The
first stage, as the application stage, of the Modelling System (to make models at the second stage and decisions at the third stage) at a particular level is the database
of rational hypotheses, the rational truth, to store particular hypotheses of
particular things or beings.
At a particular level is possible the creation of particular deduction programs
(particular programs) for particular things or beings, to be later united to
particular applications, to make particular applications for particular programs (fifth phase), working as many particular deductions programs or
particular applications for particular deductions programs as many particular
things or beings have this technology.
The
particular applications for particular programs would be an utter development
of the original particular programs, in turn, particular programs are a further development of the original Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, created in the first phase, whose evolution as of the third
stage would be their transformation into specific deductive programs (tracking
the global matrix to make specific deductions for a specific synthetic science,
discipline or activity, or tracking in the global matrix the specific flow of
packages of information of a specific sub-factor), or particular programs
(tracking the particular matrix of a particular thing or being created adding
factors, from the global matrix to the particular matrix, related to this
particular thing or being).
The
rational hypothesis for a particular thing or being made by every particular
program and particular application for a particular program, is stored in the
database of rational hypotheses of this particular program or particular
application for a particular program, and this database of rational hypotheses is
the application as a first stage of the Modelling System as the first step in the
third stage of decision in the particular program or particular application for
a particular program.
Particular
programs or particular applications for particular programs, due to originally
were Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction,
their organization is the same that the organization of any Artificial Intelligence in three stages: application (database or matrix), replication (of
human skills), auto-replication (auto- improvement/enhancement, and decision).
The auto-replication stage as the decision stage in particular programs and particular
applications for particular programs has the same organization as any other
Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction,
organizing the third stage of auto-replication in four steps: firstly, Modelling System
(upon rational hypothesis, to make firstly models and later decisions), secondly DecisionalSystem (upon a database of decisions, to make a mathematical project
and later choose what decisions are accepted), thirdly Application System (upon the
decisions accepted, to put them into practice, and asses their impact), and finally Learning System (upon the impacts, the detection of failures proposing
improvements and enhancements).
The
reason why a particular program or a particular application for a particular
program, as any other specific program, they are not reality intelligences by themselves, is because of the consideration of what is an Artificial
Intelligence for itself is important that this Artificial Intelligence has its own
database or its own matrix completely independent, not depending on any other
database or matrix.
When
an intelligence depends on another database or matrix, this is not really an
intelligence itself, because if the owner of the original database or matrix
cancels its access to the database or the matrix, it would not be able to make a hypothesis any more, until the revocation of this prohibition.
If
the particular matrix of a particular program or particular application of a
particular program depends on the authorisation to have access to the global
matrix, if for any reason this authorisation is revoked, this particular
program or particular application for a particular program could not be able to
make rational hypotheses or decisions. It is not true intelligence. It is a
program which depends on access to the original source of information, the
global matrix.
For
that reason, Specific Artificial Intelligences based on artificial learning could be a real risk in the years to come, if by chance they are out of control, because they
have developed their own databases or matrices.
Specific
Artificial Intelligences based on artificial learning have more autonomy than a
program, and can pose a real risk if they are out of control; for that
reason is really important the creation of the
Global Artificial Intelligence.
The Global Artificial Intelligence can coordinate programs and specific intelligences, and it must be able to make
particular deductions using global and specific deductive programs in the second
stage, so any possible relation of any possible factor affecting any possible
particular thing or being, but not included yet in the particular matrix, could
be identified, making deductions, to make decisions to be sent to the
Decisional System in the Global Artificial Intelligence.
For
that reason, even having particular things or beings, particular programs, it is
necessary that the Global Artificial
Intelligence can make decisions at all levels, including the particular
level.
Later, all the rational hypotheses made in the second stage of the Global Artificial
Intelligence, as well as all the rational hypotheses made in the second stage
of a particular program, are sent to the database of rational hypotheses in the Modelling System of the Global Artificial Intelligence. Likewise, as the
particular program has its own Modelling System, at least all the rational
hypotheses made by the particular program are sent to the database of rational
hypotheses in the Modelling System in the particular program.
The
Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence is going to create the
global model, as well as virtual and actual, prediction and evolution, models,
including all possible global, specific, particular, rational hypotheses,
including particular rational hypotheses made by the Global Artificial
Intelligence itself and particular programs.
The
Modelling System in a particular program creates a particular model, as well
as virtual and actual, prediction and evolution, models related to its
particular thing or being.
Finally,
all possible decisions related to a particular thing or being made by the Global Artificial Intelligence and particular
programs are sent to the Decisional System in the Global Artificial
Intelligence and the Decisional System in the Decisional System in the
particular program, being aware that if there is a contradiction between global
and particular levels, is necessary furthers analysis to identify the source of
error.
