The
Modelling System is responsible for the decision-making process upon
mathematical representations of the world based on rational hypotheses. All the
rational hypotheses are gathered in the database of rational hypotheses, the
rational truth, as an application for the Modelling System, the first stage of the
Modelling System. The mathematical representations of the world are made
through mathematical operations, replicating mathematical human skills, as the replication stage of the Modelling System. And finally, upon the
mathematical representations, the Modelling System makes decisions in the third
stage.
The
way in which the decisions are made upon the mathematical representations of
the rational truth, is through the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution, in order to study what aspects in what models need to be
protected before any defect could produce serious damages, and what
aspects need to be bettered to achieve more efficiency, efficacy, and
productivity.
The
Impact of the Defect measures the damage produced by any defect in any system. The
Effective Distribution is another equation similar to the Impact of the
Defect, but to measure efficiency. Both are in
“Introducción a la Probabilidad Imposible, estadística de la probabilidad o probabilidad estadística”.
The
way in which both of them, Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution,
work is pretty similar; the only difference is the object to study, one is
negative, defects, in the other positive, the level of good qualities.
In
both of them is necessary to create a list of synthetic categories related to
their particular object: in Impact of the Defect, a list of categories related
to defects, in Effective Distribution, a list of categories related to
efficiency, efficacy, and productivity.
In
the Impact of the Defect, all the defects identified on the list are ordered from
the least to the most serious defect, so the least serious defect has the first
position in the ranking, position number “1 ̊”, first, while the most serious
defect is the defect whose “nº” position in the ranking is equal to the total number of categories, position
“Nº”.
In
the Effective Distribution, in the same way, the categories related to good
qualities (efficiency, efficacy, productivity), are ordered from the least to
the best quality, so the least quality has the first position number “1 ̊”,
first, in the ranking, while and the best quality is the quality whose “nº”
position is equal to the total number of categories, so is the quality position
“Nº”.
Once
it has been attributed a “nº” position to every category in the ranking, in
order to know the level of defect or the level of effectivity of any category,
is necessary to divide the “nº” position between “Nº”, and that is the weight
of defect or effectiveness that this category has in the ranking.
In
both of them, the seriation of every “nº”
position is the same but with a different
meaning, as the higher the “nº” position, the more serious the defect is in the
Impact of the Defect, better quality is in the Effective Distribution.
When
applying the Impact of the Defect or the Effective Distribution in any system,
we want to know which is the level of defect or effectiveness achieved for any
category. Firstly, we have to divide the “nº”
position of every category between “Nº”. After dividing “nº: Nº”, the
result is multiplied by the frequency or direct punctuation measured for the
respective category, and the product is divided by the total frequency or the
total of direct punctuations.
In
both, the equation is the same
"[xi · (nº: N º)] : Σxi "
The difference is in the meaning. In
the impact of the defect, the greater is the result of
"[xi· (nº: N º)]:
Σxi "
The more serious the defect is. But in the Effective Distribution, the largest is the result of
"[xi · (nº: Nº)] : Σxi ",
The better the quality is.
In
the end, the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution is a rational
number, and a rational number can be criticized, in order to know if the
defect is within or beyond the margin of error, or if the level of efficiency,
efficacy, productivity of that category is above or below the levels of
efficiency, efficacy, productivity, expected.
In
“Introducción a la Probabilidad Imposible, estadística de la probabilidad o
probabilidad estadística”, the rational equations for the rational
criticism of the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution, could be applied in the third stage of the Modelling System to make decisions
in order to protect and better the global model.
The
way in which is possible automation and standardization to make decisions
once the Impact of the Defect and the Effective Distribution has been
calculated, in the third stage of the Modelling System as first step in the
third stage of the Global Artificial Intelligence in the standardization process, is having previously experimented in the first phase very carefully at
specific level, in the first Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Decision in the first phase, how to link: possible results for
every defect in the Impact of the Defect and according to the results what protective
decisions should be made, and how to link possible results of Effective
Distribution and bettering decisions.
The
design of the third stage of the Modelling System in the Global Artificial
Intelligence in the standardisation process will be easier than previously, since
the first phase, every single aspect or problem related to how to link Impact of
the Defect and Effective Distribution and decisions has been previously tested.
