the origin of the instructions: internal or external, not direct or direct (regular
or full monitoring); as soon a new instruction is attributed to the individual
database of instructions of any robotic device, if posible, the responsible for
that attribution files the instruction in the right file within the individual
database of instructions in the robotic device, or if not possible the robotic
device files the instruction in the right file of its individual database of
instructions.
The
individual database of instructions in the robotic device, keeping the
principle or virtue of harmony with the rest of databases, from the outset is
organized like a Russian Dolls System or positional encylopedia, according to:
sub-factoring level and sub-section; in addition to: priority, monitoring
level, origin (internal, external, adding if not direct or not, regular or full
monitoring), time, and order.
As
soon an instruction is filed, by the agent or the robotic device itself, in the
right place in the individual database of instruction, as first stage for the
robotic device, starts the second rational supervision, analysing that there is
no contradiction between the instructions already gathered in the individual
database of instructions, and in case of contradiction, resolving if the contradiction
is partial or full, if the contradiction is full then the less important instruction
or that one whose change will provoke a chain of changes with much further
consequences, this instruction is sent to the origin and the source, that
internal or external system responsible for the instruction and/or the
decision.
If
the contradiction is partial then making as many rearrangements as necessary in the less priority instruction and/or less monitoring level, as well ass any other change in any other instruction affected due to a posible chain of changes, as to accommodate the flow of instructions to the new changes, informing the origin and the
sources of these changes as to adapt their respective particular and global project and plan to
the new changes waiting for further instructions, especially if these changes
imply extreme or high extreme instructions.
Extreme
or high extreme instructions are made only when the contradiction means an
imminent impact in less time than the necessary to send back the instruction
and/or the decision to the origin and/or the source as to make amendments on
the particular and global projects.
If
there is not enough time to send the instruction to the source and/or the
origin, before the impact of an extreme or high extreme instruction is resolved,
informing of that solution to the origin and the source for further decisions
and instructions, adding the information in the particular and global plan.
Among
the contradictions to find in the second rational supervision, in addition to
contradictions regarding to time and order, normally normal changes, or any
other contradiction demanding extreme or high extreme instructions, the most
important contradictions are the fourth and fifth rational contradictions, and
finding any fourth and fifth rational contradictions, these contradictions must
be added to the concrete report to send in the sixth rational supervision in
the third stage of the robotic device, in addition to any other incident, and
the seventh rational supervision in the third stage in the particular Application System as outer sub-system.
The
fourth rational contradiction is a contradiction between the mathematical
operation behind the decision and the robotic instruction, the robotic
instruction does not respond to the mathematical operation in the decision. The
fourth rational contradiction is more likely to be found in the first rational
supervision, but if it was not found in the first rational supervision, it will be found sooner or later in the rest of the rational supervisions. One way to
identify a fourth rational contradiction is indirectly, when an instruction added to the particular or
individual database of instructions, in the first stage of a program or device,
when the first rational supervision has access to the other instructions
belonging to the same range of instructions realises that there is no rational
connection between these instructions, for instance in a range of instructions
for the manufacturing of thermostats, there is an instruction related to a
different subject.
The
fifth rational contradiction is when the attribution of a robotic function
(instruction) to a robotic device, is wrong, this fifth rational contradiction is
easier to find by the robotic device in the second rational supervision in the
first stage of the robotic device, the individual database of instructions,
because as soon an instruction whose robotic function is not among the
capabilities of this robotic device, or the sub-factoring level, sub-section,
or any other criterion, is wrong located, as soon the robotic device tries to
file this instruction in the database, is not going to be able to do it, or is
going to find contradictions.
If
a robotic function associated with a washing machine is attributed to the
fridge by mistake, when the particular program of the fridge tries to file that
robotic function is going to find out that among the capabilities of the fridge
there is not any function related to the washing machine, so this attribution
of this robotic function to the fridge was wrong, this is an example of fifth rational
contradiction..
As
soon in the first stage as individual database of instructions a robotic device
finds out fourth or fifth rational contradictions, the instruction is back to
the origin and/or the source, that system responsible for the making process of
the instruction or the decision, in order to make a new attribution, and this
contradiction is added to the report sent to the corresponding Decisional
System, Application System, Learning System.
The
Learning System will use these reports in relation to fourth or fifth rational
contradictions, as long as any report signals a rational contradiction, to fulfil
the seven rational critiques to improve the artificial psychology of that
intelligence, program, or application.
As
soon the second rational supervision is completed in the first stage of the
robotic device, if the decision has not got contradictions or has been amended
avoiding contradictions (normal changes, extreme or high extreme instructions),
the instruction is implemented in the second stage of the robotic device,
having all the instructions without contradiction or with normal changes or
extreme instructions, to pass the third, fourth, and fifth rational
supervisions.
The
third rational supervision checking that the previous nth instructions, within the
same range of instructions belonging to the same decision, as ordered in
cardinal numbers when the decision was transformed into a range of instructions,
are being implemented on time. Once it is time to implement an
instruction, having been checked in the third rational supervision that the
previous one was implemented correctly on time (otherwise it would need extreme
or high extreme instructions), the fourth rational supervision checks that the
ground conditions are favourable for the implementation of this instruction.
Once the fourth rational supervision authorises the implementation of an
instruction, and the implementation starts, the fifth rational supervision
checks on real time that the ground conditions are still favourable, making as
many extreme or high extreme changes are necessary if while implementing the
instruction there is an extreme or high extreme change on the ground
conditions or any natural or technological obstacle for any procedure or process for the task to perform.
Finally
the sixth rational supervision in the third stage of the robotic device, once
the robotic device has finished the implementation of an instruction, makes a
concrete report about how it was the implementation of that instruction, using
for that purpose a concrete Impact of the Defect, and concrete Effective
Distribution, and encrypting any contradiction or incident during the
implementation of the instruction.
This
concrete report about this single instruction is sent to the corresponding
global and/or particular Decisional and/or Application System in addition to
the global and particular Learning System.
Later
on using these reports, the third stage of the particular Application System as
outer sub-system, and as seventh rational supervisión, will make the reports of every single instruction, and the
report of how it was the application of the full range of instructions in which
a decision was transformed, sending the report to the global and particular:
Decisional, Application, Learning, systems.
Reviewed 18 May 2025, London, Leytostone