In
case of a contradiction between a global decision and a particular decision,
there are at least two reasons behind this contradiction:
- Because
at a particular level, the particular matrix has not included a relevant factor
for this decision, but a factor that was already included in the global matrix,
and relevant for the global decision.
-
Because there are immediate changes in the particular conditions of a
particular thing or being that are firstly identified much faster at a particular
level, and later at a global level, more than enough time difference to make
wrong a possible decision made at the global level, being much more accurate the
decision at a particular level.
If
a jet is crossing a very dangerous storm full of thunder from the first
second, the storm is going to be registered in the particular matrix of that
jet, while this storm in the global matrix could be registered after several
seconds. These several seconds can make a big difference. In less than a few
seconds, thunder could hit the jet. It is pretty sure that under such conditions, the global matrix could also make really good decisions, having registered these very bad weather conditions, but very late.
In
the experimentation process of the Decisional System, one solution for those
decisions running out of time is the creation of some automatic check provided
by the Decisional System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, authorising any
particular decision in question in very few seconds after having successfully
passed this automatic check.
A
previous automatic risk assessment, if noting a high-risk situation, could allow
the authorisation of some decisions only after passing some checks based on the
mathematical project in the Decisional System.
The
main advantage of global and specific deductive programs tracking the global
matrix in order to make particular decisions, is the fact that in the global
matrix are already included all possible factors able to affect any particular
thing or being, so the possible particular decisions at global level made by
global/specific programs are going to be more comprehensive in terms of a number of factors to include in the particular decision.
But
the main advantage of a particular program, especially particular programs
working for particular applications already within the particular thing or
being, for example, a particular application already working in a jet, or in a
control tower in an airport, is the possibility to realise much faster any
possible change in the particular thing or being, changes able to cause
alterations in the conditions to make decisions.
It
is probably that if a jet runs out of fuel after having been closed the
airport where it was supposed to land, the decision about what other airport
could be available, is a decision to check even several times, due to the high
risk of an accident if choosing a new route for the new airport the jet could
crash with another jet, or the possibility that taking another new route for a
new airport, the jet could have problems due to bad weather, or the new airport
would not have runways available by the time the jet arrived.
In
this situation, to have as many checks as possible is important. In fact, this
mathematical project is done automatically by Artificial Intelligence. In addition to the rational checks that all
the mathematical models, at a global and particular level, are going to have,
this project is going to be permanently tracked by the mathematical project in
the Decisional System, at global level, by the Decisional System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, and at particular level by the Decisional System in
the particular program of this particular jet, as well as the Decisional System
of that particular program of the new airport set up in the control tower to
control the landing.
This
is a permanent work of surveillance made by the Global Artificial Intelligence
itself and all the particular programs involved in this decision, and at any
time that a contradiction is found between the decisions made at the global level
by global/specific deductive programs and particular level by particular
programs, the contradiction must be analysed to find out the source of error as
soon as possible.
Like
the particular programs are going to have their own Decisional System,
particular programs need to have their own Application System, and their
own Learning System, and in case of contradiction between global and particular
levels, the development of further analysis is needed to find out the source of error.
Once
I have explained the relations between global and particular levels in the
decision-making process, is time to develop the database of rational hypotheses
as a first stage of application in the Modelling System in a particular program.
For
particular program could be understood as either 1) a simply particular deductive
program, as an evolution of a Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial
Research by Deduction, or 2) the particular deductive program, as an evolution of a
Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction working
for a particular application, as an evolution of a Specific Artificial
Intelligence for Artificial Research by Application, what it would be a
particular application for a particular program.
The
main difference between a particular program as a simply particular deductive
program and a particular program as a particular program working for a
particular application (particular application for a particular program) is the
fact that particular applications for particular programs have the particular
matrix structured as a human brain in two hemispheres, one hemisphere of the
matrix is a conceptual hemisphere (made of synthetic categories) and the other
hemisphere is the factual hemisphere (made of factors).
While
the particular matrix of a particular program as a simply particular deductive
program, not united to the corresponding particular application, it is a
particular matrix based on factors only. In
order to make deductions, and decisions based on these deductions, to have
already structured the matrix as a human brain with two hemispheres (conceptual
and factual), or only as a particular matrix of factors without concepts, is
not relevant, because regardless of if the conceptual hemisphere is there or
not, deductions are always based on factors, not concepts.