In
the first phase, the creation of the first Specific Artificial Intelligences
for Artificial Research by Deduction, in the third stage of the first step
(Modelling System) in the third stage (decision stage), one way to link the Impact
of the Defect to protective decisions is through: the identification of what
categories have the most serious Impact of Defect, prioritizing the response to
assist those factors related to these categories.
For
instance, if a volcano erupts, automatically having instantaneously virtual and
actual models, virtual and actual prediction models, and virtual and actual
evolutionary models, about the results and consequences of this eruption,
automatically taking the information from the mathematical models to calculate
the Impact of the Defect of every single category related to the place where
the volcano has taken place, estimating the area affected, for instance the
range of action of the smoke, rivers of lava, explosions, etc. Then it is possible
to prioritise all those necessary actions to assist first the most affected
areas.
In
this process, one way in which the Impact of the Defect can work, is having
previously automatized a possible list of defects associated with eruptions,
locating every possible defect on the mathematical model of the eruption,
calculating the possible value for every defect in every location on the map
provided by the geometrical model of the eruption, it would be possible the
estimation and location of all those places in which the damage produced by the
volcano could be higher in: virtual and actual prediction and evolutionary models;
in order to make decisions about possible actions in all those locations with
the most important values of risk.
If
in the first phase for the creation of an Specific Artificial Intelligence for
Artificial Research by Deduction in a factory, from the outset if in the first
phase when the third stage of the first step of that Specific Artificial
Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction, when the list of categories
related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity in the factory was created, since
very early the design would have designed a very detailed list of categories
related to this good qualities, then from the very beginning at any time that
the Effective Distribution would have observed a lack of efficiency, efficacy,
productivity, in any system of the factory, having previously associated
possible actions for every category on the list, the observation of any problem
or difficulty in any system through the permanent surveillance provided by the
Effective Distribution, could be resolved on time putting into practice all
those actions previously designed for this problematic circumstances, in order
to better the productivity.
The
way to link Effective Distribution and decisions is through the prioritisation
of all those actions related to those categories with the lowest levels of
efficiency, efficacy, and productivity, in order to better the way in which
they work, increasing therefore efficiency, efficacy, and productivity.
If
from the outset, the first phase, with the first Specific Artificial Intelligences
for Artificial Research by Deduction, for instance, those related to
geology and climatic, are created lists of categories of possible defects
related to: volcanos, earthquakes, tsunamis, tornados, hurricanes, inundations, the impact of meteorites, etc. And for every level of a defect according to discrete
categories of possible values in the equation “[xi · (n º: N º)] : Σxi” for
every kind of defect, is possible to link possible decisions for every discrete
category for every kind of defect, then in accordance with the automatic
association of actions according to the gravity of the defect, in accordance
with the discrete category, at any time that there is a: volcano, earthquake,
tsunami, tornados, hurricane, inundation, the impact of a meteorite, etc; in any
location on Earth, only estimating virtual and actual models on time, and
virtual and actual prediction and evolutionary models, is possible to have an
estimation about the level of the Impact of the Defect from now to a
foreseeable future, making as many decisions as decisions are linked to every kind
of defect according to every discrete category of gravity.
While
in the first phase, the creation of the first Specific Artificial Intelligence
for Artificial Research by Deduction in geology, and the first Specific
Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction in climatic, for
every Specific Artificial Intelligence for Artificial Research by Deduction, at the third stage of their respective Modelling System the Impact of the Defect has,
in geology, a list of possible defects for eruptions, another for earthquakes,
other for tsunamis, and in climatic a possible list of defects for tornados,
another one for hurricanes, one more for inundations. While in the first phase, all these lists of defects are separated and possibly working in different
Specific Artificial Intelligences, instead, in the standardisation process in
the third stage of the Modelling System, all these lists could be standardised
and included in only one list, forming a Unified Impact of the Defect.
In
the same way, if all those Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial
Research by Deduction in many industrial activities since the first phase, in
the third stage of the Modelling System in their respective Effective Distribution,
is possible to make discrete categories grouping all the possible results in
the equation [xi · (n º: N º)] : Σxi”, and for every discrete category to link
possible decisions to better the efficiency, efficacy, productivity, especially
for the lowest discrete categories, by the time that the standardization
process starts, all those list of possible categories related to efficiency,
efficacy, productivity, in every Specific Artificial Intelligence for
Artificial Research by Deduction, could be all of them united in only one Unified
Effective Distribution.
