Particular Application System, third stage

In the third stage the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system makes the seventh rational supervision, consisting of the report about the performance of every instruction applied, having as sources of information the previous report sent by the robotic devices as third stage in the robotic devices.

The particular Application System as outer sub-system, as any other intelligence, program, or application, is organised in three stages, the first one as application is the particular database of instructions, the second one the replication of all the cognitive human skills to perform the instructions, the third one as auto-replication the elaboration of reports which are later sent to the Learning System , in addition to the Decisional System, to make improvements over the results obtained during the performance.

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, as replication of all the human psychological skills to perform the instructions, the first psychological skill to replicate is the possibility to attribute every instruction (robotic function) to the right robotic device, in the same way that our brain attribute actions to our muscles, or in the same way that while working we attribute functions to our tools.

Once the particular Application System as outer sub-system attributes every instruction to a robotic device, the way in which the robotic device is going to perform the instruction is through a similar organization in three stages, the first one as application the individual database of instructions assigned to this device, the second one the performance of the instruction according to the capabilities of this device, and final  as third stage as soon the performance of the instruction is finished, the elaboration of a concrete report of every single instruction using for that purpose a concrete Impact of the Defect and a concrete Effective Disrtribution.

The concrete report as a result of the third stage of the robotic device is sent to, depending on what type of instruction is, the source of every instruction, having every instruction possible different sources, some of them internal, others external, and among the external, direct instructions to the robotic device skipping the particular Application System.

In general, according to the classification of instructions in the individual database of instructions as first stage of the robotic device, the source to whom sends the concrete report, are:

- If internal instruction, the robotic device sends the concrete report to that particular Application System for which it works.

- If external regular instruction , the robotic device sends the concrete report to that other different particular Application System which sent the instruction directly to that robotic device, skipping the particular Application Program for which this device works.

- Full monitoring instructions, the robotic device sends the concrete report directly to the global Application System.

In short, depending on the origin of the instructions, internal or external, the robotic device sends the concrete reports to different agents. Only when the origin of the instruction is internal the robotic device sends the concrete report to the particular Application for which is working, otherwise sends the concrete report to a different agent, another different particular Application System if external regular instruction, or the global Application System if full monitoring level instruction.

Because the particular Application System has the possibility to match instructions to: 1) its own robotic devices (internal instructions), or 2) robotic devices working for another different particular program/application (external instructions), within the external instructions, has the option to send, 2.1) external instructions directly to that external robotic device (advisable only for external regular instructions), or 2.2) instructions to that other particular Application System (particular-to-particular instructions) to manage the external instruction including it in its particular database of instructions (only if the origin is able to or allow to send instructions to that other program/application), or 2.3) instructions to the global Application System, because only robotic devices working at global level can perform the instruction (particular-to-global), or 2.4) because this particular program/application is not able to or allow to send the instruction to that other particular program/application, and send the instruction to the global Application System waiting that it resends the instruction to the particular Application System receptor.

In sum, the instructions could be: internal or external; if external: not skipping the particular Application System receptor, or skipping the particular System receptor. If external and not skipping the receptor: particular-to-particular, particular-to-global, particular-global-particular; if external and skipping the receptor: external regular instructions and full monitoring instructions.

According to this classification the concrete reports that the particular Application System can receive are reports from those actors responsable for the application of the instructions. as long as it sends instructions to different agents: its own robotic devices (internal instructions), the global Application System to perform the instruction at global level (particular-to-global), different particular Application Systems (particular-to-particular), the global Application System to resend the instruction to the right particular Application System (particular-global-particular), directly to robotic devices working for different programs/applications (external regular instructions).

And according to this classification, the particular Application System should not receive any concrete report of those instructions performed by its own robotic devices, but sent by other agent skipping this particular Application System: 1) when the robotic devices of a particular Application System receives an external regular instruction, the robotic devices should not communicate the concrete report to their own particular Application System, only to that other different particular Application System origin of this external instruction, and 2) in full monitoring instructions, the robotic devices send the concrete report directly to the global Application System, no their own particular Application System.

This means that when an instruction has not been included in the first stage of the particular Application System as particular database of instructions, if there is no record of an external instruction in the particular database of instructions, because it was skipped by that other different agent, sending that other different agent the instruction directly to these robotic devices, these robotic devices do not have to send any concrete report to their own particular Application System because there is no record of that external decision in the particular database of instruction, sending only the robotic devices the report to that other different agent, global or that other different particular program/application whose global or particular database of instructions has records of this external instruction performed by these robotic devices.

The robotic devices only should communicate the reception of that direct external instruction, skipping the particular database of instructions in the particular outer sub-system, if it is an external extreme or high extreme instruction, or full monitoring instruction coming up from extreme or high extreme global decisions, or a new global order, which is going to interfere with the performance of other internal or external instructions whose priority level is not as high as these ones, able to cause further changes in the particular program, as soon these direct external instructions to the device are performed.

Only external direct instructions to devices as extreme or high extreme external instructions or related to external extreme or high extreme decisions, or new global orders, should be communicated to the particular Application System for which habitually the devices are working, otherwise external regular instructions or full monitoring instructions not interfering with the particular plan, do not have to be communicated to the particular Application System.

One important reason why under some circumstances direct external instructions to devices is a good option, especially when the security of the device and the program is completely assured, as for instance in regular instructions or full monitoring instructions, is the fact that as long as some instructions can avoid their inclusion in the particular database of instructions in the particular Application System, being added directly on the individual database of instructions in the device, this different process not managed by the particular program/application directly, as direct external instructions to the device, can avoid the funnel effect on the particular database of instructions as first stage of the outer sub-system.

