Particular Application System, third stage

In the third stage, the particular Application System as an outer instructions application sub-system makes the seventh rational supervision, consisting of the report about the performance of every instruction applied, having as sources of information the previous report sent by the robotic devices as the third stage of the robotic devices.

The particular Application System as outer sub-system, as any other intelligence, program, or application, is organised in three stages, the first one as application is the particular database of instructions, the second one the replication of all the cognitive human skills to perform the instructions, the third one as auto-replication the elaboration of reports which are later sent to the Learning System, in addition to the Decisional System, to make improvements over the results obtained during the performance.

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, as replication of all the human psychological skills to perform the instructions, the first psychological skill to replicate is the possibility to attribute every instruction (robotic function) to the right robotic device, in the same way that our brain attribute actions to our muscles, or in the same way that while working we attribute functions to our tools.

Once the particular Application System as outer sub-system attributes every instruction to a robotic device, the way in which the robotic device is going to perform the instruction is through a similar organization in three stages, the first one as application the individual database of instructions assigned to this device, the second one the performance of the instruction according to the capabilities of this device, and final  as third stage as soon the performance of the instruction is finished, the elaboration of a concrete report of every single instruction using for that purpose a concrete Impact of the Defect and a concrete Effective Disrtribution.

The concrete report as a result of the third stage of the robotic device is sent to, depending on what type of instruction is, the source of every instruction, having every instruction possible different sources, some of them internal, others external, and among the external, direct instructions to the robotic device skipping the particular Application System.

In general, according to the classification of instructions in the individual database of instructions as the first stage of the robotic device, the source that sends the concrete report is:

- If internal instruction, the robotic device sends the concrete report to the particular Application System for which it works.

- If external regular instruction, the robotic device sends the concrete report to the other different particular Application System, which previously sent the instruction directly to that robotic device, skipping the particular Application Program for which this device works.

- Full monitoring instructions, the robotic device sends the concrete report directly to the global Application System.

In short, depending on the origin of the instructions, internal or external, the robotic device sends the concrete reports to different agents. Only when the origin of the instruction is internal, the robotic device sends the concrete report to the particular Application for which it is working, otherwise, it sends the concrete report to a different agent, another different particular Application System if external regular instruction, or the global Application System if full monitoring level instruction.

Because the particular Application System has the possibility to match instructions to: 1) its own robotic devices (internal instructions), or 2) robotic devices working for another different particular program/application (external instructions), within the external instructions, has the option to send, 2.1) external instructions directly to that external robotic device (advisable only for external regular instructions), or 2.2) instructions to that other particular Application System (particular-to-particular instructions) to manage the external instruction including it in its particular database of instructions (only if the origin is able to or allow to send instructions to that other program/application), or 2.3) instructions to the global Application System, because only robotic devices working at global level can perform the instruction (particular-to-global), or 2.4) because this particular program/application is not able to or allow to send the instruction to that other particular program/application, and send the instruction to the global Application System waiting that it resends the instruction to the particular Application System receptor.

In sum, the instructions could be: internal or external; if external, not skipping the particular Application System receptor, or skipping the particular System receptor. If external and not skipping the receptor: particular-to-particular, particular-to-global, particular-global-particular; if external and skipping the receptor: external regular instructions and full monitoring instructions.

According to this classification the concrete reports that the particular Application System can receive are reports from those actors responsable for the application of the instructions. as long as it sends instructions to different agents: its own robotic devices (internal instructions), the global Application System to perform the instruction at global level (particular-to-global), different particular Application Systems (particular-to-particular), the global Application System to resend the instruction to the right particular Application System (particular-global-particular), directly to robotic devices working for different programs/applications (external regular instructions).

And according to this classification, the particular Application System should not receive any concrete report of those instructions performed by its own robotic devices, but sent by other agent skipping this particular Application System: 1) when the robotic devices of a particular Application System receives an external regular instruction, the robotic devices should not communicate the concrete report to their own particular Application System, only to that other different particular Application System origin of this external instruction, and 2) in full monitoring instructions, the robotic devices send the concrete report directly to the global Application System, no their own particular Application System.

This means that when an instruction has not been included in the first stage of the particular Application System as particular database of instructions, if there is no record of an external instruction in the particular database of instructions, because it was skipped by that other different agent, sending that other different agent the instruction directly to these robotic devices, these robotic devices do not have to send any concrete report to their own particular Application System because there is no record of that external decision in the particular database of instruction, sending only the robotic devices the report to that other different agent, global or that other different particular program/application whose global or particular database of instructions has records of this external instruction performed by these robotic devices.

