domingo,
10 de junio de 2018
THE
THIRD STAGE IN THE MODELLING SYSTEM AS FIRST STEP IN THE THIRD STAGE
IN SPECIFIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES FOR ARTIFICIAL RESEARCH BY
DEDUCTION WITHIN THE FIRST PHASE
The
responsible for the increment of efficacy, efficiency, and
protection of the Global Artificial Intelligence, is the Learning
System, applying the the Defect and the Effective Distribution across
all the Artificial Intelligence, specific or global depending on what
level is working on.
The
main difference between Modelling System and Learning System is the
fact that the Modelling System makes decisions to protect and better
only mathematical
models, while the Learning System makes decisions to protect
and better all the systems, programs, applications, across the
Artificial Intelligence, specific or global.
The
way in which the Impact of the Defect is going to make
decisions is as follows:
-
There are at least two
strategies,
1) first option the creation of Specialised
Impacts of the Defects
in every specific, particular, global, model (descriptive,
prediction, evolutionary), for every synthetic science, discipline,
activity,
making therefore an Specialised Impact of the Defect for every
model in every level for every subject, 2) the creation of a Unified
Impact of the Defect to apply in any mathematical (descriptive,
prediction, evolutionary) model at any level (global, specific,
particular),
in any subject.
It would be advisable that at the beginning in
the first phase the Specialised Impacts of Defects,
as first attempts using this technology, could
be a good option,
and by the time this technology has been well tested, and is about to
start the third
phase
of standardization,
parallel the standardization process goes on from the first period of
coexistence to the second period of consolidation, along this process
the Specialised Impacts of the Defects can have another similar
process through the unification of all of them in only one Unified
Impact of the Defect, valid for: any level, any subject, any
mathematical model.
-
Once it has been chosen the strategy, the identification of
errors, defects or mistakes in the field where is later
applied. If Specialised Impact of the Defect (especially in the first
phase) in every level, subject, and mathematical model, summarizing
all possible error, defect or mistake for every model, subject and
level. In case of Unified Impact of the Defect, summarizing all
possible error, defect or mistake at any level in any subject in only
one list, especially in the third phase by the union of all possible
list of errors, defects, mistakes, from all Specialised Impact of the
Defect, in only one, the Unified Impact of the Defect.
-
Regardless of what strategy has been chosen (Specialised or Unified
Impact of the Defect), once all possible error, defect, mistakes, is
summarized in a Specialised or Unified list of categories of errors,
defects, or mistakes, then all the errors, defects, mistakes
are ordered in categories or levels in an ascending sense of gravity,
a hierarchical of gravity from the least to the most severe, in a
model of ascending gravity sorting in the form of ranking.
-
The total number of categories ordered by ranking,
the sample of categories of the ranking, will be symbolized with the
symbol "Nº", the sample of types of
defects, and the nth position of the ranking
that occupies each category in the ranking will be symbolized "nº"
, being in this particular case each particular position of the
ranking a type, category or level, of particular defect on the
process or system. So if the order of defects in the ranking has been
done correctly in ascending direction from the least serious to the
most severe, the weighted factor of each individual defect will be
equal to dividing its particular nth position in the ranking, "nº",
between the total number of categories in the ranking, "N º",
so the weighted gravity is equal to "n º/N º".
Weighted
gravity = nº: N º
-
The frequency or
direct punctuation of every category of
error, defect, or mistake, is the symbol “xi”.
-
So the Impact of the Defect for every category of error, defect, or
mistake is
Impact
of the Defect = [xi · (n º: N º)] : Σxi
-
Once it has been calculated the Impact of the Defect for any category
of error, defect, mistake, every Impact of the Defect of every
category of error, defect, mistake, can be criticised,
following the rational criticism set out in the in paragraph 21 of
“Introducción a la Probabilidad Imposible, estadística de la
probabilidad o probabilidad estadística”.