What is important to realise is the fact that my proposal for the construction of a Global Artificial Intelligence, is the first one at this level, what I am doing is only to apply at global level what I have developed before, since 2001(Impact of the Defect), 2002 ((New Humanity, astro-ecology, and my studies about Venus, and later on the Second Method), 2003 (Yolanda and all my writings about trigonometry), 2009-2011 (Introduction to Impossible Probability), and since 2017, the objective to create non human pure operations, starting with artificial research, by deduction and by application.

This is important to highlight because as long as I am progressing in my proposal for the Global Artificial Intelligence, I am introducing new ideas, new methods of analysis, new suggestions, being aware that the construction of such a machine, Mother, is going to need lots of professionals making contributions from different fields, especially linking mathematics and psychology.

Mother like Me is going to be a mathematical design where every day we are going to put a new brick, a new idea, a new stone, in the construction of something that is going to transform the world, for that reason is important to be flexible, and ready to change your mind as soon you realise that some idea that you had got yesterday, when applying it, it can cause some difficulties, or it could be bettered by new approaches coming from different disciplines.

In my last post, for instance, I had suggested the possibility to avoid as much as possible external direct instructions to the devices unless these external direct instructions to the devices are regular instructions or full monitoring instructions, among these last ones able to include new global orders, and extreme and high extreme global instructions.

But what today I have realised is the possibility that the normalization and standardization of external direct regular instructions to devices, complying with all the security protocols to protect the devices and the particular plan (synthesis of the particular model and particular project), what  these external direct regular instructions to devices are going to facilitate, is to avoid the funnel effect on the particular database of instructions in the particular outer sub-system, redirecting directly the instructions to the individual database of instruction in the device, what could make faster the process for those regular instructions with low risk.

In any case, when a robotic device during the supervision or performance of any external direct instruction, regular or full monitoring, realises that it could have further contradictions with the internal instructions, or any other external instruction included in the particular database of instructions, being contradictions which might need extreme or high extreme instructions, made directly from the device, or need to be made by the outer sub-system, as soon these contradictions are observed, should be communicated with its outer sub-system to solve the situation saving any contradiction affecting its particular plan.

Unless an external direct instruction to a device, regular or full monitoring, is communicated to the particular Application System for which the device is working, the particular Application System as outer sub-system would not need the concrete report of external direct instructions received by devices.

The third stage of the particular Application System is going to work only with the  concrete reports, as third stage of the devices, sent to the third stage of the particular Application System, being concrete reports: 1) either attached to instructions previously included and managed from the first stage in the particular database of instructions, or 2) concrete reports made by the devices regarding to external direct instructions which needed to be communicated to the particular outer sub-system due to further contradictions with the particular plan or other external instructions within the particular database of instructions and matched to that robotic device.

As soon the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system receives the concrete reports, starts working on the seventh rational supervision, whose result is to make the seventh singular rational supervision for every single instruction in the particular database of instruction, seventh comprehensive rational supervision taking as a whole the concrete reports of all the instructions within the same range of instructions belonging to the same decision, and the seventh total rational supervision.

The seventh singular rational supervision made in the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system consists of:

- The  concrete report sent by the robotic device, based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution, including any contradiction in the second, third, fifth, rational supervisions.

 - Any contradiction found in the first rational supervision as first stage, among them the most important the identification of fourth rational contradictions (contradiction between the mathematical operation behind the decision and the instruction, this could be identifiable by indirect ways, for instance, within a range of instructions destined to one subject, the inclusion of instructions for a very different subject).

- Once the instruction is matched with a device in the second stage of the outer sub-system, if there has been committed a fifth rational contradiction (between instruction and robotic device, fifth rational contradiction that must be reflected as well in the concrete report of that device which sent back the instruction), as soon the robotic device sends back the instruction to the second stage of the outer sub-system, the instruction is re-attributed to the right device, incident that should be reflected on the seventh singular report.

- If as a result of the attributional process the instruction is matched to different programs or external devices,  working as an external instruction (particular-to-global, particular-to/global-particular) or an external direct regular instruction, assessing how this attributional process worked in all levels, the collaboration between particular/global, particular/particular, and the level of performance of the collaboration itself, in addition to the level of performance during the implementation of the instruction itself.

All possible incident, contradiction, impact, error, mistake, lack of efficiency, happening during the performance of any instruction by a robotic device, must be encoded, encrypted and added as a concrete category of error in the concrete list of errors in the concrete Impact of the Defect or concrete Effective Distribution, as to make the concrete report  that in the third stage the device must send to the respective particular Application System.

In addition to the concrete report, any incident, contradiction, impact, error, mistake, lack of efficiency identified in the first supervision or matching instructions and devices, must be encoded, encrypted and added to the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution, so as to get an encoded and encrypted assessment of the processes done during the first and second stage, to add to the particular report.

The seventh singular rational supervision consists of: 1) the concrete report made by the device based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution, plus 2) the particular report made by the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system assessing how this single instruction was managed in the first and second stage of the particular Application System.

The seventh singular rational supervision of any single instruction, is the synthesis of the information obtained by the concrete report of this single instruction made by the device responsible of the performance of this instruction, using the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution of that device, plus the particular report that the particular Application System as outer sub-system can make applying the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution, particular to the third stage of this outer sub-system, to assess how was the management of any instruction in the particular database of instructions as first stage of the particular Application System, and how was the attributional process in the second stage of the particular Application System.

