Dado un conjunto N tendente a infinito es inevitable que absolutamente todo suceda, siempre que se disponga de tiempo suficiente o infinito , y he ahí donde está el verdadero problema irresoluble o quid de la cuestión de la existencia ¿quién nos garantiza que dispongamos del tiempo necesario para que ocurra lo que debe o deseamos que suceda?


domingo, 17 de junio de 2018

The first stage of the Modelling System in the standardization process


The first stage of the modelling System in the standardization process, as it was explained in the last post, is the application for the first step in the third stage of the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence during the third phase.

The third phase in the construction of the Global Artificial Intelligence is the standardization process when the first gigantic database is sorted out in factors and all specific matrixes from former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are united in only one: the global matrix, as first application for the first stage for the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence.

The third stage in any Artificial Intelligence is the auto-replication stage, or decision stage, and in the Global Artificial Intelligence is organised through four steps, whose first step is the Modelling System, followed by the Decisional System, Application System, and Learning System.

And the inner organization of the Modelling System itself, is through another three stages as well, whose first stage as application is the database of rational hypothesis.

The database of rational hypothesis in the Modelling System, once the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence is completed, gathers: 1) global rational hypothesis made by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, as a global deductive program, making global rational hypothesis combining globally factors from different synthetic sciences, disciplines, and activities, 2)specific rational hypothesis made by specific deductive programs (originally former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, built in the first phase, and transformed into specific deductive programs once their respective specific matrix were included in the global matrix). Specific rational hypothesis made of factors related to a specific synthetic science, or a specific discipline, or specific activity. 3) Particular rational hypothesis, most of them in the first moment of experimentation in the second period of formation, former Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction too, but instead of evolving to specific particular programs, evolving to particular programs to form later particular applications for particular programs. Particular rational hypothesis are related to particular things or beings.

The second stage in the inner organization of the Modelling System is the modelling of mathematical models based on the rational hypothesis, and the third stage is the making decision process based on the mathematical models.

In this post I will develop how the formation of the database of rational hypothesis as first stage, for the first step in the third stage in the third phase, is made through different periods and moments.

The standardization process is a long process to form the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence through the creation of the very first application as first stage for the Global Artificial Intelligence, application made after, on a first gigantic database, sorting out in factors any previous bare database and the union of all specific matrix in only one, the global matrix.

As long the transformation of the gigantic database goes on, uniting as well all specific matrix, towards only one global matrix, the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are absorbed by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, or transformed into particular programs and later on in particular applications for particular programs.

More specifically, the union of specific matrix within the global matrix in the first stage of the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence, and the transformation of former Specific Artificial Intelligences into specific or particular deductive programs, is a process than happens in at least two different periods, the coexistence and the consolidation period.

The coexistence period in the standardization process, the first period in the third phase, is a period based on the coexistence at the same time of the Global Artificial Intelligence and Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction.

The second period in the third phase, the consolidation period in the standardization process, is that period in which practically all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction have been transformed into specific deductive programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, or particular deductive programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

However in order to pass from the first period of coexistence to the second one of consolidation, is not compulsory the absolute transformation of all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction into specific or particular deductive program.

Actually, many phases will be developed in parallel, and it is quite possible that by the time the third phase starts, there are still Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction or by Application about to be built, or in project. It is quite possible that, while the third phase is just starting, many Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction or Application are still in the earliest moments of the first phase.

In fact, the starting point of the last sixth phase, the integration process for the formation of the final prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence, is supposed to be once: 1) the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence (third phase) has achieved the consolidation period (the completion of the absorption process), and the Unified Application has included all specific database of categories in the unified database, at the same time that 2) in the fifth phase the creation of particular programs for particular applications has achieved the consolidation period as well.

But in reality, for the commencement of the integration process, is not necessary the total completion of the consolidation period in phases three, four, and five.

Some Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by deduction or by Application, will  be neither absorbed nor transformed into particular programs or applications, and some Specific Artificial Intelligences based on artificial learning in many activities will try to remain independent.

Likewise, by the time the sixth phase is about to start, there will be some particular applications and particular programs in project, or about to be united, and others are never going to be united in particular applications for particular programs .

In all phase and period in the chronology for the construction of the Global Artificial Intelligence, the sequence is not strict, is flexible, admitting simultaneous developments of different phases and periods in parallel. Therefore, to move to the next phase or period, is not mandatory the absolute completion of the last one. Just as any phase or period is nearly to be completed, the next phase or period can start.

For that reason, what is really important by the time that the sixth phase is ready, is the fact that in addition to: the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, specific deductive programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the Unified Application, and particular applications for particular programs; all remaining Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction or by Application, particular applications, particular programs, and still independent Specific Artificial Intelligences based on artificial learning. Absolutely all of them, must be, in one way or another, under the absolute control, management, and direction of the Global Artificial Intelligence

The final prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence after the integration process, must have the absolute control of all possible system, application, or program within the Global Artificial Intelligence itself, as well as the absolute control of all possible external Specific Artificial Intelligence (not only for Artificial Research, by Application or by Deduction, but for artificial learning too), program or application, not included yet in the Global Artificial Intelligence, regardless of any other circumstance (phase or period of creation, or the purpose), to keep absolutely under its own control, management, and direction, all phenomena on Earth and beyond, the universe, to protect and better the global model and the reality, enhancing our living standards, and improving and protecting our democracy, freedom and human rights.