After
criticising the categories of error, defect, upon the
results, the protective decisions to make, must
be all those decisions in order to prevent further consequences from
all those categories whose Impact of the Defect are equal or above
the critical reason.
Along
with the collaboration
in second
and fifth
phase
between
by Application and by Deduction,
pointed
out in previous post, another
reason
for the collaboration between by Application and by Deduction is how
useful conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models; made by deep
artificial comprehension could
be valid for
the elaboration of lists of categories of errors, defects, mistakes,
in Specialised and/or Unified Impact of the Defects,
being this reason another important key factor in the integration
process when analysing the Modelling System in the sixth
phase is important to realise what transformations there are
regarding to the decision making process.
Alike
the Impact of the Defect, distinguishing Specialised and
Unified Impact of the Defect, regarding to the Effective
Distribution happens something similar,
having two strategies as well, firstly the creation of Specialised
Effective Distributions according to: level, subject,
mathematical model; pointing out for each one lists of categories
related to efficacy, efficiency, productivity, to include especially
in the first phase. And the Unified Effective Distribution
unifying in only one list of categories related to: efficiency,
efficacy, productivity; all possible category at any level, subject,
model, especially in the third phase of standardization and sixth
phase of integration.
And
for the design of what categories related to efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, must be included in the Specialised or Unified
Effective Distribution, the relations of collaboration in second and
fifth phase between by Application and by Deduction could be helpful
in order to use the current conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models;
made by deep artificial comprehension in Artificial Research by
Deduction in phases one and third, in order to supply valuable
information regarding to what categories of efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, to add in such lists of categories in Specialised or
Unified Effective Distributions.
Regardless
of what strategy is used to make Effective Distributions, Specialised
or Unified, the way that either of them works is identical. The
Effective Distribution was explained in the paragraph 22 in
“Introducción a la Probabilidad Imposible, estadística de la
probabilidad o probabilidad estadística”.
The
Effective Distribution, specialised or unified, works as follows:
-
If specialised, the elaboration of a list of categories
related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity, for every
model in every subject at every level. If unified, the elaboration of
a list of categories related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity,
including all possible category from all possible model in all
possible subject in all possible level, including all of them in only
one, a unified list valid for all of them equally.
-
The different categories should be ordered according to
their level of importance for the efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, the ordination is made, from the first to the
umpteenth last position, from minor to greater importance.
The order in the ranking is as then as follows:
the first category is the least important, the last category
the most important for the efficiency, efficacy, the
productivity, ordering everyone in an upward manner.
-
The symbol of every category in the ranking is
the symbol "nº", position umpteenth
in the ranking, in this particular case, nth position in the ranking
from lowest to highest level of ideal of efficiency, efficacy,
productivity. And “Nº” symbolised the total number of
categories in the ranking.
-
At the time that each category has assigned its position in the
ranking, then the weighted effectiveness of each category will be
equal to the quotient of dividing its nth position, "nº",
between the total number of ranking positions, "Nº".
Weighted
effectiveness = nº: N º
-
For each category the direct punctuation or frequency symbolised
with “xi”.
-
Once the weighted effectiveness is calculated, as well as the direct
punctuation or frequency of each category has been measured, then the
Individual effectiveness is equal to: the product of the
effectiveness weighted by the direct punctuation or frequency,
product to be divided between the total of direct punctuations or
frequencies, resulting from this quotient the Individual
effectiveness.
Individual
effectiveness = [xi · (N º: N º)] : Σxi
The
way to make bettering decisions in categories with the lower
Individual effectiveness,
-
Robotic decisions, such as robotic subjective auto-replications,
especially those ones suggesting the construction of new
intelligences, applications, programs, robotic devices by the
Artificial Engineering.
-
Learning decisions made by the Learning System in order to make
artificial psychological subjective auto-replications, especially for
the improvement and enhancement of the inner artificial psychology of
an specific or global Artificial Intelligence, or particular
application or program, or particular application for particular
program.