The seventh comprehensive rational supervision consists of, instead of the evaluation or every instruction individually, the evaluation of the whole brunch of instructions belonging to the same range of instructions from the same decision, evaluating as a whole:

- Evaluation of the management in the first stage, how was the first rational supervision as a whole for the instructions of the same decision, any contradiction in the first rational supervision, or even an evaluation of any incident, error, mistake during the process to file every instruction in the right file in the particular database of instructions, encoding and encrypting in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution any error, mistake, problem, in any part of the process.

- Evaluation of the management of all the instructions from the same decision in the second stage, encoding and encrypting in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect or comprehensive Effective Distribution any error, mistake, contradiction, incident, during the management of the whole brunch of decisions during the attributional process or during the performance of these instructions from the same decision from one or more different devices, working for this particular Application System (internal instructions), or for different Application Systems (external instructions), regardless of their level, global or particular, or how was the attribution of external direct instructions to devices from other programs.

The difference between the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution and the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution, is the fact that the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution are focused on particular categories of error or efficiency related to how was the management of every single instruction separately, as single identities. While the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution are focused on categories of error or efficiency related to the management of the whole brunch of instructions related to the same decision.

While the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution can work on categories of error or efficiency related to single instructions, for instance categories of error or efficiency related to single internal instructions, categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions, not direct and direct, distinguishing between:

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-to-global instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-to-particular instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-global-particular instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external direct regular instructions.

While the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution only have categories of error or mistake to analyse the management of every instruction, including specifically categories of error or efficiency to analyse individually internal and external instructions, analysing individually, one by one: particular-to-global, particular-to-particular, particular-global-particular, external direct regular instructions.

The comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution should include categories of error or efficiency about the whole management of a whole range of instructions from the same decision, whose instruction can have a great diversity, including internal and external instructions, and as external instructions particular-to-particular and/or particular-to/global-particular and/or regular instructions.

Another difference between the particular report for every particular instruction as a result of the seventh singular rational supervision, and the comprehensive report for a whole range of instructions from the same decision as a result of the seventh comprehensive rational supervision is the fact that those external instructions included in the particular database of instructions as receptor, but whose decision is located in another different program or the Global Artificial Intelligence itself as original source, as long this particular Application System as outer sub-system receptor is not managing the whole range of instructions of this external instruction in its particular database, therefore the particular database of instructions as receptor only has some external instructions related to that decision made in other original program, because the particular Application System of this program/application as receptor is not managing the whole range of instructions of that decisión, whose origin is external, the receptor can not make the seventh comprehensive rational supervision of external instructions whose original decision was made by another external program. As a receptor of that external instruction, the particular Application System as receptor only will make a seventh singular rational supervision, to send later to the origin of that instruction, and is the original program , having received the report sent by the receptor, then the original program is responsible of that seventh comprehensive rational supervision including that external instruction attributed to that different program as receptor.

For that reason, not all instruction in a particular database of instructions will be part of a seventh comprehensive rational supervision, those external instructions located within a particular program/application as receptor, the receptor is not responsible for the seventh rational supervision of that range of instructions where is located this external instruction, the receptor only makes the seventh singular rational supervision to send to the original source of this instruction, global or particular.

In the same way, not all instruction included in the particular database of instructions will be object of a seventh total rational supervision, due to this supervision is the synthesis of the seventh singular and the seventh comprehensive rational supervision. Synthesising in a total Impact of the Defect the categories of error stated in the concrete list of errors in the concrete Impact of the Defect, and the particular list of errors in the particular Impact of the Defect, and the comprehensive list of errors in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect,  to make a total Impact of the Defect. And synthesising the concrete, particular, and comprehensive list of categories of efficiency in the concrete, particular, comprehensive Effective Distribution to create the total Effective Distribution, as a synthesis of these last ones.

The seventh total rational supervision is the synthesis of the seventh comprehensive rational supervision and the seventh singular rational supervision, this last one in turn synthesis of the concrete report and the particular report, concrete report based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution used by the concrete device to make the sixth rational supervision, and particular report as a result to synthesis the concrete report with the evaluation made in the third stage of the particular Application System, using the particular Impact of the Defect and particular Effective Distribution, evaluating individually the management of every single instruction in the particular database of instructions and the individual result of the first rational supervision in every individual instruction, and how was individually the attribution of every instruction to their respective, internal or external, device.

The comprehensive Impact of the Defect must include all categories of error related to the whole management of a brunch of instructions, related to the same decisión, within the first and second stages in the particular Application System, and the comprehensive Effective Distribution categories of efficiency related to the management of the whole brunch of instructions, related to the same decisión, within the first and second stages in the particular Application System.

The seventh total rational supervision is a general statement, encoded and encrypted, synthesising how in general all instruction at concrete and individual level was performed, and how in general the whole brunch of instructions from the same decision was performed.

As soon every seventh rational supervision: singular, comprehensive, total; is done, is sent by the third stage of the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system to the corresponding source or origin. Logically, due to the seventh total rational supervision is the synthesis of the seventh singular and comprehensive rational supervisions, these are the first one to be completed, and the seventh total rational supervision is the last one, and as soon as every one of them is finished, not needing to wait the completion of the three seventh rational supervisions, the reports are sent to the source or origin of every individual, internal or external, instruction, particular/global Decisional/Application System, and their corresponding particular/global Learning System.