The robotic devices only should communicate the reception of that direct external instruction, skipping the particular database of instructions in the particular outer sub-system, if it is an external extreme or high extreme instruction, or full monitoring instruction coming up from extreme or high extreme global decisions, or a new global order, which is going to interfere with the performance of other internal or external instructions whose priority level is not as high as these ones, able to cause further changes in the particular program, as soon these direct external instructions to the device are performed.

Only external direct instructions to devices as extreme or high extreme external instructions or related to external extreme or high extreme decisions, or new global orders, should be communicated to the particular Application System for which habitually the devices are working, otherwise external regular instructions or full monitoring instructions not interfering with the particular plan, do not have to be communicated to the particular Application System.

One important reason why under some circumstances direct external instructions to devices is a good option, especially when the security of the device and the program is completely assured, as for instance in regular instructions or full monitoring instructions, is the fact that as long as some instructions can avoid their inclusion in the particular database of instructions in the particular Application System, being added directly on the individual database of instructions in the device, this different process not managed by the particular program/application directly, as direct external instructions to the device, can avoid the funnel effect on the particular database of instructions as first stage of the outer sub-system.

In my last post, for instance, I had suggested the possibility to avoid as much as possible external direct instructions to the devices unless these external direct instructions to the devices are regular instructions or full monitoring instructions, among these last ones able to include new global orders, and extreme and high extreme global instructions.

But what today I have realised is the possibility that the normalization and standardization of external direct regular instructions to devices, complying with all the security protocols to protect the devices and the particular plan (synthesis of the particular model and particular project), what these external direct regular instructions to devices are going to facilitate, is to avoid the funnel effect on the particular database of instructions in the particular outer sub-system, redirecting directly the instructions to the individual database of instruction in the device, what could make faster the process for those regular instructions with low risk.

In any case, when a robotic device during the supervision or performance of any external direct instruction, regular or full monitoring, realises that it could have further contradictions with the internal instructions, or any other external instruction included in the particular database of instructions, being contradictions which might need extreme or high extreme instructions, made directly from the device, or need to be made by the outer sub-system, as soon these contradictions are observed, should be communicated with its outer sub-system to solve the situation saving any contradiction affecting its particular plan.

Unless an external direct instruction to a device, regular or full monitoring, is communicated to the particular Application System for which the device is working, the particular Application System as outer sub-system would not need the concrete report of external direct instructions received by devices.

The third stage of the particular Application System is going to work only with the  concrete reports, as third stage of the devices, sent to the third stage of the particular Application System, being concrete reports: 1) either attached to instructions previously included and managed from the first stage in the particular database of instructions, or 2) concrete reports made by the devices regarding to external direct instructions which needed to be communicated to the particular outer sub-system due to further contradictions with the particular plan or other external instructions within the particular database of instructions and matched to that robotic device.

As soon the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system receives the concrete reports, starts working on the seventh rational supervision, whose result is to make the seventh singular rational supervision for every single instruction in the particular database of instruction, seventh comprehensive rational supervision taking as a whole the concrete reports of all the instructions within the same range of instructions belonging to the same decision, and the seventh total rational supervision.

The seventh singular rational supervision made in the third stage of the particular Application System, as an outer sub-system consists of:

- The  concrete report sent by the robotic device, based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution, including any contradiction in the second, third, fifth, rational supervisions.

 - Any contradiction found in the first rational supervision as first stage, among them the most important the identification of fourth rational contradictions (contradiction between the mathematical operation behind the decision and the instruction, this could be identifiable by indirect ways, for instance, within a range of instructions destined to one subject, the inclusion of instructions for a very different subject).

- Once the instruction is matched with a device in the second stage of the outer sub-system, if there has been committed a fifth rational contradiction (between instruction and robotic device, fifth rational contradiction that must be reflected as well in the concrete report of that device which sent back the instruction), as soon the robotic device sends back the instruction to the second stage of the outer sub-system, the instruction is re-attributed to the right device, incident that should be reflected on the seventh singular report.

- If as a result of the attributional process the instruction is matched to different programs or external devices,  working as an external instruction (particular-to-global, particular-to/global-particular) or an external direct regular instruction, assessing how this attributional process worked in all levels, the collaboration between particular/global, particular/particular, and the level of performance of the collaboration itself, in addition to the level of performance during the implementation of the instruction itself.

All possible incident, contradiction, impact, error, mistake, lack of efficiency, happening during the performance of any instruction by a robotic device, must be encoded, encrypted and added as a concrete category of error in the concrete list of errors in the concrete Impact of the Defect or concrete Effective Distribution, as to make the concrete report that in the third stage the device must send to the respective particular Application System.

In addition to the concrete report, any incident, contradiction, impact, error, mistake, lack of efficiency identified in the first supervision or matching instructions and devices, must be encoded, encrypted and added to the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution, so as to get an encoded and encrypted assessment of the processes done during the first and second stage, to add to the particular report.