The construction of the Global Artificial Intelligence, once the first phase and second phase is nearly to be completed, must evolve to the next phase, the standardization process, in which one of the most challenging process, regarding to the auto-replication process, will be how to evolve from former specific databases of rational hypothesis, specific rational truths, to the first global database of rational hypothesis, the first global prototype of rational truth.

The most important challenge in the evolution from former specific databases of rational hypothesis to the first prototype of global database of rational hypothesis, is the fact that during the first period of coexistence in the standardization process, are going to coexist simultaneously the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence and Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction.

In order to have under control this evolution, in the coexistence period is necessary to identify at least two moments, first moment of experimentation, second moment of generalization.

In the first moment of experimentation in the coexistence period, the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence is a simply experiment, not taking any outcome from the Global Artificial Intelligence but as a result of an experiment to be monitored.

In the first moment of experimentation in the coexistence period, is when the first gigantic database in the standardization process should have been: 1) sorted out in factors to form the first global matrix, 2) adding as many specific matrix as possible coming up from all possible Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction ready to be included in the standardization process.

In the first moment of experimentation is when for first time, once the first global matrix is ready, starts the first global deductions made by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, and the first specific deductions by specific deductive programs, transforming as experiments the first Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction into the first specific deductive programs.

In short, the first moment of experimentation in the first period of coexistence in the standardization process, consists of:

- First experiments sorting out bare databases into factors within the global matrix.

- First experiments adding specific matrixes to the global matrix

- First experiments tracking the global matrix the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence to make global rational hypothesis

- First experiments tracking the global matrix specific deductive programs making specific rational hypothesis

- First experiments regarding to how to manage the database of rational hypothesis as first stage of the Modelling System

- First experiments making mathematical models upon the rational hypothesis, as second stage of the Modelling System

- First experiments making decisions upon the mathematical models, third stage of the Modelling System

- First experiments regarding to how to manage the database of decisions, first stage of the Decisional System

- First experiments making a mathematical project based on the decisions, second stage of the Decisional System

- First experiments choosing what decisions must be transformed into instructions and put into practice , third stage of the Decisional System

- First experiments regarding how to manage the database of instructions, first stage of the Application System

- First experiments putting instructions into practice, second stage of the Application System

- First experiments assessing the result of the instructions through the Impact of the Defect, third stage of the Application System

- First experiments regarding how to manage the database of results, first stage of the Learning System

- First experiments identifying failures and improving the whole Global Artificial Intelligence, second stage of the Learning System

- First experiments making decisions about possible improvements and enhancements in the Global Artificial Intelligence, third stage of the Learning System

During the experimentation period in the coexistence period, while all these processes above mentioned are under experimentation, the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence is only an experiment not ready to work directly on the reality.

Only when the first experiments in the Global Artificial Intelligence start having enough results so as to give the Global Artificial Intelligence more autonomy, under supervision and monitored, the Global Artificial Intelligence starts its first attempts working directly on the reality to be tested.

Once the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence has successfully passed as many tests as necessary working directly on the reality, still under supervision and monitored, the experiment moment in the coexistence period is over, transcending to the next moment of generalization in the coexistence period.

The generalization moment in the coexistence period is that moment in which the way to work finally the Global Artificial Intelligence is standardised, what means the standardization of all process involved in the way to work the Global Artificial Intelligence.

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to sort out any bare database, of any science, discipline, or activity, into factors for the standardized global matrix.

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to add any specific matrix, of any science, discipline, or activity, to the standardized global matrix

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to, the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, track the standardized global matrix in order to make global rational hypothesis

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to, specific deductive programs, track the global matrix making specific rational hypothesis

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures regarding to how to manage the database of rational hypothesis as first stage of the Modelling System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to make mathematical models upon the rational hypothesis, as second stage of the Modelling System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to make decisions upon the mathematical models, third stage of the Modelling System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to how to manage the database of decisions, first stage of the Decisional System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to make a mathematical project based on the decisions, second stage of the Decisional System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to choose what decisions must be transformed into instructions and put into practice , third stage of the Decisional System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures regarding how to manage the database of instructions, first stage of the Application System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to putt instructions into practice, second stage of the Application System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to asses the result of the instructions through the Impact of the Defect, third stage of the Application System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures regarding to how to manage the database of results, first stage of the Learning System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to identify failures and improving the whole Global Artificial Intelligence, second stage of the Learning System

- Upon the results in the previous experimentation, generalization and standardization of process and procedures to make decisions about possible improvements and enhancements in the Global Artificial Intelligence, third stage of the Learning System

Under this distinction between first moment of experimentation and second moment of generalization in the first period of coexistence in the standardization process, the concept of standardization goes over the previous meaning only applied to the standardization of the gigantic database to create the global matrix.