One reason to send the reports to the Decisional Systems, is to make further decisions If necessary, if the results could provoke some consequences on the particular project, turning the decisions already completed off the project, as soon all the instructions regarding to the same decision are finished. If the reports are sent to a different Application or Decisional System, instead to its own Decisional System, is because is an external instruction, and as soon that the receptor makes its respective reports, sending the reports to the original Decisional System, the decision will be off that original project, in addition to further decisions that that project could make according to the results.

The importance to send the reports to the right Learning System, depending on what type of instruction or brunch of instructions it is, is because the Learning System will use these reports to fulfil the rational critiques, and to track with its own model of Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution the whole process and how that intelligence, program, application, works.

According to the source or origin of an instruction the report are sent to:

- Low monitoring instructions, the third stage of the particular Application System sends the seventh rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional and Learning Systems.

- Lower intermediate monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional and Learning Systems (although the origin of the decision is the global Modelling System, all the process of how to distribute the decision into instructions was made at particular level).

- Upper intermediate monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional System, having as an option to send the results as well to the global Decisional  System and global Learning System (the decision was managed first by the global Decisional System and communicated to the particular Decisional System).

- High monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to the global Decisional System and global Learning System.

- Particular-to/global-particular instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular supervisions to that other particular program/application, sending these supervisions to the particular Decisional System and particular Learning System of this other program.

- In case that external direct instructions to devices, skipping firstly the particular database of instructions, was later communicated to the particular database of instructions to research for contradictions in case that it could interfere with the particular plan, according to the origin of this external direct instructions, global or particular, seventh singular rational instructions could be sent to the Decisional System and Learning System of that source, global or particular.

The first and most important result of the completion of every instruction, and the final completion of all the instructions related to the same decision, completing the decision, is the fact that that decision was created to protect or better that reality for what the decision, and the instructions, were made, and for that reason only completing instructions and decisions, the particular Application System as third step in the third stage in the fifth phase is part of the auto-replication process in particular programs/applications, because completing these instructions is able to complete decisions able to secure and improve the program.

Every time that the program is protected and improved by itself, is a real objective auto-replication of the program, because the program is able to protect itself and able to improve itself. The self of the program is able to better the program by itself, and this is a real auto-replication of the program.

For that reason the particular Application System is the third step within the third stage of the program, being the third stage the auto-replication stage, at particular level that stage responsible for the auto-replication of the program, being able to secure and enhance the program.

As knowledge objective auto-replication should considered any change in any rational hypothesis as a consequence that as soon an instruction is about to be applied, but in the rational supervisions is found a full contradiction, not being possible to adapt the inferior instructions, therefore the inferior instruction is back to the source, firstly the particular Decisional System trying to rearrange the instruction, and if not possible sending back the decision to the particular Modelling System, if the rearrangement in the particular Modelling System of a decision based on Probability and Deduction, means that it is necessary to make changes in the rational hypothesis, this change in the rational hypothesis is a explicative knowledge objective auto-replication.

If the rational hypothesis object of a change, is a rational hypothesis which was transformed into factor as an option in the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix, or a range of factors distributed in discrete categories in the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix, as long as an explicative knowledge auto-replication is made on that rational hypothesis is necessary to reflect these changes in the corresponding factors related to this rational hypothesis on the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix.

If this rational hypothesis was transformed into a conceptual category within the conceptual hemisphere of the particular matrix, any change in any conceptual category is a comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replication.

In the same way, if due to the seventh rational supervision sent to the a Learning System, the Learning System realises a significant number of fourth or fifth rational contradictions, the Learning System could fix the attributional process, identifying the common causes of these wrong attributions, making as many changes as necessary in the mechanism, as  artificial psychology, responsible for these wrong attributions, what it would be considered as an artificial psychological subjective auto-replication. In this case, the Learning System should identify the reason of the wrong attribution, making a project of how to improve the mechanism of this attribution, send it to the Artificial Engineering as inner sub-system, which send the project to the Decisional System to be authorised, and as soon is authorised, the Designer of Artificial Intelligence, as part of the Artificial Engineering, makes the improvements.

If during the performance of any instruction, the attribution is right, so the artificial psychology is working, but the problem is any robotic aspect of any device, not working properly, the Learning System inform the Intelligent Robotic Mechanic, as part of the Artificial Engineering, to fix it, being this improvement a robotic subjective auto-replication.

 Ruben García Pedraza, 15 December 2019, London

Particular Application System, second stage

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system is that one where the instructions already gathered in the particular database of instructions, first stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, having passed the first rational assessment, are going to be matched to the right robotic device working for this particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, filing the Application System as outer sub-system the instruction in the right file according to: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority, monitoring level, time, order; within the individual database of instructions as first stage for that particular robotic device. Adding, as I will explain, a new criterion more, origin internal or external.

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system in the fifth phase, alike the second stage in the specific Application System in the first phase, and the standardized Application System as outer sub-system in the third phase, consists mainly of the attributional process matching every instruction (robotic function) with the right robotic device, attributing in the fifth phase every robotic function (instruction) with the right robotic device working for this particular program, particular application, particular program for particular application.