In
synthesis the decisions gathered in the database of
decisions, as first stage of decision for the Decisional
System could be synthesised as: research decisions
(made in the third stage in the Modelling System), decisions
to control the access to information, robotic decisions
(especially for the construction of new intelligences, programs,
applications, and robotic devices by the Artificial Engineering),
learning decisions (especially affecting the
inner artificial psychology of any intelligence, system, application,
program, robotic device).
sábado,
9 de junio de 2018
THE
SECOND STAGE IN THE MODELLING SYSTEM AS FIRST STEP IN THE THIRD STAGE
IN SPECIFIC ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCES FOR ARTIFICIAL RESEARCH BY
DEDUCTION WITHIN THE FIRST PHASE
The
work made by the Unified Application, the Application System, and the
Learning System, rest on the use of a synthetic (encyclopaedist)
language, evolving to a non-human artificial synthetic
(encyclopaedist) language, while the deductive program, the Modelling
System, and the Decisional System, rest on the use of mathematics as
language and as method. Especially, the deductive program uses
mathematics as pure language (as an exact language opposite to
synthetic language) while the Modelling System and the Decisional
System use mathematics as a pure (analytical) method, doing as many
calculus as possible to represent as exactly as possible the reality
itself as a rational reality and make right decisions.
lunes,
28 de mayo de 2018
domingo,
22 de julio de 2018
THIRD
STAGE OF THE MODELLING SYSTEM IN THE INTEGRATION PROCESS
UNIFIED
IMPACT OF THE DEFECT, UNIFIED EFFECTIVE DISTRIBUTION
The
basic algorithm behind the Impact of the Defect will not change in
the global Modelling System, remaining as it was applied in the
former
specific
Modelling System, as first step in the third stage in the first
phase, but from the standardization
process on, the organization of that list of categories related
to defects in which the calculations of defects must be based on, is
a list of categories that must include a huge number of categories,
and in order to be able to organize such a number of categories, is
important how to manage such a huge number of categories within a
list of categories, to study the impact of any new rational
hypothesis added to the rational truth, therefore to the mathematical
representations of the world.
In
order to organise the list of possible defects is necessary firstly,
from the standardization process on, the unification of all the lists
of categories related to defects coming from all the specific Impact
of the Defects created in the first phase, for the creation of a
Unified Impact of Defect.
The
Unified Impact of the Defect in reality is going to work like a
program itself within the third stage of the Modelling System in the
final Global Artificial Intelligence in the integration process,
because actually the Unified Impact of the Defect
has all the elements to be a program, starting with
the creation of a database of categories of defects
as first stage of this program, as
second stage the calculation of the Impact of Defect for every
category, ending up as a
in
the decision making process to protect the mathematical models.
For
that reason understanding the Unified Impact of the Defect as a
program itself working within the third stage in the Modelling System
in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the first thing to do is to
analyse how to organize such a massive database of categories, in
order that it could be useful for its real purpose, at any time that
something happens in the real world, and lots of rational hypothesis
are added to the rational truth, to facilite the decision making
process , prioritizing all those decisions to save lives and
reduce damages, along with all those decisions upon the Unified
Effective Distribution to better the global model.
The
organization of the database of categories in the unified database of
categories, in order to be congruent with the organization
of the conceptual hemisphere in the matrix, the factual hemisphere
in the matrix, and rational truth, must be organised following a
sub-section system, using the same criteria used in the organisations
of databases and matrices in other systems, programs, applications,
working in the Global Artificial Intelligence, keeping at any
time the virtue or principle of harmony between the database
of defects in the Unified Impact of the Defect and the
organization of databases and matrices in the rest of systems,
programs, applications, working for the Global Artificial
Intelligence, as well as keeping the principle of harmony between the
organization of the first stage of the Unified Impact of the Defect,
the database of categories related to defects, and the first stage of
the Unified Effective Distribution, the database of categories
related to efficacy, efficiency, productivity.