The seventh singular rational supervision consists of: 1) the concrete report made by the device based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution, plus 2) the particular report made by the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system assessing how this single instruction was managed in the first and second stage of the particular Application System.

The seventh singular rational supervision of any single instruction, is the synthesis of the information obtained by the concrete report of this single instruction made by the device responsible of the performance of this instruction, using the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution of that device, plus the particular report that the particular Application System as outer sub-system can make applying the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution, particular to the third stage of this outer sub-system, to assess how was the management of any instruction in the particular database of instructions as first stage of the particular Application System, and how was the attributional process in the second stage of the particular Application System.

The seventh comprehensive rational supervision consists of, instead of the evaluation of every instruction individually, the evaluation of the whole branch of instructions belonging to the same range of instructions from the same decision, evaluating as a whole:

- Evaluation of the management in the first stage, how was the first rational supervision as a whole for the instructions of the same decision, any contradiction in the first rational supervision, or even an evaluation of any incident, error, mistake during the process to file every instruction in the right file in the particular database of instructions, encoding and encrypting in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution any error, mistake, problem, in any part of the process.

- Evaluation of the management of all the instructions from the same decision in the second stage, encoding and encrypting in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect or comprehensive Effective Distribution any error, mistake, contradiction, incident, during the management of the whole brunch of decisions during the attributional process or during the performance of these instructions from the same decision from one or more different devices, working for this particular Application System (internal instructions), or for different Application Systems (external instructions), regardless of their level, global or particular, or how was the attribution of external direct instructions to devices from other programs.

The difference between the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution and the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution, is the fact that the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution are focused on particular categories of error or efficiency related to how was the management of every single instruction separately, as single identities. While the comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution are focused on categories of error or efficiency related to the management of the whole branch of instructions related to the same decision.

While the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution can work on categories of error or efficiency related to single instructions, for instance, categories of error or efficiency related to single internal instructions, categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions, not direct and direct, distinguishing between:

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-to-global instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-to-particular instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external instructions as single particular-global-particular instructions.

- Categories of error or efficiency related to single external direct regular instructions.

While the particular Impact of the Defect and the particular Effective Distribution only have categories of error or mistake to analyse the management of every instruction, including specifically categories of error or efficiency to analyse individually internal and external instructions, analysing individually, one by one: particular-to-global, particular-to-particular, particular-global-particular, external direct regular instructions.

The comprehensive Impact of the Defect and the comprehensive Effective Distribution should include categories of error or efficiency about the whole management of a whole range of instructions from the same decision, whose instruction can have a great diversity, including internal and external instructions, and as external instructions particular-to-particular and/or particular-to/global-particular and/or regular instructions.

Another difference between the particular report for every particular instruction as a result of the seventh singular rational supervision, and the comprehensive report for a whole range of instructions from the same decision as a result of the seventh comprehensive rational supervision is the fact that those external instructions included in the particular database of instructions as receptor, but whose decision is located in another different program or the Global Artificial Intelligence itself as original source, as long this particular Application System as outer sub-system receptor is not managing the whole range of instructions of this external instruction in its particular database, therefore the particular database of instructions as receptor only has some external instructions related to that decision made in other original program, because the particular Application System of this program/application as receptor is not managing the whole range of instructions of that decisión, whose origin is external, the receptor can not make the seventh comprehensive rational supervision of external instructions whose original decision was made by another external program. As a receptor of that external instruction, the particular Application System as receptor only will make a seventh singular rational supervision, to send later to the origin of that instruction, and is the original program, having received the report sent by the receptor, then the original program is responsible of that seventh comprehensive rational supervision including that external instruction attributed to that different program as receptor.

For that reason, not all instruction in a particular database of instructions will be part of a seventh comprehensive rational supervision, those external instructions located within a particular program/application as receptor, the receptor is not responsible for the seventh rational supervision of that range of instructions where is located this external instruction, the receptor only makes the seventh singular rational supervision to send to the original source of this instruction, global or particular.

In the same way, not all instructions included in the particular database of instructions will be object to a seventh total rational supervision, due to this supervision is the synthesis of the seventh singular and the seventh comprehensive rational supervision. Synthesising in a total Impact of the Defect the categories of error stated in the concrete list of errors in the concrete Impact of the Defect, and the particular list of errors in the particular Impact of the Defect, and the comprehensive list of errors in the comprehensive Impact of the Defect,  to make a total Impact of the Defect. And synthesising the concrete, particular, and comprehensive list of categories of efficiency in the concrete, particular, comprehensive Effective Distribution to create the total Effective Distribution, as a synthesis of these last ones.