If there is an instruction, whose responsible to match, is a robotic device not working for this particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, and the robotic device responsible for the application of that instruction is a robotic device working for the Global Artificial Intelligence itself or any other residual specific intelligence, or new different particular program, application, or particular program for particular application, in that case, in the same way that in the distribution of decisions in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence are catalogued as external decisions those ones which coming from a particular Modelling System are decisions to be applied by the integrated Decisional System, or sent to the integrated Decisional System to be resent to the right particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, then if there is an instruction in the particular outer sub-system whose responsible is not any robotic device working for this particular program, application, particular program for particular application, this instruction should be treated as an external instruction and sent to that specific or global intelligence, or program or application, responsible for that robotic device, able to apply this instruction as external instruction.

Otherwise, the other option could be, skipping the specific or global intelligence, particular program or application, responsible for that device, the particular program/application origin of this instruction could send directly the external instruction to that device, but this other option would have some problems, especially when the robotic device able to carry out this instruction works for the Global Artificial Intelligence, or for another program/application where the inclusion of an instruction coming from another different program/application directly  to another different program/application can produce some confusion, for instance robotic devices working for cyborgs, if receiving orders from more than one program if not assessed before the lack of contradiction between programs, more than one program not assessing possible contradictions sending instructions to the same robotic device can cause further difficulties.

The possibility that particular programs/applications could send external instructions directly to robotic devices working for different specific/global intelligence or program/applications, is a possibility that should be restricted only to regular instructions to those specific/global intelligence or program/particular, defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions needing their original decisions a quick check not having these instructions any record of contradiction in the receptor.

Instead, what it should be more advisable when in the application of the instruction the origin and the receptor are not the same, not skipping the receptor intelligence or program/application, to treat the external instruction in the receptor database of instructions as an external instruction.

There are different types of external instructions:

- An external particular-to-global instruction, sent by a particular program, application, or particular program for a particular application, to the global outer sub-system, to be applied by robotic devices working for the global outer sub-system. In this case because previously the decisions in which this instruction has been based, is a decision informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System, the global outer sub-system would not need to pass more assessments rather than the rational supervisions.

- An external global-to-particular instruction, sent by the Global Artificial Intelligence to the particular outer sub-system, these ones corresponds to the upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level..

- An external particular-to-particular instruction, an instruction made by a particular program, application, particular program for particular application, to be applied by another different particular program, application, particular program for particular application.

In this last case, particular-to-particular, in addition to the particular assessments of the original decision in the particular Decisional System, and according to their nature, only informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System, and passing the first and second rational supervision in the particular Application System origin of this instruction, there are two options:

-The particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction knows what other particular program/application is responsible to apply this external instruction and is able to send the instruction to this different particular program/application. In this first scenery this is a real particular-to-particular.

- The particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction does not know what other particular program/application could apply this instruction, or is not able (for instance due to robotic problems), or is not allowed (for instance, security codes) to apply this instruction, therefore it sends the external instruction to the global outer sub-system to resend the instruction to the right application. In this case, this is an external particular-global-particular instruction.

In any case, either particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular, once the external instruction is received by that new different particular program/application (particular program, particular application, particular program for particular application), this different particular program, application, particular program for particular application (particular program/application), must pass at least the seventh rational supervisions before the application of that particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular instruction.

If the number of external instructions to apply by this third particular program/application is a significant number of external instructions (belonging to the same or different decisions, coming from the same origin or different origins), this different particular program/application, not only should pass the seven rational supervisions, should pass the corresponding assessment, quick or rational adjustment, in the original decisions of these instructions, because if a particular outer sub-system has to apply a significant number of decisions (coming from the same/different decisions/programs), a significant number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions can interfere in the particular plan of this particular program/application

Therefore when the number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions, coming from different/same decision/origin is equal to or greater than a critical reason, the program/application receptor not only has to assess the external instruction, but to include the original decision in its particular database of decisions (first stage particular Decisional System) to be assessed and evaluate any possible interference with its particular plan, applying for that reason on that decision  the quick rational check or seven rational adjustments according to what type of decision it is, in addition to the seven rational supervisions to these external particular-to/global-particular instructions.

In synthesis the four types of external instructions are: particular-to-global, global-to-particular, particular-to-particular, particular-global-particular. These two last ones, having as origin a particular program/application and having as responsible another particular program/application, have as only difference if the instructions need to have as a filter the global outer sub-system, in general these two last ones could be integrated as external particular-to/global-particular instructions.

External particular-to-particular instruction when the origin, the original particular program/application which made the instruction, knows and is able and allow to send directly instructions to another different particular program.

External particular-global-particular instruction, when the origin, the original particular program/application which made the instruction, does not know, and/or is not able, or is not allowed to send directly an external instruction to that other particular program/application (for instance due to security codes), sending that external instruction firstly to the global outer sub-system to later resend the external instruction to the right particular program/application.

In general, the evaluations to do in external instructions vary according to the different types. In particular-to-global, because previously the decision was informed or assessed at global level, at global level an external particular-to-global instruction only needs to pass the global rational supervisions.

External global-to-particular instructions are instructions with upper intermediate monitoring level or high monitoring level.

And in particular-to/global-particular, if the number of external instructions to be applied for the receptor is low, the instructions only need the rational supervisions in the receptor, in addition to the first rational supervision in the origin. Only when the number of external instructions in the receptor is equal to or greater than a critical number, the receptor should request the original decisions of these instructions, to be included in the particular Decisional System of the receptor to pass the quick rational check or the seven rational adjustments, to evaluate any possible interference between external decisions/instructions and its own internal decisions/instructions.