In
the same way that the organization of the rational truth, as
suggested in the post “First
stage in the Modelling System in the integration process”, is
an organization in a sub-section system synthesizing
the geographical criteria and the encyclopaedic criteria,
organising every section in that position as an encyclopaedic
sub-section system, like if it was the natural/social and
technological encyclopaedia of that position, the
first stage of the Unified Impact of Defect as a database of
categories related to all possible defects in the world, is a
database of possible defects in the world that must be organized as
the database of all possible defects in any position in the world,
including
categories related to natural or social phenomena, and technological
phenomena that are going to be useful for subjective
auto-replications made by the Artificial Engineering and the Learning
System. As examples of how important is to keep categories of defects
related to natural or social phenomena for instance, in case of
emergency landing, the impact of this emergency landing on the ground
at all level, in the environment and for every singular person on the
jet, or affected by the emergency landing if its done close to some
habitable space.
For
that reason, in order to have a simultaneous flow of data in the
factual hemisphere, and at the same time, and on real time, a
simultaneous flow of data of the Impact of the Defect of anything
that is happening right now, is absolutely necessary that the inner
organization of the database of categories related to defects as
first stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect, must be identical to
the inner organization of the factual hemisphere in the matrix, as a
synthesis of the geographical criteria and the encyclopaedic
criteria.
In
order to make possible this flow of defects at any time that
something happen in the global model, is then necessary to set up the
Unified Impact of the Defect as follows:
-
The first stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect database of
categories related to defects of any type, natural/social and
technological. having an identical organization like the factual
hemisphere in the matrix, with flow of frequency and/or a flow of
direct punctuations of defects for every category, organizing the
defects for every geographical position following the encyclopaedic
criteria in encyclopaedic sub-sections. Flow of
frequency, what means flow of data
-
The second stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect is, having a
permanent flow of defects organised as an encyclopaedia of defects
per position, the second stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect
will give us a permanent flow of Impacts of Defects for every
encyclopaedic defect in every position. Calculating every Impact of
the Defect using the same algorithm, "Impact of the Defect = [xi
· (n º: N º)] : Σxi", where “xi” is the respective
frequency or direct punctuation, “Σxi” is total frequency or
total of direct punctuations, and “nº: N º” is Weighted
gravity. Flow of impacts, what means flow of
calculations.
-
The third stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect, having a
permanent flow of Impact of the Defect for every encyclopaedic
category in every position, will give a permanent flow of decisions
about what categories should be prioritize in order to reduce the
global damages in the global model in order to save as many lives as
possible. The decision about what categories should be prioritized
must be taken on rational basis: all Impact of Defect equal to or
greater than a critical
reason should be considered as category to prioritize any action
to reduce damages and save lives. Flow
of decisions.
The
flow of frequency and/or direct punctuations of defects in the first
stage of the Unified Impact of the Defect, the flow of Impacts of the
Defects in the second stage of the Unified Impact of the Defect, and
the flow of decisions about what categories to prioritize according
to the rational criticism in the third stage of the Unified Impact of
the Defect, do not give the instructions to follow to save lives and
reduce damages, the only thing that decide is what categories must be
prioritized.
Later
on, the way in which the actions on any decided category in the real
world are going to be done, depends on how the protocols, processes,
and procedures, for every category, in case of high risk, is set up,
in addition to how the learning decisions and decisions based on
solving mathematical problems work within the third stage in the
Modelling System.
Once
the Impact of the Defect has decided what categories must be
prioritized, the decisions about how to do regarding to these
categories to save lives and reduce damages, are decisions which
depend on all those procedures, protocols, process, previously set up
in case of damages in those categories, along with all possible
learning decision or decision solving mathematical problems.
Protocols,
processes and procedures, learning decisions and solving mathematical
problems, which must be experimented from the outset, the first
phase, when the first Modelling Systems are created for first time in
the first Specific
Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction,
and upon their successful application, the application of these
successful results in following phases, periods, and moments.