If,
regardless of the matter (science, discipline, activity), all lists of
categories related to defects, from all former Specific Artificial Intelligences by Deduction,
are lists integrated in only one list of defects including all possible defects
from former Specific Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, then the result is the creation of a unified list of defects for the
creation of a Unified Impact of the Defect, able to measure the Impact of the
Defect in any aspect in any mathematical model in order to make decisions to
protect the global model from any possible damage that it could suffer, from
now to a foreseeable future.
If,
regardless of the matter (science, discipline, activity), all lists of
categories related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity, from all former
Specific Artificial Intelligence by Deduction, are lists integrated in only one list of
categories related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity including all possible
categories related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity from former Specific
Artificial Intelligences for Artificial Research by Deduction, then the result
is the creation of a unified list of categories related to efficiency,
efficacy, productivity for the creation of a Unified Effective Distribution,
able to measure the level of efficiency, efficacy, productivity in any aspect
in any mathematical model in order to make decisions to better the global
model, from now to a foreseeable future.
Through
the creation of a Unified Impact of the Defect to make protective decisions,
and the Unified Effective Distribution to make bettering decisions, based all
of them upon the results given by the artificial research, whose (global,
specific, particular) rational hypotheses are represented in virtual and
actual, prediction and evolutionary, models, finally, the possible decisions to
make through this technology, at any level (global, specific, particular),
virtually and actually, from now to a foreseeable future, are:
At the global level:
-
Global protective single descriptive research decisions
-
Global bettering single descriptive research
decisions.
-
Global protective specific comprehensive descriptive research decisions
-
Global bettering specific comprehensive descriptive
research decisions
- Global protective specific actual descriptive research decisions
-
Global bettering specific actual descriptive research
decisions.
- Global protective virtual prediction research decisions
- Global bettering virtual
prediction research decisions.
- Global protective actual prediction research decision.
-
Global bettering actual prediction research decision
- Global protective virtual evolution research decision
- Global bettering virtual evolution research decision
- Global protective actual evolution research decision
- Global protective actual evolution research decision
- Global bettering actual
evolution research decision
At a specific level (during the coexistence period made by Specific Artificial Intelligences by Deduction, and in the consolidation period by specific programs):
-
Specific protective single descriptive research decisions
-
Specific bettering single descriptive research
decisions.
-
Specific protective specific comprehensive descriptive research decisions
-
Specific bettering specific comprehensive descriptive
research decisions
- Specific protective specific actual descriptive research decisions
-
Specific bettering specific actual descriptive research
decisions.
- Specific protective virtual prediction research decisions
- Specific bettering virtual prediction
research decisions.
- Specific protective actual prediction research decision.
-
Specific bettering actual prediction research decision
- Specific protective virtual evolution research decision
- Specific bettering virtual
evolution research
- Specific protective actual evolution research decision
- Specific bettering actual
evolution research decision
At a particular level is possible even to distinguish two types of particular
decisions, those ones made directly by the Modelling System in the Global
Artificial Intelligence (especially because in these ones the Global Artificial
Intelligence can cross and mix information coming from different factors at a different level of sub-factoring capable of affecting any particular thing or
being, when they are factors maybe not already included in the particular
matrix in the particular deductive program), and all those decisions at
particular level made by the particular program through the factors included in
the particular matrix (once the fifth phase starts the formation of particular programs). Distinguishing particular decisions made by the
Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, and particular
decisions made by particular programs, in any case, all particular decisions
could be classified as:
- particular
protective single descriptive research decisions
- particular
bettering single descriptive research decisions.
- particular
protective specific comprehensive descriptive research
decisions
- particular
bettering specific comprehensive descriptive research
decisions
- particular
protective specific actual descriptive research decisions
- particular
bettering specific actual descriptive research decisions.
- particular
protective virtual prediction research
decisions
- particular
bettering virtual prediction research decisions.
- particular
protective actual prediction research decision.