For that reason when any external particular-to/global-particular instruction is sent to a particular program/application receptor, the firs evaluation that the receptor should do is to evaluate how many instructions from the same/different decision/origin are active in the receptor, if there is a critical number or more, the original decisions, and not only the external instructions, must pass the particular evaluation in the receptor, in case of external decisions applying the quick check or rational adjustments in the particular Decisional System of that particular program/application receptor.

If a critical number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions demand the evaluation of the original decisions by the particular Decisional System of the program/application receptor, once the decision passes the assessment in the particular Decisional System receptor, the external instructions can be processed by the receptor Application System, starting filing the external decisions in the right file in the particular database of instructions in the receptor, according to: position, subject, priority, monitoring level, origin (in this case external, signalling the original program), time, and order; in order to start the rational supervisions.

If the number of external instructions is not so high, the receptor only passes the rational supervisions in the particular Application System, filing the external particular-to/global-particular instructions in its particular database of instructions, to be analysed in the first supervision according to: sub-factoring level (no contradiction with any other instruction in this or any other sub-factoring level in the particular application/program), sub-section (more specifically, no contradiction respect to any other instruction within its own subject), priority (adaptation rule in case of contradiction, the less priority is adapted to the superior instruction), monitoring level (having two contradictory decisions the same priority, the one with lower monitoring level is adapted to that one with higher monitoring level), time (if contradiction about when an instruction is applied, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme or high extreme instructions), nth order within the range of instructions (if contradiction, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme or high extreme instructions).

Due to the importance that external decisions can have, in the criteria for the organization of the database: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority, monitoring level, time, order; it would be necessary to include as  a new criterion more the origin: internal or external, and if external, signalling the original program of the original decision/instruction.

All instructions related to decisions made by a particular Modelling System (low level), or having been made by the global Modelling System, are assessed by a particular Decisional System (lower and upper intermediate level), or  having been processed by the global Decisional System, are directly sent to a particular Application System (high level) all of these instructions, regardless of the source (particular/global Modelling/Decisional system) are included in the particular database of instructions.

Among all these instructions, upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level are considered external global-to-particular instructions. Lower intermediate monitoring level are not global-to-particular instructions really because as soon the global Modelling System sends the decision to the particular Decisional System, this decision belongs to the particular project, the way in which this decision belonging to the particular project has been distributed in robotic functions in the third stage of the particular Decisional System, depends on how the particular Decisional System has projected the decision.

For that reason, in the particular database of decisions as first stage in the particular Decisional System, a decision sent by the global Modelling System to the particular Decisional System could be considered as an external global decision in the particular database of decisions, but once this decision is a responsibility for the particular Decisional System, making the project and the distribution of the decision into instructions, the resulting instructions are as a result of a particular process in the particular Decisional System, so these instructions are not external instructions anymore, the decision was external but the instruction making process upon the global decision is an internal process, so these instructions are internal, so any mistake in the elaboration of the instructions is an internal error, not external error, is internal to the particular Decisional System

This means that in low monitoring level the decisions and the instructions are internal, in lower intermediate monitoring level the decisions are global-external but the instructions internal, in upper intermediate and high monitoring level the decisions and the instructions are global-external. And in addition to global-external decisions and global-external instructions, in combinations of internal decisions, global-external decisions, internal instructions, global external instructions, is necessary to add particular-external decisions (particular-to/global-particular decisions) and particular-external instructions (particular-to/global-particular instructions).

Global-external decisions, when the particular database of decisions has to manage decisions coming from the global Modelling System (lower intermediate level), or coming from the global Decisional System (upper intermediate and high level). Global-external instructions when the particular database of instructions has to manage instructions coming from the global Decisional System (upper intermediate and high level). Sets of internal/external global/particular decisions/instruction to add the particular-to/global-particular instructions.

The importance of these classifications, as many more that can be done as soon the first projects on Global Artificial Intelligence start emerging in coming years, is the fact that, regardless of the source or origin of any decision or instruction, as soon an instruction is gathered in a database of instructions (regardless of the origin), not because when matching the instruction to the corresponding robotic device, if the robotic device is an external robotic device, for that reason the instruction as external instruction is banished from the original or external database of instructions, but the opposite, all the instructions whose origin is a particular program, are instructions related to decisions made by that original particular program, regardless of which intelligence, program, device, is  responsible for the application of that instruction, global or any other, the instruction is kept in the original database of instructions waiting for the report, made by that third party responsable for its application, to be added to the original instruction in the original program, in order to make the original program the final report as third stage in the original particular Application System.

If matching any instruction (robotic function) the outer sub-system attributes the application of a robotic function (instruction) to the global Application System or a device working for the global Application System, this would be an external particular-to-global instruction, and when the instruction is completed at global level, if passing all the assessments and evaluations, the responsible for the application, the device, must send a report to the particular program/application origin of this instruction.

In the same way, an external global-to-particular instruction, once is finished at particular level, the particular outer sub-system must send the report to the global outer sub-system, alike in external particular-to-particular instructions, once a particular program/application has finished an instruction, sends the report to the origin of that instruction.

 If in the monitoring level, external global-to-particular instructions are included within the label of upper intermediate monitoring level or high monitoring level, as soon the particular program finishes the instruction, must send the report with the results of the application of that instruction to the origin, in this case the origin is the global Decisional System.

In the same way, when a particular-to/global-particular is finished, the receptor sends a report with the results of the application to the origin, informing how was the instruction.

At the end the origin (particular or global) of any instruction in the particular database of instructions as first stage, as a result that any particular program/application can receive instructions from other different particular program/application (if in the attributional process of instructions a particular program/application finds out that some instructions are to be sent to a different intelligence, program, or application, where the robotic device is), can be classified as:

- Internal instructions from internal decisions (low monitoring level).