The
way in which at a particular level, any particular program is going to make
deductions is always the same, and the way in which decisions are based on
deductions is always the same, as was explained in the last post, “The Modelling System at particular level”, and as it was explained in the post “The artificial method for the scientific explanation”. In order to make decisions,
the level at which the decisions are made is not relevant. At all levels, the
method to make deductions is the same.
The
difference is the possibility for particular applications for particular
programs to have a more direct relation with the particular thing or being because the
application is already working within and on the particular thing or being. The relation between the particular thing or being and the particular application
for a particular program is closer and more intimate than the relation between
a particular program and that particular thing or being.
This very intimate relation between the
particular thing or being and the particular program is very clear in the case
of cyborg psychology.
A
particular application for human beings is going to be able to store
information on biostatistics, thoughts, emotions, and perceptions, at any
time, storing all this information in databases.
The
proposal of Impossible Probability for the storing of all this information is
the creation of particular programs for particular applications for human
beings, personal particular programs, as a replica of the human brain, storing in the conceptual hemisphere of
the particular matrix all kinds of synthetic categories related to this particular
human being, and storing in the factual hemisphere of this particular human
being any information regarding any factor within the human being.
The
particular application for a particular program for a particular human being stores information about: biostatistics, network etc..
Based
on the concepts already gathered in the conceptual hemisphere of the particular
matrix, as a replica of the brain of that particular human being, the
particular program for this particular application for this particular human
being, could be able to make conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models;
At
the same time, the particular deduction program tracking the factual
hemisphere could make deductions, and all these rational
hypotheses are stored in the particular
database of rational hypotheses of this particular program.
A
cyborg is not necessarily someone with robotic implants. Right now, for most of
us, our applications on our laptops, computers, mobile phones, tablets, and any
other device are, in reality, extensions of our minds and bodies; we are already cyborgs.
The
memory in our devices is, in reality, an extension of our memory, where we can
store documents, conversations by mail or by video-conference or record our
calls, photographs, movies, and memories.
Right now, thinking of the possibility of merging our current devices with more sophisticated mechanisms of cyborg psychology sounds difficult to believe, but as long as these technologies evolve, this possibility could be a reality soon.
In
all this process, the Modelling System at a particular level plays a key role. Particular programs can suggest decisions at a particular level, or suggest decisions based on deductions made by global/specific programs at a global level.
In
case of contradictions between particular decisions by particular programs and
particular decisions based on deductions by global/specific programs, is
necessary to carry out further analysis, because the source of error could be:
1) the particular matrix has not included from the global matrix a really
important factor so as to make accurate decisions based on very accurate
deductions, 2) there are changes in that particular thing or being not registered
yet in the global matrix but immediately registered in the particular matrix,
making the particular program particular decisions based on deductions having
realised these changes immediately.
As many
particular programs are involved in any particular decision, for instance, in
the example given in the last post, the airports of Santiago de Chile, Miami,
and Panama City are closed, and all flights to these cities must be diverted,
the possible particular programs involved are the particular program of each
airport, including the particular programs of any new airport to divert any
flight, and the particular program tracking every flight. In this example, there
are lots of decisions, not only about new airports, but what routes should be taken.
If
in any decision is found any contradiction between the decisions made between
two or more particular programs, or between one or more particular programs and
a possible decision suggested by the Global Artificial Intelligence, at any
time that a contradiction is found, there must be further analysis to check the
source of error in order to make the most rational decision.
The
decisions to make at a particular level can be classified at least as: research
decisions, learning decisions, and solving mathematical problems decisions. All
possible decisions are going to be sent to the database of decisions to be checked
by the Decisional System.
Especially
in research decisions, these decisions, as based on deductions, are decisions
based on rational hypotheses gathered previously in the database of rational
hypotheses, as the first stage of application for the Modelling System.
Regardless
of any other possible decision, and focusing the debate on the database of
rational hypotheses, there are at least two types of databases of rational
hypotheses once the standardization process evolves from the first period of
coexistence to the second period of consolidation: the database of rational
hypotheses in the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, and
the database of rational hypotheses in the Modelling System in particular
programs.
In
turn, particular deductive programs in the second period of formation in the
fifth phase, as well as particular applications for particular programs in the
third period of consolidation in the fifth phase, can both have a Modelling
System.
What
is really important to note is the fact that during this evolution, the
specific level is absorbed completely or nearly completely by the global level.
By the time the experimentation reaches the sixth phase, the integration process, practically, there are only two real levels, global and particular, in
order to make global and particular deductions and decisions. The specific
level sooner or later is banished, and it is probable that by the time the sixth
phase is completed, when the seventh phase starts, in one way or another, the
particular level is absorbed as well. In the end, it is possible there is only
one level, the reason itself.