- particular
bettering actual prediction research decision
- particular
protective virtual evolution research
decision
- particular
bettering virtual evolution research
- particular
protective actual evolution research
decision
- particular
bettering actual evolution research decision
In
the evolution from the third phase, the standardization process, to the sixth phase, the integration process, the specific level is going to disappear, due
to many specific deductive programs as long as the global matrix evolves
to a sub-factoring system, tracking the
specific deductive programs their former specific matrices now as a flow of
packages of information, during this evolution some specific deductive programs
will start tracking in their respective flow of packages of information the
sub-flow of sub-packages of information of new sub-factors recently added to
the global matrix, being added these new sub-flows of sub-packages of
information of this new sub-factors, to the current factors already working
within the global matrix, like a Russian dolls system.
In
essence, a simplification process in order to simplify to minimise the number
of main factors in the global matrix, by the inclusion of as many factors as
possible as sub-factors within the flow of packages of information of other
factors, at any level of sub-factoring.
Parallely,
at the same time that specific deductive programs are transformed into global
deductive programs, there are other Specific Artificial Intelligences for
Artificial Research by Deduction that are going to be transformed into
particular deductive programs,
This
process in which the specific level will be absorbed within the global level,
while others are transformed into particular programs, is part of the process
that takes place in the third phase, whose last result in the integration
process is the disappearance of the specific level completely, remaining only
two levels, global and particular.
But
in the standardization process, still third phase, especially in the earliest
moments of this phase, when it is already being created, makes sense the
consideration of three levels, global, specific, and particular, and for every
level, there will be three types of deductions: global deductions, specific
deductions, particular deductions; which after rational criticism are going to
result: global rational hypothesis, specific rational hypothesis, particular
rational hypothesis; whose single virtual models are going to be represented, in
order to be included in the global comprehensive virtual model (the global
model), as well as the global actual model, and all those virtual and actual,
prediction and evolutionary, models, mathematical representations of the world where is possible to make protective or bettering: global, specific, and
particular decisions, based on the previous artificial research.
At
any time that the Unified Impact of the Defect is applied to study the impact of
any defect in a single virtual model made of a global rational hypothesis (made by the Artificial Research by Deduction in the Global Artificial Intelligence, in other words, the global program), is a
global protective single descriptive research decision.
But using the Unified Effective Distribution is a global bettering single descriptive research decision.
If
the single virtual model is made upon a specific rational hypothesis (made by a Specific Artificial intelligence by Deduction, especially in the coexistence period, or in the consolidation period by a specific program, in addition to any other remaining Specific Artificial intelligence by Deduction), in that
case, those decisions made after the application of the Unified Impact of the
Defect, are specific protective single descriptive research
decisions. But using the Unified Effective Distribution is specific bettering single descriptive research decisions.
And
applied to virtual single models of particular rational decisions (mostly made by particular programs, in addition to any possible decision by the global program with particular implications): particular protective single descriptive research decisions, and particular bettering single descriptive research decisions.
When
the global, specific, particular, single virtual model, is added to the global
model, and once it has passed the fourth rational check, then applying the
Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution, is
possible to make global, specific or particular, protective or bettering,
comprehensive descriptive research decisions.
When
the current global model (once it has been updated with the new single global,
specific, or particular, single virtual models), is synthesized with the global
matrix, once it has passed the fifth rational check, then after the application
of the Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution, is
possible to make global, specific or particular, protective or bettering,
actual descriptive research decisions.
Once
the rational hypothesis has been perfectly tested after five rational checks, the
last one having a place in the actual model is possible to make very reliable
predictions, and upon the predictions, dynamic models about the possible
evolution from now to such prediction.
Having
finally been passed the fifth rational check in the actual model, after the
addition of a global, specific, or particular, rational hypothesis, and having
made a prediction of the future and the possible evolution, in the dynamic
representation of this evolution in the virtual evolutionary model, and after
updating this evolution including in the calculus all possible variation caused
by the new global, specific or particular rational hypothesis: then upon this
new updated virtual evolutionary model after the inclusion of the new global,
specific or particular, rational hypothesis, the application of the Unified
Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution, to make global,
specific or particular, protective or bettering virtual
evolution research decisions.
And
by the time the virtual evolutionary model is synthesized with the expected
values, after having passed the sixth rational check the new actual global
model (as a result of the new changes introduced by the new global, specific or
particular rational hypothesis in the actual evolutionary model), over the
results in the sixth rational check caused by this new global, specific or
particular, rational hypothesis, the application again of the Unified Impact of
the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution to make global, specific or
particular, protective or bettering actual
evolution research decisions.