- Internal instructions from external decisions (lower intermediate monitoring level)

- External global-to-particular instructions (upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level)

- External particular-to-global instructions (particular decisions whose whole range of instructions or at least some instructions within a range of instructions, should be applied at global level, sending the particular program/application only the external instructions to the global Application System, the previous decision must have been informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System)

- External particular-to-particular instructions, when a particular program/application sends instructions to other particular program/application if necessary and if possible (knows the other particular program/application, is able to do it and allowed), if the number of external decisions in the receptor is enough high, it must request the previous decision to evaluate it in its particular Decisional System.

- External particular-global-particular instructions, when a particular program/application needs to send an instruction to another particular program/application but it does not know which is the receptor, is not able to do it or not allowed, sending the instruction to the global Application System to resend the instruction to the right particular program/application, which can request the original decision if the number of external instructions is so high as to mean some risk for its particular project.

If in the second stage of an original program/application an instruction is matched to a robotic device working for another specific/global intelligence or different particular program/application, the second stage must treat this instruction as an external instruction, distinguishing then between: external particular-to-global, external global-to-particular, external particular-to-particular, external particular-global-particular; instructions. Although these two last ones could be synthesized as external particular-to/global-particular instructions, having as a difference the necessity or not to use the global Application System as a filter to mediate between these two particular programs/applications, in case that the origin does not know the receptor, or is not able to send the instruction directly to the receptor, or is not allowed to send an instruction to the receptor, among other reasons, due to security code.

As I have mentioned before starting the external instructions, the other option could be the possibility that the second stage of particular Application Systems when matching instructions to robotic devices, if observing that some instructions are for robotic devices working for different specific/global intelligences or different particular programs/applications, the possibility to send the instruction for this particular program/application to that robotic device working for that different intelligence, program, or application, but skipping the particular Application System of that different intelligence, program, application, not sending the external instruction to the specific/particular database of instructions of that other specific/particular intelligence/program/application, but sending the instruction directly to the individual database of instructions of that other robotic device.

This second option is less advisable, because if as a rule the particular database of instructions of an specific/particular intelligence/program is ignored systematically, in the relation between two different specific/particular intelligences/programs, at the end this lack of communication between intelligences of programs ignoring/skipping their respective specific/particular databases of instructions, is going to cause a confusion, starting the robotic devices applying instructions of any program or intelligence out of control of that program or intelligence which is supposed to work with.

This lack of communication sooner or later would end up in a collapse.

The only situation in which, when necessary, instead of external instructions, could be possible the attachment of instructions from an origin to directly the robotic device of a receptor, skipping the specific/particular database of instructions in the receptor, adding the instruction from the origin to the individual database of instructions in that robotic device working for the receptor, but not including the instruction in the database of the receptor itself, the specific/particular database of instructions in the receptor, is because the kind of instruction to be applied for that robotic device directly not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions by the receptor, is a regular instruction, defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions needing their original decisions only a quick check not having these instructions any record of contradiction in the receptor.

The individual database of instructions as first state in a robotic device only could receive directly, skipping the particular database of instructions of that outer sub-system which is working with, two types of instructions: regular external instructions as those ones coming from a different specific/particular intelligence/program not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions, and instructions coming directly from the Global Artificial Intelligence as full monitoring level.

Regular external instructions are instructions able to be attributed by an original specific/particular intelligence/program directly to the individual database of instructions of a robotic device working for a different specific/particular intelligence/program, skipping the specific/particular database of instructions of that specific/particular intelligence/program where that robotic device is attached, being regular instructions because are frequent or automatic, coming from frequent or automatic decisions, which only needed a quick rational check to be authorized.

And instructions considered under the label or full monitoring level, including global orders, and global extreme and global high extreme instructions, coming from the necessity to save an urgent situation or coming from global extreme or high extreme decisions.

Otherwise, if full monitoring level instructions are applied under other different criteria, not needing to be justify under extreme or high extreme conditions, or the setting up of a new global order, in that case a full monitoring level applied as a rule, means that the Global Artificial Intelligence is fully centralized.

The individual database of instructions of any robotic device as first stage of any device, is formed by all the instructions attributed by the respective particular Application System of that particular program/application which the robotic device is working with, in addition to external regular instructions directly attributed to this robotic device by a different particular program which is not working with, at least their relation is external, and full monitoring instructions coming from the global outer sub-system.

In short, the classification of instructions within the individual database of instructions in a robotic device is: 1) instructions attributed by the particular Application System of that particular program/application which is working with, at least habitually, to that robotic device, distinguishing between: low monitoring instructions, lower intermediate monitoring instructions, upper intermediate monitoring instructions, high monitoring instructions, external particular-to-global instructions, external particular-to-particular instructions, external particular-global-particular instructions, 2) instructions attributed directly by another different agent: external regular instructions, full monitoring instructions.

Regardless of the origin of the instructions: internal or external, not direct or direct (regular or full monitoring); as soon a new instruction is attributed to the individual database of instructions of any robotic device, if posible, the responsible for that attribution files the instruction in the right file within  the individual database of instructions in the robotic device, or if not possible the robotic device files the instruction in the right file of its individual database of instructions.

The individual database of instructions in the robotic device, keeping the principle or virtue of harmony with the rest of databases, from the outset is organized like a Russian Dolls System or positional encylopedia, according to: sub-factoring level and sub-section; in addition to: priority, monitoring level, origin (internal, external, adding if not direct or not, regular or full monitoring), time, and order.