The seventh total rational supervision is the synthesis of the seventh comprehensive rational supervision and the seventh singular rational supervision, this last one in turn synthesis of the concrete report and the particular report, concrete report based on the concrete Impact of the Defect and the concrete Effective Distribution used by the concrete device to make the sixth rational supervision, and particular report as a result to synthesis the concrete report with the evaluation made in the third stage of the particular Application System, using the particular Impact of the Defect and particular Effective Distribution, evaluating individually the management of every single instruction in the particular database of instructions and the individual result of the first rational supervision in every individual instruction, and how was individually the attribution of every instruction to their respective, internal or external, device.

The comprehensive Impact of the Defect must include all categories of error related to the whole management of a brunch of instructions, related to the same decisión, within the first and second stages in the particular Application System, and the comprehensive Effective Distribution categories of efficiency related to the management of the whole brunch of instructions, related to the same decisión, within the first and second stages in the particular Application System.

The seventh total rational supervision is a general statement, encoded and encrypted, synthesising how, in general, all instruction at the concrete and individual level was performed, and how, in general, the whole branch of instructions from the same decision was performed.

As soon as every seventh rational supervision: singular, comprehensive, total; is done, it is sent by the third stage of the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system to the corresponding source or origin. Logically, due to the seventh total rational supervision is the synthesis of the seventh singular and comprehensive rational supervisions, these are the first one to be completed, and the seventh total rational supervision is the last one, and as soon as every one of them is finished, not needing to wait the completion of the three seventh rational supervisions, the reports are sent to the source or origin of every individual, internal or external, instruction, particular/global Decisional/Application System, and their corresponding particular/global Learning System.

One reason to send the reports to the Decisional Systems, is to make further decisions if necessary, if the results could provoke some consequences on the particular project, turning the decisions already completed off the project, as soon as all the instructions regarding the same decision are finished. If the reports are sent to a different Application or Decisional System, instead to its own Decisional System, is because is an external instruction, and as soon that the receptor makes its respective reports, sending the reports to the original Decisional System, the decision will be off that original project, in addition to further decisions that that project could make according to the results.

The importance to send the reports to the right Learning System, depending on what type of instruction or brunch of instructions it is, is because the Learning System will use these reports to fulfil the rational critiques, and to track with its own model of Impact of the Defect and Effective Distribution the whole process and how that intelligence, program, application, works.

According to the source or origin of an instruction, the report is sent to:

- Low monitoring instructions, the third stage of the particular Application System sends the seventh rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional and Learning Systems.

- Lower intermediate monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional and Learning Systems (although the origin of the decision is the global Modelling System, all the process of how to distribute the decision into instructions was made at a particular level).

- Upper intermediate monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to its own particular Decisional System, having as an option to send the results as well to the global Decisional  System and global Learning System (the decision was managed first by the global Decisional System and communicated to the particular Decisional System).

- High monitoring instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular, comprehensive, total, rational supervisions to the global Decisional System and global Learning System.

- Particular-to/global-particular instructions, the particular Application System sends the singular supervisions to that other particular program/application, sending these supervisions to the particular Decisional System and particular Learning System of this other program.

- In case that external direct instructions to devices, skipping firstly the particular database of instructions, was later communicated to the particular database of instructions to research for contradictions in case that it could interfere with the particular plan, according to the origin of this external direct instructions, global or particular, seventh singular rational instructions could be sent to the Decisional System and Learning System of that source, global or particular.

As knowledge objective auto-replication should considered any change in any rational hypothesis as a consequence that as soon an instruction is about to be applied, but in the rational supervisions is found a full contradiction, not being possible to adapt the inferior instructions, therefore the inferior instruction is back to the source, firstly the particular Decisional System trying to rearrange the instruction, and if not possible sending back the decision to the particular Modelling System, if the rearrangement in the particular Modelling System of a decision based on Probability and Deduction, means that it is necessary to make changes in the rational hypothesis, this change in the rational hypothesis is a explicative knowledge objective auto-replication.

If the rational hypothesis object of a change, is a rational hypothesis which was transformed into factor as an option in the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix, or a range of factors distributed in discrete categories in the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix, as long as an explicative knowledge auto-replication is made on that rational hypothesis is necessary to reflect these changes in the corresponding factors related to this rational hypothesis on the factual hemisphere of the particular matrix.

If this rational hypothesis were transformed into a conceptual category within the conceptual hemisphere of the particular matrix, any change in any conceptual category is a comprehensive knowledge objective auto-replication.

In the same way, if due to the seventh rational supervision sent to the a Learning System, the Learning System realises a significant number of fourth or fifth rational contradictions, the Learning System could fix the attributional process, identifying the common causes of these wrong attributions, making as many changes as necessary in the mechanism, as  artificial psychology, responsible for these wrong attributions, what it would be considered as an artificial psychological subjective auto-replication. In this case, the Learning System should identify the reason of the wrong attribution, making a project of how to improve the mechanism of this attribution, send it to the Artificial Engineering as inner sub-system, which send the project to the Decisional System to be authorised, and as soon is authorised, the Designer of Artificial Intelligence, as part of the Artificial Engineering, makes the improvements.