Once
all the improvements in the global model have been made after the sixth rational
check, making as many changes as necessary, fixing all the contradictions
detected once the sixth rational check has assessed the new changes caused in
the evolution model by the introduction of this new global, specific or
particular, rational hypothesis, is when the final prediction is made, creating
the final virtual prediction model, and after the application of the Unified
Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution, over this final
virtual prediction model gathering all the changes caused by the new global,
specific or particular, rational hypothesis, to make then global, specific or
particular, protective or bettering, virtual prediction research decisions.
And
finally, after the seventh rational check, when contrasting the actual
prediction model is criticised any possible contradiction between the real
values and the expected values, now new expected values after the changes
introduced by the inclusion of the new global, specific or particular, rational
hypothesis, and all the chain reaction of changes in the last six rational
checks, having finished all the rational checks with this last one, the seventh
rational check, and applying the Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified
Effective Distribution upon the results in the seventh and last rational check,
to make then global, specific, particular, protective or bettering, actual prediction
research decisions.
Always,
and absolutely always, regardless of the level in which any rational hypothesis
or change has been previously made: global, specific, or particular; is
advisable in the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence to
apply the Unified Impact of the Defect, where all possible defect must be
included, and the Unified Effective Distribution, where all possible good
quality related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity, must be gathered,
because at any time that there is the least minimum change in a mathematical
model, even the most pretty menial change can determine the whole future of the
whole world.
From a dialectical perspective, concepts traditionally viewed as opposites may exhibit interconnectedness, suggesting that determinacy and indeterminacy can influence each other in complex ways within the system's analytical framework.
In the future development of Global Artificial Intelligence, it is conceivable that even minimal environmental changes, such as the movement of a butterfly, could be analysed to predict subtle impacts on a global scale, reflecting the system's advanced sensitivity and predictive capabilities..
Dialectically, the reality is a continuum of changes, finally, the application
of the Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution is
going to be permanent.
The
Modelling System is a permanent system of surveillance, making permanent
decisions to be assessed at any time by the Decisional System so as to be
authorised.
Research decisions made by the Modelling System in the third stage, along
with the decisions made by the Modelling System in the first stage regarding what intelligences, programs, applications are allowed to have access to
the rational truth, to make the regular rational checks or exchange relevant
information with their correspondent databases, are decisions that the
Modelling System send to the database of decisions as application, first stage,
in the Decisional System, in order to assess what decisions to put into
practice by the Application System, whole process later evaluated by the
Learning System.
The
database of decisions, as an application for the Decisional System, also includes
all robotic decisions to build new intelligences, programs, applications
(robotic subjective auto-replications), as well as all artificial psychology
subjective auto-replications.
The
making decision process explained in this post, in the third stage of the Global Artificial
Intelligence belongs to the real objective auto-replications, as those
replications whose last objective is the protection, improvement, and enhancement
of the global model.
In
addition to the real objective auto-replications, other objective
auto-replications are explicative and comprehensive knowledge objective
auto-replications.
As
it was said when I analysed the third stage in the Modelling System in the
first phase, in order to create the list of defects in the Unified Impact of
the Defect, and the list of categories related to efficiency, efficacy, productivity,
in the Unified Effective Distribution, would be advisable set up relations of
collaboration between the Unified Application and the Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, due to there are many links between both
structures, the most important the fact that both works with synthetic
categories from the real world.
In
order to improve and enhance the list of categories in the Unified Impact of the
Defect and the Unified Effective Distribution, there must be connections
between the list of categories in both of them and the conceptual: schemes,
maps, sets, models; in the Unified Application, due to there are going to be
many occasions in which: only having this conceptual schemes, maps, sets,
models, and automatically assign a position in the ranking according to the
level of risk or good quality, in every moment, then the list of categories
organised as a ranking would be ready.
In
fact, the Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective
Distribution can take under consideration other previous lists to borrow from the conceptual: schemes, maps,
sets, models; as well as any new category that
could be added from the synthetic world, renewing at any time the possible list
of categories, in the Unified Impact of the Defect and the Unified Effective
Distribution.
The
possible collaboration between deep artificial comprehension (conceptual schemes, maps, sets, models, in the Unified Application), and the Unified
Impact of the Defect and Unified Effective Distribution could produce comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replications, at any
time that the deep artificial comprehension causes changes due to modifications or eliminations in conceptual: schemes, maps, sets, models; with consequences in those categories shared with Unified Impact of the Defect
and the Unified Effective Distribution.