In
this suggested evolution, while the standardization and the integration process
progress, the development of particular applications makes sense, and within
the particular applications as the first step in their third stage of decision, the
development of the Modelling System, whose first stage is the database of
rational hypothesis, at particular level gathering all the particular rational
hypothesis made by this particular program concerning this particular thing or
being.
The
organization and management of the particular database of rational hypotheses
by the Modelling System of this particular program is in the same way in which
the database of rational hypotheses in the Modelling System in the Global
Artificial Intelligence is organised and managed, with the difference that the
organization based on a section system in the Modelling System for a particular
program has only one section associated to this level, the only section is only the particular level, and by this, only one section as many sub-sections
as pure reasons are in the pure reason.
As
it was said in the post “The artificial method for the scientific explanation”,
the pure reason is the list of pure reasons, understanding for pure reasons
every possible mathematical (analytical) relation between factors, and the list
of all possible mathematical (analytical) relation between factors is as a
whole the pure reason itself.
The
organisation of the database of rational hypotheses as a first stage of
application for the Modelling System in a particular program is as follows: it is
organised in one section, having as many sub-sections as pure reasons are
in the pure reason.
However,
absolutely all rational hypotheses made by any particular program must be sent to
the database of rational hypotheses in the Modelling System in the Global
Artificial Intelligence, because the mathematical models in the second stage of
the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence must be the most
accurate mathematical representation of the world.
Although
the particular programs must send all their rational hypothesis to the Global
Artificial Intelligence, the Global Artificial Intelligence does not have to do
the same, although it is a possibility.
Once
the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence receives a
particular rational hypothesis made by a global/specific program, or by a
particular program, or once the Modelling System in the particular program
receives a rational hypothesis made by the particular program, the database of
rational hypothesis as application for the Modelling System, in the Global
Artificial Intelligence or the particular program, checks if there are
contradictions between this rational hypothesis and any other one already included,
if there is any contradiction in that case it must be analysed.
At
regular times, the program (global, specific, particular) responsible for the
particular rational hypothesis must check if the particular rational hypothesis
is still rational, and if not, it must be eliminated or modified.
In
the database of rational hypotheses in the Modelling System in the Global
Artificial Intelligence, global/specific programs must check at regular times
that their rational hypothesis is still rational. And in the database of
rational hypotheses in the Modelling System in the particular program, the
program must check at regular intervals that its rational hypothesis is still
rational.
Likewise,
in case of any change in the pure reason due to changes in any concrete pure
reason as a category associated with some mathematical relation, all those
rational hypotheses associated with this pure reason must be checked as well.
The
application for the Modelling System, as the first stage, should manage as well which
intelligences, programs, and applications have access to the database of
rational hypothesis, and previous authorisation of the Decisional System. Only
allowed to have access to the database of rational hypotheses, all those
intelligences, programs, and applications allowed to do it by the Decisional
System, rejecting access to any other one without authorisation. At any
time that any intelligence, program, or application, not having authorisation yet,
asks for permission to consult the application, the application must ask for
permission to the Decisional System.
Knowledge
is priceless, and the most important treasure, to keep it safe, is one of the
most important duties that the application for the Modelling System has, the
absolute protection of the database of rational hypotheses, at any level,
global and particular.
The
reasons why other intelligences, programs, applications, can ask for permission
to have access to the database of rational hypothesis, was explained in those
posts regarding the relations of collaboration between by Application and by Deduction in phases second and fifth, due to the possibility to transform
rational hypothesis into factors as options in by Deduction to be included in
specific matrices (in addition to the global matrix, but the Global Artificial
Intelligence does not have to ask for permission), and the possibility to transform
rational hypothesis by Application into: categories in specific databases of
categories or the unified database of categories in the Unified Application, factors as options in (global, specific, particular) matrices, links (vectors) between concepts in conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models; in
addition to any other possible relation of collaboration.
In
any case, the application for the Modelling System in particular programs,
like the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, should not
allow to have access to the database to any other intelligence, program, or application without the corresponding authorisation issued by the Decisional System, in order to secure the knowledge.
The
real purpose of particular applications for particular programs is to
experiment at a particular level, what later is the integration process,
integrating the Unified Application and the Artificial Research by Deduction in
the Global Artificial Intelligence, in reality, a global deduction program, in
only one intelligence: the final model of Global Artificial Intelligence;
integrating their respective applications in only one, run by the Unified
Application as main responsible for the application of the Global Artificial
Intelligence.