Under distinction of two moments, experimentation and generalization, in the coexistence period, now for standardization is meant the standardization of all process and procedure within the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, in order that, once all process and produced within the Global Artificial Intelligence is standardized (from the first stage to the third stage in the Global Artificial Intelligence), at any time that a new bare database is included in the global database standardizing its factors according to the current standards in the database, or any new specific matrix in included in the global matrix, all the process and procedures onwards are going to be standardized, so are going to be made through the same operations. So at any time that any process and procedure in the Global Artificial Intelligence, from the first to the third stage, is activated, the way in which is going to work is keeping the same structure, organization, logic operations, and mathematical standards, to secure that all process and procedure is made under the same level of efficiency and efficacy, to keep a very high level of productivity across all the Global Artificial Intelligence.

For the database of rational hypothesis, this means that during the experimentation moment in the coexistence period, the rational hypothesis gathered in the rational truth, are treated as results of an experimented to be tested, but not working directly to the reality yet.

While the experimentation moment in the coexistence period goes on, the Artificial Intelligences by deduction working on the reality are still the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, not the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence waiting for further experiments and results.

This means that during the experimentation moment in the coexistence period the rational hypothesis, and beyond, the decisions to be put into practice, are still the rational hypothesis and decisions made by Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction.

Once the experimentation moment is finished having good results, and upon the results the generalization process starts standardizing all process and procedures in the Global Artificial Intelligence, upon the standardized processes and standardized procedures the Global Artificial Intelligence starts making rational hypothesis and decisions, which as long as demonstrate to be more efficient every time, former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction whose specific database is already included in the global matrix, and upon the global matrix the Global Artificial Intelligence is able to make very efficient rational hypothesis and decisions, are Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction that progressively are going to be transformed into specific deductive programs, or particular deductive programs, within the first prototype of successful and standardized Global  Artificial Intelligence.

As long as more Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are absorbed by the Global Artificial Intelligence as specific deductive programs, or are transformed into particular deductive programs, the Global Artificial Intelligence evolves from the last moment of generalization in the first period of coexistence to the second period of consolidation, once all or nearly all (because some will remain) Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction is absorbed as specific program or transformed into a particular program.

Now more focused on the database of rational hypothesis in both moments in the first period, is necessary to point out that in the first moment of experimentation, the decisions to be put into practice, are those ones made by Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, based on specific mathematical models, upon specific rational hypothesis.

During the coexistence period, the first experimental global database of rational hypothesis in the first experimental prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence,  is a experimental global database of rational hypothesis, whose first experimental decisions based on the first experimental mathematical models, are going to be only experiments to be tested.

Only after lots of successful experiments, once the experimental global database of rational hypothesis demonstrates that its rational hypothesis are able to make mathematical models, and decisions, enough rational to be put into practice, the experimental database of rational hypothesis becomes a standardized database of rational hypothesis, for the construction of standardized mathematical models, to make further decisions.

As long as the first prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence evolves from an experimental prototype to a standardized prototype, Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction are transformed in specific or particular deductive programs, starting the evolution from the coexistence period to the consolidation period, once all of nearly all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction becomes specific or particular deduction program.

During the evolution from the experimental to the standardized database of rational hypothesis, as long as the database of rational hypothesis evolves from the experimental to the standardized prototype, and once is standardized, the Global Artificial Intelligence evolves to the consolidation period, the number of rational hypothesis grows very fast, including at the end global rational hypothesis, as well as specific and particular rational hypothesis.

Regarding to the database of rational hypothesis, the most important thing to experiment and standardized upon successful results during the experimentation, is how to avoid contradictions among the rational hypothesis.

During the first moment of experimentation in the coexistence period, when the Global Artificial Intelligence is not working directly on the reality yet, the most important thing to observe is: if there is congruence and homogeneity, or at least not contradiction, between the rational hypothesis made by the first experimental prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence, and 1) the reality, or 2) rational hypothesis made by  the current Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction working directly on the reality.

If the current Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, from the outset in the first phase, have demonstrated good results, not having contradiction with the reality, at least not beyond the margin of error in which rational hypothesis were contrasted rationally, if during the coexistence period in the experimentation moment, there are contradictions between rational hypothesis made by the experimental prototype of Global Artificial Intelligence and the current Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, these contradictions should be studied carefully in order to identify the source of error, having two options:

- There are contradictions between rational hypothesis made by the experimental Global Artificial Intelligence and the current Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, because the Global Artificial Intelligence, crossing and mixing factors from different sciences, disciplines, and activities, have a wider perspective making more accurate rational hypothesis as more global information is able to include.

- There are contradictions because the experimental Global Artificial Intelligence is having difficulties making accurate deductions, due to the experimentation in the deduction making process crossing and mixing factors from different sciences, disciplines, activities, is not ready yet to be standardized.