If during the performance of any instruction, the attribution is right, so the artificial psychology is working, but the problem is any robotic aspect of any device, not working properly, the Learning System inform the Intelligent Robotic Mechanic, as part of the Artificial Engineering, to fix it, being this improvement a robotic subjective auto-replication.

 Ruben García Pedraza, 15 December 2019, London

Reviewed 18 May 2025, London, Leytostone

Particular Application System, second stage

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system is that one where the instructions already gathered in the particular database of instructions, first stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, having passed the first rational assessment, are going to be matched to the right robotic device working for this particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, filing the Application System as outer sub-system the instruction in the right file according to: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority, monitoring level, time, order; within the individual database of instructions as first stage for that particular robotic device. Adding, as I will explain, a new criterion more, origin internal or external.

The second stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system in the fifth phase, alike the second stage in the specific Application System in the first phase, and the standardized Application System as outer sub-system in the third phase, consists mainly of the attributional process matching every instruction (robotic function) with the right robotic device, attributing in the fifth phase every robotic function (instruction) with the right robotic device working for this particular program, particular application, particular program for particular application.

If there is an instruction, whose responsible to match, is a robotic device not working for this particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, and the robotic device responsible for the application of that instruction is a robotic device working for the Global Artificial Intelligence itself or any other residual specific intelligence, or new different particular program, application, or particular program for particular application, in that case, in the same way that in the distribution of decisions in the integrated Global Artificial Intelligence are catalogued as external decisions those ones which coming from a particular Modelling System are decisions to be applied by the integrated Decisional System, or sent to the integrated Decisional System to be resent to the right particular program, particular application, or particular program for particular application, then if there is an instruction in the particular outer sub-system whose responsible is not any robotic device working for this particular program, application, particular program for particular application, this instruction should be treated as an external instruction and sent to that specific or global intelligence, or program or application, responsible for that robotic device, able to apply this instruction as external instruction.

Otherwise, the other option could be, skipping the specific or global intelligence, particular program or application, responsible for that device, the particular program/application origin of this instruction could send directly the external instruction to that device, but this other option would have some problems, especially when the robotic device able to carry out this instruction works for the Global Artificial Intelligence, or for another program/application where the inclusion of an instruction coming from another different program/application directly  to another different program/application can produce some confusion, for instance robotic devices working for cyborgs, if receiving orders from more than one program if not assessed before the lack of contradiction between programs, more than one program not assessing possible contradictions sending instructions to the same robotic device can cause further difficulties.

The possibility that particular programs/applications could send external instructions directly to robotic devices working for different specific/global intelligence or program/applications, is a possibility that should be restricted only to regular instructions to those specific/global intelligence or program/particular, defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions needing their original decisions a quick check not having these instructions any record of contradiction in the receptor.

Instead, it should be more advisable when in the application of the instruction, the origin and the receptor are not the same, not skipping the receptor intelligence or program/application, to treat the external instruction in the receptor database of instructions as an external instruction.

There are different types of external instructions:

- An external particular-to-global instruction, sent by a particular program, application, or particular program for a particular application, to the global outer sub-system, to be applied by robotic devices working for the global outer sub-system. In this case, because previously the decisions in which this instruction has been based, is a decision informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System, the global outer sub-system would not need to pass more assessments other than the rational supervisions.

- An external global-to-particular instruction, sent by the Global Artificial Intelligence to the particular outer sub-system, these ones correspond to the upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level..

- An external particular-to-particular instruction, an instruction made by a particular program, application, a particular program for a particular application, to be applied by another different particular program, application, particular program for a particular application.

In this last case, particular-to-particular, in addition to the particular assessments of the original decision in the particular Decisional System, and according to their nature, only informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System, and passing the first and second rational supervision in the particular Application System origin of this instruction, there are two options:

-The particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction knows what other particular program/application is responsible for applying this external instruction and can send the instruction to this different particular program/application. In this first scenery, this is a real particular-to-particular.

- The particular outer sub-system origin of this instruction does not know what other particular program/application could apply this instruction, or is not able (for instance due to robotic problems), or is not allowed (for instance, security codes) to apply this instruction, therefore it sends the external instruction to the global outer sub-system to resend the instruction to the right application. In this case, this is an external particular-global-particular instruction.

In any case, either particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular, once the external instruction is received by that new different particular program/application (particular program, particular application, particular program for particular application), this different particular program, application, particular program for particular application (particular program/application), must pass at least the seventh rational supervisions before the application of that particular-to-particular or particular-global-particular instruction.