In
the same way that the Unified Impact of the Defect can be define as a
program whose first stage of application is a database of categories
related to defects organised like the encyclopaedic distribution of
categories related to defects per position, synthesizing the
geographical and encyclopaedic criteria as suggested for the factual
hemisphere in the post “First
stage of the Modelling System in the integration process”, in
the same way the Unified Effective Distribution can be defined as a
program whose first stage is the database of categories related to
efficiency, efficacy, productivity, organised like an encyclopaedia
of categories of efficiency, efficacy, productivity per position,
given a permanent flow of data of ratios of efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, in any process in any position.
If
on real time the global Modelling System has a reading about the
efficiency, efficacy, productivity, levels, in any process, in any
position, in the global model, at any time that there is a loss
of efficiency, efficacy, productivity, in any process in any
position, is possible to make decisions about what categories whose
level of efficiency, efficacy, productivity are below the critical
reason, must be prioritized in order to boost their efficiency,
efficacy, productivity.
The
procedures, processes, protocols, to boost the efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, in any process in any position must include processes,
protocols, procedures to boost the efficiency, efficacy, productivity
in any process in any position using for that purpose artificial
learning, and decisions based on solving mathematical problems.
DATABASE
he
inner organization of the database of categories related to defects
as first stage in the Unified Impact of the Defect, must be identical
to the inner organization of the factual hemisphere in the matrix, as
a synthesis of the geographical criteria and the encyclopaedic
criteria.
HARMONY
THIRD STAGE APPLICATION SYSTEM, THE ASSESSMENT
The Impact of de Defect and Effective Distribution used by applications and robotic devices is not the same as the one used by the the global Application System, while every application and robotic device has its own particular Application System, so the assessment is made when doing the report by the particular Application System, so the report sent by the application or robotic device is made using its particular model of Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution, but having in common the same error codes or categories of efficiency like the global Particular System, once the report arrives at the global Particular System is analyzed by, two options: or 1) the same Unified Impact of the Defect and Unified Effective Distribution used by the global Modelling System (keeping the prínciple of Harmony, more advisable) or 2) a global Impact of the Defect and global Effective Distribution as a collection of the categories from all the particular Impact of the Defects and all the particular Effective Distributions, or 3) the best one as synthesis of the other ones, the global unified Impact of the Defect as synthesis of the Unified Impact of the Defect and all the categories used by all the particular Impact of the Defects, synthesizing all the lists from all the particular Impacts of the Defects and the Unified Impact of the Defect in only one, the Global Unified Impact of the Defect, the same for the Global Unified Effective Distribution, using for that purpose the Russian dolls system as a method for the organization of the global unified list of categories of impacts or effectiveness
What I would do is to respect the principle or Harmony to facilitate later on the seventh phase, so in the analysis of the reports sent by particular applications and robotic devices in the global Application System, the analysis will be done using the same Unified Impact of the Defect and Unified Effective Distribution as the global Modelling System,
UNIFIED
IMPACT OF THE DEFECT, UNIFIED EFFECTIVE DISTRIBUTION
The
basic algorithm behind the Impact of the Defect will not change in
the global Modelling System, remaining as it was applied in the
former
specific
Modelling System,
as first step in the third stage in the first
phase,
but from the standardization
process
on, the organization of that list of categories related to defects in
which the calculations of defects must be based on, is a list of
categories that must include a huge number of categories, and in
order to be able to organize such a number of categories, is
important how to manage such a huge number of categories within a
list of categories, to study the impact of any new rational
hypothesis added to the rational truth, therefore to the mathematical
representations of the world.
In
order to organise the list of possible defects is necessary firstly,
from the standardization process on, the unification
of all the lists of categories related to defects coming
from all the specific Impact of the Defects created
in the first phase, for the creation of a Unified Impact of Defect.