Regarding explicative knowledge objective auto-replications, in the first stage of the
Modelling System in the Global Artificial Intelligence, due to relations of
collaboration with other intelligences, programs, and applications, any change
in the rational truth for the inclusion, modification, or elimination of any
rational hypothesis can cause a chain reaction of changes in all those
intelligences, programs, applications, in which those rational hypothesis
affected had been shared.
For
instance, changes in a rational hypothesis: transformed into factors as options
in the global matrix, as categories in the Unified Application, or borrowed by a particular matrix; are going to produce changes in relation to this rational
hypothesis in the global matrix, the Unified Application, and the particular
matrix.
And
vice versa, for instance, a particular rational hypothesis made by a particular
deductive program taking combinations of factors in its particular matrix, when
sharing this particular rational hypothesis with the rational truth in the
Global Artificial Intelligence, if the particular deductive program over time
makes changes in this rational hypothesis, these changes affect as well the
rational truth and all the mathematical models in which this rational
hypothesis has been added as a single virtual model.
And
finally, the most important explicative knowledge objective auto-replications
in the Modelling System are all those corresponding to the second, and third
(although the responsible for this one is the deductive program, but is made in
the rational truth, therefore the application of the Modelling System), fourth,
fifth, sixth, seventh, rational checks. The only rational check out of the
Modelling System is the first one. In short, the seven rational checks are:
-
First rational check: the rational criticism of the empirical hypothesis made
by the global, specific, or particular, deductive program.
-
Second rational check: the application of the Modelling System checks rationally
if there is any contradiction between any new, global, specific, particular,
rational hypothesis added and the current ones already included.
-
Third rational check: the global, specific, particular, programs at regular
times check that their rational hypotheses are still rational.
-
Fourth rational check: once every single virtual model from any global,
specific, particular, rational hypothesis, is included in the global model, it is
checked if there is no contradiction between this single virtual model and any other in the global model. The fourth rational check takes place in the
global model.
-
Fifth rational check: in the actual model, contrasting whether the real values
from the global matrix, within the margin of error, do not have contradictions
with the values expected according to the global model.
-
Sixth rational check: in the actual evolution model, it is checked if the values
expected in every moment of the model do not have contradictions, beyond the
margin of error, with the real values as long as the evolution progresses.
- Seventh
rational check: in the actual prediction model, it is checked if the values
expected in the actual prediction model do not have contradictions, beyond the
margin of error, with the real values, as long as the foreseeable moment is
coming.
The
proposal of Impossible Probability for the construction of the first model of
Global Artificial Intelligence, once the standardization process is ready, is
only a proposal that I am sure that it can be improved and enhanced thanks to
the contribution of as many new ideas and proposals can be made from different
mathematical traditions and philosophies.
My contribution
to the development of the first Global Artificial Intelligence emerges as a
very idealistic and rationalist perspective about what Artificial Intelligence
means, but from other perspectives and points of view, this approach could also
be bettered.
Especially,
my perception of how to link mathematical models and decisions using the Impact
of the Defect and the Effective Distribution, although I think that it is a
good method, I am sure that probable combinations of this contribution, and
some equations of artificial learning, could be applied successfully.
Because
I try to make a model of decisions based only on artificial research, not on
artificial learning, is the reason why I try to avoid linking mathematical
representation of the world and artificial learning to make decisions, although
is another way of investigation that could be explored by those agencies
already engaged in the race for the construction of the first model of Global
Artificial Intelligence.
In
fact, in the next range of posts that I will publish related to the Modelling
System at a particular level, in the case of particular matrices, models,
decisions, for human beings, is unavoidable to speak about cyborg psychology,
and within the cyborg, psychology is very important to point out that in
addition to all those decisions in the Modelling System based on artificial
research, maybe is necessary to highlight the importance that is going to have
all those decisions in cyborg psychology linked with artificial learning.
Rubén García Pedraza, 24th of June of 2018, London
Reviewed 24 August 2019 Madrid
Reviewed 24 August 2019 Madrid
Reviewed 17 August 2023 Madrid
Reviewed 10 May 2025, London, Leytostone
imposiblenever@gmail.com