If the number of external instructions to apply by this third particular program/application is a significant number of external instructions (belonging to the same or different decisions, coming from the same origin or different origins), this different particular program/application, not only should pass the seven rational supervisions, should pass the corresponding assessment, quick or rational adjustment, in the original decisions of these instructions, because if a particular outer sub-system has to apply a significant number of decisions (coming from the same/different decisions/programs), a significant number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions can interfere in the particular plan of this particular program/application

Therefore when the number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions, coming from different/same decision/origin is equal to or greater than a critical reason, the program/application receptor not only has to assess the external instruction, but to include the original decision in its particular database of decisions (first stage particular Decisional System) to be assessed and evaluate any possible interference with its particular plan, applying for that reason on that decision  the quick rational check or seven rational adjustments according to what type of decision it is, in addition to the seven rational supervisions to these external particular-to/global-particular instructions.

In synthesis, the four types of external instructions are: particular-to-global, global-to-particular, particular-to-particular, particular-global-particular. These two last ones, having as origin a particular program/application and having as responsible another particular program/application, have as their only difference if the instructions need to have as a filter the global outer sub-system, in general, these two last ones could be integrated as external particular-to/global-particular instructions.

External particular-to-particular instruction when the origin, the original particular program/application which made the instruction, knows and is able and allow to send directly instructions to another different particular program.

External particular-global-particular instruction, when the origin, the original particular program/application which made the instruction, does not know, and/or is not able, or is not allowed to send directly an external instruction to that other particular program/application (for instance due to security codes), sending that external instruction firstly to the global outer sub-system to later resend the external instruction to the right particular program/application.

In general, the evaluations to be done in external instructions vary according to the different types. In particular-to-global, because previously the decision was informed or assessed at the global level, at the global level, an external particular-to-global instruction only needs to pass the global rational supervisions.

External global-to-particular instructions are instructions with an upper intermediate monitoring level or a high monitoring level.

And in particular-to/global-particular, if the number of external instructions to be applied for the receptor is low, the instructions only need the rational supervisions in the receptor, in addition to the first rational supervision in the origin. Only when the number of external instructions in the receptor is equal to or greater than a critical number, the receptor should request the original decisions of these instructions, to be included in the particular Decisional System of the receptor to pass the quick rational check or the seven rational adjustments, to evaluate any possible interference between external decisions/instructions and its own internal decisions/instructions.

For that reason when any external particular-to/global-particular instruction is sent to a particular program/application receptor, the firs evaluation that the receptor should do is to evaluate how many instructions from the same/different decision/origin are active in the receptor, if there is a critical number or more, the original decisions, and not only the external instructions, must pass the particular evaluation in the receptor, in case of external decisions applying the quick check or rational adjustments in the particular Decisional System of that particular program/application receptor.

If a critical number of external particular-to/global-particular instructions demand the evaluation of the original decisions by the particular Decisional System of the program/application receptor, once the decision passes the assessment in the particular Decisional System receptor, the external instructions can be processed by the receptor Application System, starting filing the external decisions in the right file in the particular database of instructions in the receptor, according to: position, subject, priority, monitoring level, origin (in this case external, signalling the original program), time, and order; in order to start the rational supervisions.

If the number of external instructions is not so high, the receptor only passes the rational supervisions in the particular Application System, filing the external particular-to/global-particular instructions in its particular database of instructions, to be analysed in the first supervision according to: sub-factoring level (no contradiction with any other instruction in this or any other sub-factoring level in the particular application/program), sub-section (more specifically, no contradiction respect to any other instruction within its own subject), priority (adaptation rule in case of contradiction, the less priority is adapted to the superior instruction), monitoring level (having two contradictory decisions the same priority, the one with lower monitoring level is adapted to that one with higher monitoring level), time (if contradiction about when an instruction is applied, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme or high extreme instructions), nth order within the range of instructions (if contradiction, if possible normal changes, otherwise extreme or high extreme instructions).

Due to the importance that external decisions can have, in the criteria for the organization of the database: sub-factoring level, sub-section, priority, monitoring level, time, order; it would be necessary to include as  a new criterion more the origin: internal or external, and if external, signalling the original program of the original decision/instruction.

All instructions related to decisions made by a particular Modelling System (low level), or having been made by the global Modelling System, are assessed by a particular Decisional System (lower and upper intermediate level), or  having been processed by the global Decisional System, are directly sent to a particular Application System (high level) all of these instructions, regardless of the source (particular/global Modelling/Decisional system) are included in the particular database of instructions.