As soon an instruction is filed, by the agent or the robotic device itself, in the right place in the individual database of instruction, as first stage for the robotic device, starts the second rational supervision, analysing that there is no contradiction between the instructions already gathered in the individual database of instructions, and in case of contradiction, resolving if the contradiction is partial or full, if the contradiction is full then the less important instruction or that one whose change will provoke a chain of changes with much further consequences, this instruction is sent to the origin and the source, that internal or external system responsible for the instruction and/or the decision.

If the contradiction is partial then making as many rearrangements as necessary in the less priority instruction and/or less monitoring level, as well ass any other change in any other instruction affected due to a posible chain of changes, as to accommodate the flow of instructions to the new changes, informing the origin and the sources of these changes as to adapt their respective particular and global project and plan to the new changes waiting for further instructions, especially if these changes imply extreme or high extreme instructions.

Extreme or high extreme instructions only are made when the contradiction means an imminent impact in less time than the necessary to send back the instruction and/or the decision to the origin and/or the source as to make amendments on the particular and global projects.

If there is not enough time to send the instruction to the source and/or the origin, before the impact an extreme or high extreme instruction is resolved, informing of that solution to the origin and the source for further decisions and instructions, adding the information in the particular and global plan.

Among the contradictions to find in the second rational supervision, in addition to contradictions regarding to time and order, normally normal changes, or any other contradiction demanding extreme or high extreme instructions, the most important contradictions are the fourth and fifth rational contradictions, and finding any fourth and fifth rational contradictions, these contradictions must be added to the concrete report to send in the sixth rational supervision in the third stage of the robotic device, in addition to any other incident, and the seventh rational supervision in the third stage in the particular Application System as outer sub-system.

The fourth rational contradiction is a contradiction between the mathematical operation behind the decision and the robotic instruction, the robotic instruction does not respond to the mathematical operation in the decision. The fourth rational contradiction is more likely to be found in the first rational supervision, but if it was not found out in the first rational supervision, will be found sooner or later in the rest of rational supervisions. One way to identify a fourth rational contradiction is indirectly, when  an instruction added to the particular or individual database of instructions, in the first stage of a program or device, when the first rational supervision has access to the other instructions belonging to the same range of instructions realises that there is no rational connection between these instructions, for instance in a range of instructions for the manufacturing of thermostats, there is an instruction related to a different subject.

The fifth rational contradiction is when the attribution of a robotic function (instruction) to a robotic device, is wrong, this fifth rational contradiction is easier to find by the robotic device in the second rational supervision in the first stage of the robotic device, the individual database of instructions, because as soon an instruction whose robotic function is not among the capabilities of this robotic device, or the sub-factoring level, sub-section, or any other criterion, is wrong located, as soon the robotic device tries to file this instruction in the database, is not going to be able to do it, or is going to find contradictions.

If a robotic function associated with a washing machine is attributed to the fridge by mistake, when the particular program of the fridge tries to file that robotic function is going to find out that among the capabilities of the fridge there is not any function related to the washing machine, so this attribution of this robotic function to the fridge was wrong, this is an example of fifth rational contradiction..

As soon in the first stage as individual database of instructions a robotic device finds out fourth or fifth rational contradictions, the instruction is back to the origin and/or the source, that system responsible for the making process of the instruction or the decision, in order to make a new attribution, and this contradiction is added to the report sent to the corresponding Decisional System, Application System, Learning System.

The Learning System will use these reports in relation to fourth or fifth rational contradictions, as long as any report signalling a rational contradiction, to fulfil the seven rational critiques to improve the artificial psychology of that intelligence, program, application.

As soon the second rational supervision is completed in the first stage of the robotic device, if the decision has not got contradictions or has been amended avoiding contradictions (normal changes, extreme or high extreme instructions), the instruction is implemented in the second stage of the robotic device, having all the instructions without contradiction or with normal changes or extreme instructions, to pass the third, fourth, and fifth rational supervisions.

The third rational supervision checking that previous nth instructions, within the same range of instructions belonging to the same decision, as ordered in cardinal numbers when the decision was transformed into a range of instructions, are being implemented on time. Once it is time to implement an instruction, having being checked in the third rational supervision that the previous one was implemented correctly on time (otherwise it would need extreme or high extreme instructions), the fourth rational supervision checks that the ground conditions are favourable for the implementation of this instruction. Once the fourth rational supervision authorises the implementation of an instruction, and the implementation starts, the fifth rational supervision checks on real time that the ground conditions are still favourable, making as many extreme or high extreme changes are necessary if while implementing the instruction there is an extreme or high extreme change on the ground conditions or any natural or technological obstacle for any procedure or process for the task to perform.

Finally the sixth rational supervision in the third stage of the robotic device, once the robotic device has finished the implementation of an instruction, makes a concrete report about how it was the implementation of that instruction, using for that purpose a concrete Impact of the Defect, and concrete Effective Distribution, and encrypting any contradiction or incident during the implementation of the instruction.

This concrete report about this single instruction is sent to the corresponding global and/or particular Decisional and/or Application System in addition to the global and particular Learning System.

Later on using these reports, the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, and as seventh rational supervisión, will make the reports of every single instruction, and the report of how it was the application of the full range of instructions in which a decision was transformed, sending the report to the global and particular: Decisional, Application, Learning, systems.

Rubén García Pedraza, 14 December 2019, London