The
Unified Impact of the Defect in reality is going to work like a
program itself within the third stage of the Modelling System in the
final Global Artificial Intelligence in the integration process,
because actually the Unified Impact of the Defect has all the
elements to be a program, starting with the creation of a database of
categories of defects as first stage of this program, as second stage
the calculation of the Impact of Defect for every category, ending up
as a third stage with the decision about what defects must be
prioritized in the decision making process to protect the
mathematical models.
For
that reason understanding the Unified Impact of the Defect as a
program itself working within the third stage in the Modelling System
in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the first thing to do is to
analyse how to organize such a massive database of categories, in
order that it could be useful for its real purpose, at any time that
something happens in the real world, and lots of rational hypothesis
are added to the rational truth, to facilite the decision making
process , prioritizing all those decisions to save lives and reduce
damages, along with all those decisions upon the Unified Effective
Distribution to better the global model.
The
organization of the database of categories in the unified database of
categories, in order to be congruent with the organization of the
conceptual hemisphere in the matrix, the factual hemisphere in the
matrix, and rational truth, must be organised following a sub-section
system, using the same criteria used in the organisations of
databases and matrices in other systems, programs, applications,
working in the Global Artificial Intelligence, keeping at any time
the virtue or principle of harmony between the database of defects in
the Unified Impact of the Defect and the organization of
databases and matrices in the rest of systems, programs,
applications, working for the Global Artificial Intelligence, as well
as keeping the principle of harmony between the organization of the
first stage of the Unified Impact of the Defect, the database of
categories related to defects, and the first stage of the Unified
Effective Distribution, the database of categories related to
efficacy, efficiency, productivity.
In
the same way that the organization of the rational truth, as
suggested in the post “First
stage in the Modelling System in the integration process”,
is an organization in a sub-section system RUSSIAN DOLLS SYSTEM synthesizing the
geographical criteria and the encyclopaedic criteria, organising
every section in that position as an encyclopaedic sub-section
system, like if it was the natural/social and technological
encyclopaedia of that position POSITIONAL ECYCLOPEDIA, the first stage of the Unified Impact
of Defect as a database of categories related to all possible defects
in the world, is a database of possible defects in the world that
must be organized as the database of all possible defects in any
position in the world.
EVOLUTION
- First phase, specific Impact of the Defect and specific Effective Distribution for every Specific Artificial Intelligence by Deduction to be used in the specific Modelling System, the applications responsable for the reports, the specific Application System, and the specific Learning System
- Second phase, collaborations between specific Impact of the Defects and specific Effective Distributions by Deduction and list of categories in by Application
- Third
phase, Unified Impact of the Defect ( unifying in a Russian Dolls System all the categories of defects from all Specific Impact of the Defect from all Specific Artificial Intelligence, in only one, the Unified Impact of the Defect) and Unified Effective Distribution, to be used by the Global Artificial Intelligence, to be used in the global Modelling System, the global Application System, the global Learnig System
- Fourth phase, in the Unified Application, the creation of categories related to defects or effectiveness, and a Unified Impact of the Defect and Unified Effective Distribution for the Unified Application
- Fifth phase, particular Impact of the Defect and particular Effective Distribution
-
Sixth phase, Global Unified Impact of the Defect (synthesizing the list of categories in the Unified Impact of the Defect and the list of categories from all particular Impact of the Defect, using a Russian Dolls System) and Global Unified Effective Distribution, to be used by the Global Artificial Intelligence, to be used in the global Modelling System, the global Application System, the global Learnig System
For every phase, the specific, unified, particular, global, Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution is organized like a program:
- First satege, database, application or comprehension stage, list of (speicifc, unified, particular, global) categories as a Russian Dolls System
- Second Phase, replication or explanation stage, the calculation of the Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution
- Third phase, auto-replication, according to the results, the decisión making process chosing what error or lack of efficiency deserves more priority to make a decisión.
The decision could be any kind of decision, from high extreme to normal, or global, and in game theory must be based on creativity, so much more tan high empirical probability, is more important high efficiency, even when the empirical probability is not so high or zero: surprise.