The study of all possible contradiction in the rational hypothesis made by the experimental Global Artificial Intelligence, and the current Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, in the experimentation moment in the coexistence period between the Global Artificial Intelligence and the Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research Deduction, is going to play a key role to decide when the Global Artificial Intelligence is ready to evolve to the next moment of generalization in the coexistence period, and as long as the generalization and standardization of all process and procedure in the Global Artificial Intelligence is finished, the transformation of all or nearly all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction into a specific or particular deductive program, evolving then the  standardization process in the Global Artificial Intelligence to the next period of consolidation: the Global Artificial Intelligence already standardized is finally consolidated.

The contradictions to study in the rational hypothesis in the experimentation moment in the coexistence period then are:

- Contradictions between rational hypothesis by the Global Artificial Intelligence and rational hypothesis by Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction.

- Contradictions between the reality and rational hypothesis by the Global Artificial Intelligence.

- Contradictions between the reality and rational hypothesis by Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction.

- Contradictions between the reality, rational hypothesis by Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, and rational hypothesis by the Global Artificial Intelligence.

The study of these contradictions is very important for the Modelling System for two reasons: 1) the first stage of application in the Modelling System is the database of rational hypothesis,  2) because at any time that during the experimentation period are found out any contradiction, studying the source of error and how to keep it under control through the margin of error, this study allows the Modelling System to avoid further contradictions in any possible mathematical model in the second stage of the Modelling System.

The results in the study of contradictions in rational hypothesis in the experimentation moment, will improve the deduction process, the database of rational hypothesis, the mathematical models, at specific and global level.

And by the time the fifth phase is ready, improvements in particular rational hypothesis based on the study of possible contradictions between: particular rational hypothesis and global rational hypothesis, particular rational hypothesis and specific rational hypothesis, particular rational hypothesis and the reality itself of that particular thing or being.

Once the study of any possible contradiction between: the reality, rational hypothesis by the Global Artificial Intelligence, rational hypothesis by Specific Artificial Intelligences; are under control within the margin of error, then the deduction process to make rational hypothesis by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is ready to be standardized, as well as is ready to be standardized the database of rational hypothesis as first stage of application for the Modelling System.

Once the experimentation moment in the first period of coexistence in the standardization process, finishes when the study of contradictions allows the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence to control the rational hypothesis keeping them within the margin of error, then generalization moment in the first period of coexistence in the standardization process starts generalising and standardizing the results in every process and procedure involved, allowing the transformation of Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction to become specific or particular programs, growing the database of rational hypothesis up to the point to include, in the same database of rational hypothesis as first stage of the Modelling System in the standardized Global Artificial Intelligence: global rational hypothesis, specific rational hypothesis, and particular rational hypothesis.

The standardization process of the database of rational hypothesis, as first stage in the Modelling System, could end up standardizing its organization, through the distribution of the rational hypothesis in the database according to: 1) their level (global, specific, particular), 2) what pure reason was used in their deduction 3) at specific and particular level what program was responsible for their deduction, 4) and at specific and particular level and what matter (science, discipline, activity) is associated with.

In essence, the possible organization of the database of rational hypothesis as first stage of the Modelling System in the first prototype standardized of Global Artificial Intelligence, could be:

- The organization of rational hypothesis according to their level in different sections: the global section for global rational hypothesis, the specific section for all specific rational hypothesis, the particular section for all particular rational hypothesis.

- The global section could be organized in sub-sections according to their pure reason.

- The specific section could be organized in sub-sections according to the specific deductive program, having one sub-section per specific deductive program, and every sub-section in turn divided in sub-sub-section according to the pure reason used by the specific deductive program to make the deduction.

- The particular section could be organized in sub-sections according to the particular deductive program, having one sub-section per particular deductive program, and every sub-section in turn divided in sub-sub-section according to the pure reason used by the particular deductive program to make the deduction.

The main benefits of this organization are:

- Having: the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence as global deductive program its own section of global rational hypothesis, as well as every specific deductive program has its own section of specific rational hypothesis, alike every particular deductive program has its own section of particular rational hypothesis;  in the database of rational hypothesis, the way in which all rational hypothesis made by any program at any level is gathered in the database of rational hypothesis, is sending every program its rational hypothesis to its respective section in the database of rational hypothesis.

- Due to rational knowledge is provisional, rational hypothesis must be checked at regular times to check if they are still true. Having every global, specific, particular, deductive program its respective section, every program must check at regular intervals if all rational hypothesis in its section are still rational.

- If for any reason there is a change in the pure reason, the list of mathematical (analytical or pure) categories of relations between factors, having grouped for every program the rational hypothesis according to the pure reason used in every deduction, would be easier to operate as many changes as necessary.

The reasons why the database of rational hypothesis in the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence can be modified are:

- The inclusion of new rational hypothesis

- The modification of rational hypothesis

- The elimination of rational hypothesis

- The elimination or modification of any other rational hypothesis associated with the rational hypothesis already eliminated before.

Likewise, changes in the database of rational hypothesis, can produce changes in all the intelligences, systems, programs, applications, within, or collaborating with, the Global Artificial Intelligence.