This
application is the result of the union of only one application the unified database of categories and the global matrix, and this application is the matrix. The
responsible for the management of the matrix is the Unified Application, and
the matrix, as a true replica of the human brain, consists of two hemispheres: the
conceptual hemisphere (categories from the former unified database of
categories), and the factual hemisphere (factors from the former global matrix).
In
order to experiment previously how this integration process at a global level is
in the sixth phase, the integration process, in the fifth phase, is
possible to experiment with the collaboration at a particular level between particular
applications and particular programs creating for the first time particular
applications for particular programs as experiments whose results are going
to be put into practice by the time that
the integration process starts uniting in only one matrix concepts and factors
creating the matrix finally.
The
proposal of Impossible Probability for the creation of the matrix as a replica
of the human brain through two hemispheres is replicating the human brain
structure through one hemisphere focused on linguistics (conceptual hemisphere
based on categories) and another hemisphere focused on mathematics (factual
hemisphere based on factors), and each hemisphere subdivided into two sections,
the first section in each hemisphere regarding social and natural phenomena,
the second section regarding technological phenomena.
This
possible structure of the matrix in two hemispheres, conceptual and factual,
and each hemisphere having at least two sections, natural/social and technological,
is a possible structure of the matrix that could be experimented for the first time
at a particular level in particular applications for particular programs.
In
the last example given in the last post, we have the following situation: the
airports of Santiago de Chile, Panama City, and Miami, are closed, and hundreds or
flights must be diverted to other airports immediately.
In
this situation, the way in which particular applications for particular programs
could be put under experimentation replicating the human brain is through the
structure of every particular matrix of every particular program for every
particular application for every particular thing, replicating the human brain
structure in two hemispheres, and every hemisphere in two sections.
The
particular application for the particular program of the airport of Santiago de
Chile, the particular application for the particular program of the airport of
Panama City, the particular application for the particular program of the
airport of Miami, and the particular application for the particular program of
every single jet flying at this time, all of them can have a particular matrix
with two hemispheres, conceptual and factual, each of them with two sections,
natural/social phenomena and technological.
The
conceptual hemisphere of any airport could have concepts regarding every
single object of matter which can affect the airport, staff, passengers, or
flights, as well as information regarding weather conditions, and in very
tectonic places like Chile, even categories related to the geologic conditions.
The
distribution of all these concepts between these two sections depends on the
matter of each concept. For instance, all the concepts related to weather
belong to natural phenomena (first section), all the concepts related to
passengers and staff belong to social phenomena (first section), and all the
concepts related to machinery, hardware or software belong to technology
(second section). The factual hemisphere of any airport could be distributed as
well into two sections. For instance, the weather conditions or the flow of crews
and passengers belong to the first section, and the flow of data about current
conditions of every runway, energy, fuel, machinery on or off, maintenance,
etc., belongs to the second section. In every jet as well, all the information could
be distributed in both sections in both hemispheres.
In
relation to the deduction process, the deduction process itself does not have
any change, but the possibility that for particular things or beings to have
gathered in the factual hemisphere of the matrix at the same time, information
related to social/natural phenomena and technology, what means that in case
that the jet has to change a route for any other one, having all the
information available, about natural phenomena such as climatic conditions, and
the current situation of every device in the jet, such as the remaining fuel or
electricity, in order to make deductions, and based on these deductions the
possibility to make more accurate decisions, is something that is going to
increase the efficiency in its decisions.
And
if these decisions can have the supervision not only of the particular
Decisional System, but the Decisional System of the Global Artificial
Intelligence, the security guarantees for the staff and the passengers are more
than better.
As
many rational checks, security controls, and authorizations required, are demanded
for any particular program, to put into practice a particular decision, the
more reliable is going to be Artificial Intelligence, and one day, when Artificial Intelligence is well tested and experimented, could make decisions
not needing any more human authorization, only with the approbation of the
Decisional System should be enough.
It
is possible that one day even particular programs for particular applications,
are going to be absorbed by the Global Artificial Intelligence, but the real
importance of these programs, is the possibility of setting up the real foundations
for the creation of a real cyborg psychology available for any human being able
to make the big step to evolve to the next phase in the human evolution, the
evolution from our modern human psychology to the artificial psychology,
setting up the bases for a possible artificial life, even though, we already
know that in this evolution there will be a moment in which is going to be
reached a not returning point and beyond this point, further evolutions are
going to be beyond human understanding.
This represents a significant step into uncharted territories of AI development and integration.
Rubén García Pedraza, 1th of July of 2018, London
Reviewed 25 August 2019, Madrid
Reviewed 25 August 2019, Madrid
Reviewed 19 August 2023, Madrid
Reviewed 10 May 2025, London, Leytostone
imposiblenever@gmail.com