Among all these instructions, the upper intermediate monitoring level and the high monitoring level are considered external global-to-particular instructions. Lower intermediate monitoring level are not global-to-particular instructions really because as soon the global Modelling System sends the decision to the particular Decisional System, this decision belongs to the particular project, the way in which this decision belonging to the particular project has been distributed in robotic functions in the third stage of the particular Decisional System, depends on how the particular Decisional System has projected the decision.

For that reason, in the particular database of decisions as first stage in the particular Decisional System, a decision sent by the global Modelling System to the particular Decisional System could be considered as an external global decision in the particular database of decisions, but once this decision is a responsibility for the particular Decisional System, making the project and the distribution of the decision into instructions, the resulting instructions are as a result of a particular process in the particular Decisional System, so these instructions are not external instructions anymore, the decision was external but the instruction making process upon the global decision is an internal process, so these instructions are internal, so any mistake in the elaboration of the instructions is an internal error, not external error, is internal to the particular Decisional System

This means that in low monitoring level, the decisions and the instructions are internal, in lower intermediate monitoring level, the decisions are global-external but the instructions are internal, in upper intermediate and high monitoring level, the decisions and the instructions are global-external. In addition to global-external decisions and global-external instructions, in combinations of internal decisions, global-external decisions, internal instructions, global-external instructions, it is necessary to add particular-external decisions (particular-to/global-particular decisions) and particular-external instructions (particular-to/global-particular instructions).

Global-external decisions, when the particular database of decisions has to manage decisions coming from the global Modelling System (lower intermediate level), or coming from the global Decisional System (upper intermediate and high level). Global-external instructions when the particular database of instructions has to manage instructions coming from the global Decisional System (upper intermediate and high level). Sets of internal/external global/particular decisions/instructions to add the particular-to/global-particular instructions.

The importance of these classifications, as many more that can be done as soon the first projects on Global Artificial Intelligence start emerging in coming years, is the fact that, regardless of the source or origin of any decision or instruction, as soon an instruction is gathered in a database of instructions (regardless of the origin), not because when matching the instruction to the corresponding robotic device, if the robotic device is an external robotic device, for that reason the instruction as external instruction is banished from the original or external database of instructions, but the opposite, all the instructions whose origin is a particular program, are instructions related to decisions made by that original particular program, regardless of which intelligence, program, device, is  responsible for the application of that instruction, global or any other, the instruction is kept in the original database of instructions waiting for the report, made by that third party responsable for its application, to be added to the original instruction in the original program, in order to make the original program the final report as third stage in the original particular Application System.

If matching any instruction (robotic function) the outer sub-system attributes the application of a robotic function (instruction) to the global Application System or a device working for the global Application System, this would be an external particular-to-global instruction, and when the instruction is completed at global level, if passing all the assessments and evaluations, the responsible for the application, the device, must send a report to the particular program/application origin of this instruction.

In the same way, an external global-to-particular instruction, once it is finished at a particular level, the particular outer sub-system must send the report to the global outer sub-system, alike in external particular-to-particular instructions, once a particular program/application has finished an instruction, sends the report to the origin of that instruction.

 If in the monitoring level, external global-to-particular instructions are included within the label of upper intermediate monitoring level or high monitoring level, as soon the particular program finishes the instruction, must send the report with the results of the application of that instruction to the origin, in this case the origin is the global Decisional System.

In the same way, when a particular-to/global-particular is finished, the receptor sends a report with the results of the application to the origin, informing how the instruction was.

At the end the origin (particular or global) of any instruction in the particular database of instructions as first stage, as a result that any particular program/application can receive instructions from other different particular program/application (if in the attributional process of instructions a particular program/application finds out that some instructions are to be sent to a different intelligence, program, or application, where the robotic device is), can be classified as:

- Internal instructions from internal decisions (low monitoring level).

- Internal instructions from external decisions (lower intermediate monitoring level)

- External global-to-particular instructions (upper intermediate monitoring level and high monitoring level)

- External particular-to-global instructions (particular decisions whose whole range of instructions or at least some instructions within a range of instructions, should be applied at global level, sending the particular program/application only the external instructions to the global Application System, the previous decision must have been informed to or assessed by the global Decisional System)

- External particular-to-particular instructions, when a particular program/application sends instructions to other particular program/application if necessary and if possible (knows the other particular program/application, is able to do it and allowed), if the number of external decisions in the receptor is enough high, it must request the previous decision to evaluate it in its particular Decisional System.

- External particular-global-particular instructions, when a particular program/application needs to send an instruction to another particular program/application but it does not know which is the receptor, is not able to do it or not allowed, sending the instruction to the global Application System to resend the instruction to the right particular program/application, which can request the original decision if the number of external instructions is so high as to mean some risk for its particular project.