Relations between global matrix and database of rational hypothesis:

- At any time a new rational hypothesis is included at any level, could be added as factor as option in the global matrix

- At any time a rational hypothesis is modified in the database, is modified the corresponding factor as option in the global matrix, being modified too all possible factor as option made of rational hypothesis that could have any relationship with the rational hypothesis already modified before.

- At any time a rational hypothesis is eliminated in the database, is eliminated the corresponding factor as option in the global matrix, being modified or eliminated too all possible factor as option made of rational hypothesis that could have any relationship with the rational hypothesis already eliminated before.

- In the fifth phase, as long as there are changes in the global matrix, to operate as many changes as necessary in those particular matrix affected by these changes.

Relations between Unified Application and database of rational hypothesis:

-At any time a new rational hypothesis is included at any level, could be added as category in the unified database of categories, and as a link of relations between elements in the current conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models.

- At any time a new rational hypothesis is included at any level, if it needs a new scale of measurement suitable to be transformed in discrete categories, the possible addition of the whole system of discrete categories as categories within the unified database of categories.

- At any time a rational hypothesis is modified in the database, is modified the corresponding category in the unified database of categories, being modified too all possible category made of any rational hypothesis that could have any relationship with the rational hypothesis already modified before.

- At any time a rational hypothesis is eliminated in the database, is eliminated the corresponding category in the unified database of categories, being modified or eliminated too all possible category made of any rational hypothesis that could have any relationship with the rational hypothesis already eliminated before.

- At any time a rational hypothesis is eliminated in the database, if affecting a conceptual: scheme, map, set, model; to make as many changes as necessary.

Finally, the Modelling System should be the responsible for the management of the database of rational hypothesis, due to the mathematical models depend on the accuracy of the database of rational hypothesis to make the most isomorphic virtual or actual, descriptive, predictive or evolutionary, models, and based on these models, to make the best decisions to protect and better the global model and the reality.

In fact, one of the tasks of this management should be the permanent supervision of any new rational hypothesis added to the database, in order to study and avoid possible contradictions between rational hypothesis.

At any time a new rational hypothesis is added, should be checked, not only by the program responsible for its deduction, but for the Modelling System too, in order to secure that every new rational hypothesis added to the database has no contradiction with the current rational hypothesis already included.

In addition to this task, the management should imply the supervision of all relations of collaboration between the database of rational hypothesis and other intelligences, programs, or applications, in order to secure that not put at risk the global model, or the reality, having the possibility to submit to the Decisional System any decision regarding to the authorization or rejection of any collaboration between the rational truth and any other intelligence, program, or application.

The database of rational hypothesis is no other thing but the rational truth itself, and as a truth is one of the most precious treasures, and secrets, in Global Artificial Intelligence.

Knowledge is priceless, and one of the most important human qualities to replicate in artificial psychology, to go over the noise, and know the exact source of the external interference.

Rubén García Pedraza, 17th June 2018

sábado, 16 de junio de 2018

The Modelling System in the standardization process


The standardization process is that one in which all specific matrix from all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction, are united in only one, the global matrix, as first stage of application for the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence, global matrix to be tracked by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence at global level (with the assistance of specific deductive programs at specific level, particular deductive programs at particular level), as second stage of replication of the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence, whose result is the formation of rational hypothesis, to be gathered in a database of rational hypothesis as first stage of application for the Modelling System, to make, as second stage of the Modelling System: single virtual models, the global comprehensive virtual model (the global model), in addition to virtual or actual, prediction and evolutionary, models; and based on these mathematical models, the making decision process as third stage of the Modelling System.

The standardization process, according to the chronology given in the post “The unification process of databases at third stage”, corresponds to the third phase of the construction of the Global Artificial Intelligence, whose last phase is the integration process.

In short, the first phase is the construction of Specific Artificial Intelligences, by Deduction and by Application. The second is the collaboration between both. The third is the standardization process through the inclusion of all specific matrix, from all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction, in only one global matrix, as first stage of application for the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence (global matrix tracked at global level by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, at specific level specific deductive programs, particular deductive programs at particular level). The fourth phase is the unification of all specific database of categories of all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Application in only one unified database of categories as first stage of the Unified Application. The fifth is the collaboration between Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence and the Unified Application, and the formation of particular applications for particular programs. Finally the sixth phase, the formation of the final Global Artificial Intelligence through the integration process, the integration of: the Unified Application and the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence (along with specific and particular programs) in only one Global Artificial Intelligence; whose application is the matrix organised, as a human brain, in two hemispheres: the conceptual hemisphere of the matrix from former categories in the Unified Application, and the factual hemisphere of the matrix made of factors (as options and as subjects) from the former global matrix in the former Artificial Research by Deduction in the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence.

This chronology does not mean that every phase must start once the before has been completed, many should be developed in parallel, such as 1) the parallel development of the collaboration between by Application and by Deduction, second phase, as soon as the first phase has created the first models of both intelligences, or 2) the parallel development of the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence (third phase) and the Unified Application (fourth phase), and the collaboration between them (fifth phase).

Additionally, it is very important to realise, that this chronology, does not mean that after the sixth phase there are not further developments, is possible that the final Global Artificial Intelligence in the sixth phase, will be a new thesis in coming dialectic cycles.

Actually, as a suggestion, a possible seventh phase could be the unification of all reasons: the pure reason of the Global Artificial Intelligence in the second stage (list of analytical or mathematical categories, pure categories), the critical reason (in any rational contrast), the practical reason (combination of Unified Application and in general the four steps in real objective auto-replications, more concretely the Application System); in only one, the reason itself, developing all the functions previously developed by the others: pure, critical, practical; in only one, the reason itself, for the achievement of only one rational science, as unique science or unified science, to transcend the rational knowledge to the pure truth itself.

It is quite possible that after the sixth phases, any other phase onwards, will be beyond the human understanding.

Right now, the purpose of this post is the development of the general ideas regarding to the Modelling System in the third phase, the standardization process, which later will be developed its first, second, and third stage, in next posts.

Once I have located the third stage in the chronology, the next step is to locate the Modelling System and its role within the third stage of auto-replication in the standardization process.

The first model of Global Artificial Intelligence in the third phase emerges after the union of all specific matrix from all Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction in only one, the global matrix, as an application for the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence.

Once the global matrix is ready, as first stage of application in this first model of Global Artificial Intelligence, the tracking of this global matrix starts as second stage.

The tracking of the global matrix, alike the tracking of any specific matrix in the first phase, the tracking of any particular matrix in the fifth phase, or the tracking of the factual hemisphere of the matrix in the sixth phase, is the same: given a list of mathematical (analytical or pure ) categories (the pure reason), including in the pure reason all possible mathematical relations between factors ( as subjects and/or options), the tracking consist of: the attribution of mathematical (pure or analytical) categories of possible relations between factors (as subjects and/or as options) to every possible combination of factors ( as subjects and/or options) in the matrix ( in the first phase the specific matrix, in the third phase the global matrix, in the fifth phase the particular matrix, in the sixth phase the factual hemisphere of the matrix).

Examples of mathematical (analytical or pure) categories in the pure reason, were given in the post “The artificial method for the scientific explanation, the second stage in the integration process”. Although this post was written for the second stage in the sixth phase, the examples given are equally valid for any research by Deduction at any level: global, specific, particular; in phases first, third, fifth, and sixth.

The way to track the matrix does never change, what changes is: 1) what kind of matrix is tracked: specific matrix in the first phase, global matrix in the third phase, particular matrix in the fifth phase, or the factual hemisphere of the matrix in the sixth phase; and what levels in the matrix can be tracked.

This last question in the first phase is not a challenge, there is only one level associated with the specific matrix, in order to make only specific deductions.

But since the third stage, deductions can be made at three levels: global deductions, specific deductions, and particular deductions (this last one as a result to the parallel development of third and fifth phases).

The way in which all possible deduction can be made since the third phase, depends on how the absorption of the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, within the Global Artificial Intelligence, will be made, having two strategies for this absorption: negative (not recommended) and positive (recommended).

- Negative strategy (not recommended) for the absorption of Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction within the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, once their specific matrixes have been included in the global matrix: at the same time that all specific matrix is included in the global matrix as first stage of application for the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence, their respective former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction (whose specific matrixes has been already included in the global matrix), are eliminated, and the specific deductions that they had been doing in the specific matrix, from now onwards are specific deductions in the global matrix made by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

- Positive strategy (recommended) for the absorption of Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction within the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, once their specific matrixes have been included in the global matrix: at the same time that all specific matrix is included in the global matrix as first stage of application for the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence, their respective former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction (whose specific matrixes has been already included in the global matrix), can be transformed into specific deductive programs working within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, making specific deductions while the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is only focused on global deductions.

The reason why the negative strategy (the elimination of Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction in the standardization process, once their specific matrixes have been included in the global matrix) is not recommended, is because as long as the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, in their respective synthetic science, discipline, or activity such as economy, industry, security, surveillance, etc. is eliminated, in that case in addition to the global deductions across all science, disciplines, activities, that the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence must do, should do additionally all specific deduction for every specific synthetic science, discipline, or activity, previously made by the former Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction already eliminated.

If the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence must do: all possible global deduction coming up from combinations including and crossing factors (as subjects and/or as options) from different sciences, disciplines, and activities, and in addition to this incredible work, has to make as well specific deductions coming up from specific combination of factors (as subjects and/or as options) regarding to every specific synthetic science, every specific discipline, and every specific  activity, then the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is going to have a work overload, slowing down the work rhythm.

The fact that all specific matrixes are united in only one, the global matrix, in the standardization process, does not mean that is not necessary to make specific deductions for specific synthetic sciences, disciplines, activities, any more.

What the global matrix is going to allow is the possibility that, in addition to the specific deductions for specific synthetic sciences, disciplines, activities, from now onwards is possible to make as well deductions crossing and mixing globally factors from all sciences, disciplines, activities, so the possible global combinations to make global deductions, are combinations including, mixing and crossing globally factors (as subjects and/or as options) from different sciences, disciplines, and activities, at the same time that at specific level combinations of factors regarding to a specific synthetic science, specific discipline, or specific activity allow to make as well specific deductions.

The reason why the positive strategy for the absorption of the former Specific Artificial Intelligences within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence is more recommended, is because, 1) at the same time that the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence can make global deductions through the attribution of mathematical (analytic or pure) categories of relations to global combinations crossing, mixing, and including factors (as subjects and/or as options) from different sciences, disciplines, activities, 2) the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction now transformed into specific deductive programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, can also make specific deductions, continuing with the attribution of mathematical (pure or analytical) categories of relations to specific combinations of factors related to their respective synthetic science, discipline, activity such as economy, industry, security, surveillance, etc.

And another option, as long as Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction can be transformed into specific deductive programs within the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence making specific deductions while tracking the global matrix, other possibility is the transformation of some former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction in particular programs (second period of formation in the fifth phase), to be later united to particular applications, for the creation of particular applications for particular programs (third period of the fifth phase)

In short, what Impossible Probability recommends for the tracking of the global matrix in the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, is:

- In the global matrix, the tracking of global combinations of factors (as subjects and/or as options), including, mixing, and crossing factors from different sciences, disciplines, or activities, to make global deductions, by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, as a global deductive program.

- In the global matrix, the tracking of specific combinations of factors (as subjects and /or as options), including only factors which affect a specific science, specific discipline, or specific activity such as economy, industry, security, surveillance, combinations made by specific deductive programs (former Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction) in their respective specific science, discipline, or activity, in which they are specialised.

- In a particular matrix (including all factor, that affecting a particular thing or being, has been extracted from the global matrix by a  particular program, which previously could be a former Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction), tracking particular combinations of factors (as subjects and/or s options) in particular matrixes regarding to particular things or beings, to make particular deductions.

During the standardization process, as long as all specific matrixes are included in the global matrix, former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction can be transformed into specific deductive programs (to make specific deductions) or particular deductive programs (to make particular deductions).

The reason for the transformation of some Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction into specific deductive programs, while others are transformed into particular deductive programs, will depend on the criteria according to the scientific policy and what the Global Artificial Intelligence most needs to grow up.

At the end, as a result, the standardization process can make three kinds of deductions: global deductions, specific deductions, particular deductions.

Every deduction (global, specific, particular) is the formation of an empirical hypothesis by the attribution of a mathematical relation (pure reason) to every possible combination (global, specific, particular) of factors (including deductions made of only factors as subjects or options, and deductions including factors as subjects and as options).

Once every empirical hypothesis (global, specific, particular) has been rationally contrasted, if rational, passes to the rational truth, the database of rational hypothesis, where are gathered all rational hypothesis at any level: global, specific, particular; being the first stage of application for the Modelling System, and the Modelling System the first step within the third stage of real objective auto-replications in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

For that reason, in the rational truth, the database of rational hypothesis, there are least three kinds of rational hypothesis:

- Global rational hypothesis: rational hypothesis made of global combination of factors, crossing factors from different synthetic sciences, disciplines, and activities.

- Specific rational hypothesis: rational hypothesis regarding to a specific synthetic science, or a specific discipline, or a specific activity.

- Particular rational hypothesis: rational hypothesis made of factors regarding to a particular thing or being.

In the transformation process from the former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction to the new specific deductive programs, is important to quote that one difference in this transformation is the fact that the former strong academic limits, or even spatial limits, that previously have ruled the deduction process under the Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction, now in the global matrix are academic or spatial limits not so strong, but liquid.

When a specific deductive program has to choose what factors to include in any combination of factors regarding to its specific matter (science, discipline, activity), the factors to choose are not only restricted to the previous factors in its former specific matrix now included in the global matrix, because now the specific deductive program can include, in any specific combination of factors, any factor from any other science, discipline, or activity, that affecting its matter (science, discipline, activity) must be included in a specific combination to make specific deductions, regardless  of what specific matrix did the factor use to belong to.

Once the database of rational hypothesis, the rational truth, begins to fill with rational hypothesis, the Modelling System starts making single virtual models for every rational hypothesis (global, specific, particular), adding all the single virtual models to the global comprehensive virtual model (the global model), developing all virtual and actual, prediction and evolutionary, models, to make later decisions, as first step within the third stage of auto-replication, now in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

In order to locate the exact position of the Modelling System in the first model of Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, the way in which every stage in this first Global Artificial Intelligence is finally set up, is:

- First stage of the first model of the Global Artificial Intelligence: the global matrix, after the inclusion of all specific matrixes from all former Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction.

- Second stage: the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence as a global deductive program making global deductions, with the assistance of specific deductive programs for specific deductions, particular deduction programs for particular deductions. Specific and particular programs could have been previously former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, which during the standardization process have become specific or particular programs.

- Third stage of auto-replication: distinguishing objective auto-replications and subjective-auto-replications.

Objective auto-replications are: real objective auto-replications to make decisions to protect and better the real world and the global model itself (distributed in four steps, the first one the Modelling System), and knowledge objective auto-replications.

Knowledge objective auto-replications in the standardization process are: explicative knowledge objective auto-replications (all enhancements and improvements in: 1) the global matrix, due to only through more isomorphic factors is possible to explain better the reality, 2) the second stage as explanation stage itself, and 3) the rational truth as first stage in the Modelling System which affects the mathematical models in which the decisions are based), comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replications (in the standardization process, the most important improvements and enhancements as a result of comprehensive objective auto-replication, those ones on the list of synthetic categories in the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution, in part some of them thanks to the collaboration between by Deduction and by Application).

Subjective auto-replications are: robotic subjective auto-replications by the Artificial Engineering, and artificial psychological subjective auto-replications by the Learning System (for instance, changes in the pure reason in the second stage could be one of these, affecting models and decisions).

Among all possible auto-replication within the third stage, the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence is going to work within the real objective auto-replications, as those ones responsible for the decision making process to protect and better the real world and the global model (the global comprehensive model).

The way in which the decision process works, is throughfour steps: Modelling System, Decisional System, Application System, and Learning System.

- The modelling System, as first stage, gathers all rational hypothesis in the database of rational hypothesis, the rational truth, as second stage makes single virtual models based on each rational hypothesis to include in the global model (the global comprehensive virtual model), in addition to the modelling of: actual or virtual, prediction or evolutionary, models. And finally as a third stage, using the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution, makes decisions to include in the database of decisions.

- The Decisional System, as first stage gathers the decisions in the database of decisions, as second stage makes a mathematical project including all decisions to study their compatibility among them and the scientific policy, and as third stage those ones to be chosen are included in a database of instructions.

- The Application System, gathering all the instructions in a database of instructions, as second stage matches according to their purpose every instruction with the corresponding: intelligence, application or robotic device, to put it into practice (if there is no one able to do it, it can build that intelligence, program, application, able to do it); and finally studies the results obtained using the Impact of the Defect

- The results are gathered in a database as a first stage of application for the Learning System, whose second stage is the application of the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution across the entire Global Artificial Intelligence in order to detect the exact location of any possible failure, in any: system, program, or application; at any level: global, specific, particular; making as third stage as many decisions as possible to improve and enhance the Global Artificial Intelligence in any: system, program, application; in any level: global, specific, particular; decisions to be later included in the database of decisions in the first stage of the Decisional System, waiting for their authorization.

The exact location of the Modelling System in the standardization process, the third phase, is then to be the first step in the real objective auto-replications that take place in the third stage of auto-replication in the Global Artificial Intelligence.

The Modelling System in the standardization process is then: the first step in the third stage in the third phase; and in turn the Modelling System, as first step in the third stage in the third phase, is distributed through the three stages of application, replication, auto-replication.

The first stage of the Modelling System in the standardization process is the database of rational hypothesis, gathering all rational hypothesis at any level:  global rational hypothesis by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, specific rational hypothesis by specific deductive programs, and particular rational hypothesis by particular deductive programs. One way to organise the database of rational hypothesis is through the distribution of rational hypothesis by level: global, specific, and particular. And the section related to specific level, distributing the rational hypothesis by each specific science, discipline, activity, and for every specific science, discipline, activity, the distribution of rational hypothesis according to their mathematical relation, pure reason. At particular level, the distribution of rational hypothesis according to their particular thing or being, and within the rational hypothesis for each particular thing or being, organising the rational hypothesis of this particular thing or being according to their mathematical relation, pure reason.

The organization of the rational truth is then as follows:

- By level: the global section consists of all global rational hypothesis made by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, the specific section including all specific rational hypothesis made by any specific deductive program, the particular section for all particular rational hypothesis coming up from particular programs.

- In the global section the rational hypothesis are grouped according to their respective mathematical relation: distribution according to their pure reason.

- The specific section is distributed in sub-sections, having at least one sub-section for every specific deductive program, and every sub-section is distributed in sub-sub-sections according to the mathematical relation, pure reason, in each rational hypothesis made by every specific deductive program.

- The particular section is divided in sub-sections corresponding each of them to each particular thing or being with a particular program, and within every sub-section, sub-sub-sections according to the mathematical relation, pure reason, used in the rational hypothesis.

The second stage of the Modelling System in the standardization process, is the modelling of:

- Single virtual models

- The global comprehensive virtual model (the global model, in the standardization process the first global model)

-  The global actual model.

- The global virtual prediction model.

- The global actual prediction model.

- The global virtual evolution model,

- The global actual evolution model.

And finally the third stage for the Modelling System in the standardization process, the application of the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution to make protective and bettering research decisions, as real objective auto-replications, in order to make a better world, through the protection and the bettering of the global model, as well as other knowledge objective auto-replications, explicative or comprehensive, this comprehensive last one especially applied to the list of categories in the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution.

Once this post has set the exact location of the Modelling System in the standardization process, explained what is the standardization process, and the position and functions of the Modelling System in the this process, the next posts will develop deeper every stage in the Modelling System at this point, as first step in the third stage in the third phase.

Rubén García Pedraza, 16th of June of 2018