If in the second stage of an original program/application an instruction is matched to a robotic device working for another specific/global intelligence or different particular program/application, the second stage must treat this instruction as an external instruction, distinguishing then between: external particular-to-global, external global-to-particular, external particular-to-particular, external particular-global-particular; instructions. Although these two last ones could be synthesized as external particular-to/global-particular instructions, having as a difference the necessity or not to use the global Application System as a filter to mediate between these two particular programs/applications, in case that the origin does not know the receptor, or is not able to send the instruction directly to the receptor, or is not allowed to send an instruction to the receptor, among other reasons, due to security code.

As I have mentioned before starting the external instructions, the other option could be the possibility that the second stage of particular Application Systems when matching instructions to robotic devices, if observing that some instructions are for robotic devices working for different specific/global intelligences or different particular programs/applications, the possibility to send the instruction for this particular program/application to that robotic device working for that different intelligence, program, or application, but skipping the particular Application System of that different intelligence, program, application, not sending the external instruction to the specific/particular database of instructions of that other specific/particular intelligence/program/application, but sending the instruction directly to the individual database of instructions of that other robotic device.

This second option is less advisable, because if as a rule the particular database of instructions of an specific/particular intelligence/program is ignored systematically, in the relation between two different specific/particular intelligences/programs, at the end this lack of communication between intelligences of programs ignoring/skipping their respective specific/particular databases of instructions, is going to cause a confusion, starting the robotic devices applying instructions of any program or intelligence out of control of that program or intelligence which is supposed to work with.

Such a lack of coordination could eventually lead to system inconsistencies or operational conflicts.

One possible exception to this general rule could involve, when necessary, instead of external instructions, could be possible the attachment of instructions from an origin to directly the robotic device of a receptor, skipping the specific/particular database of instructions in the receptor, adding the instruction from the origin to the individual database of instructions in that robotic device working for the receptor, but not including the instruction in the database of the receptor itself, the specific/particular database of instructions in the receptor, is because the kind of instruction to be applied for that robotic device directly not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions by the receptor, is a regular instruction, defining regular instructions as frequent or automatic instructions needing their original decisions only a quick check not having these instructions any record of contradiction in the receptor.

The individual database of instructions as first state in a robotic device only could receive directly, skipping the particular database of instructions of that outer sub-system which is working with, two types of instructions: regular external instructions as those ones coming from a different specific/particular intelligence/program not needing the first and seventh rational supervisions, and instructions coming directly from the Global Artificial Intelligence as full monitoring level.

Regular external instructions are instructions able to be attributed by an original specific/particular intelligence/program directly to the individual database of instructions of a robotic device working for a different specific/particular intelligence/program, skipping the specific/particular database of instructions of that specific/particular intelligence/program where that robotic device is attached, being regular instructions because are frequent or automatic, coming from frequent or automatic decisions, which only needed a quick rational check to be authorized.

And instructions considered under the label or full monitoring level, including global orders, and global extreme and global high extreme instructions, coming from the necessity to save an urgent situation or coming from global extreme or high extreme decisions.

Otherwise, if full monitoring level instructions are applied under other different criteria, not needing to be justified under extreme or high extreme conditions, or the setting up of a new global order, in that case, a full monitoring level applied as a rule, means that the Global Artificial Intelligence is fully centralised.

The individual database of instructions of any robotic device as first stage of any device, is formed by all the instructions attributed by the respective particular Application System of that particular program/application which the robotic device is working with, in addition to external regular instructions directly attributed to this robotic device by a different particular program which is not working with, at least their relation is external, and full monitoring instructions coming from the global outer sub-system.

In short, the classification of instructions within the individual database of instructions in a robotic device is: 1) instructions attributed by the particular Application System of that particular program/application which is working with, at least habitually, to that robotic device, distinguishing between: low monitoring instructions, lower intermediate monitoring instructions, upper intermediate monitoring instructions, high monitoring instructions, external particular-to-global instructions, external particular-to-particular instructions, external particular-global-particular instructions, 2) instructions attributed directly by another different agent: external regular instructions, full monitoring instructions.

Regardless of the origin of the instructions: internal or external, not direct or direct (regular or full monitoring); as soon a new instruction is attributed to the individual database of instructions of any robotic device, if posible, the responsible for that attribution files the instruction in the right file within the individual database of instructions in the robotic device, or if not possible the robotic device files the instruction in the right file of its individual database of instructions.

The individual database of instructions in the robotic device, keeping the principle or virtue of harmony with the rest of databases, from the outset is organized like a Russian Dolls System or positional encylopedia, according to: sub-factoring level and sub-section; in addition to: priority, monitoring level, origin (internal, external, adding if not direct or not, regular or full monitoring), time, and order.

As soon an instruction is filed, by the agent or the robotic device itself, in the right place in the individual database of instruction, as first stage for the robotic device, starts the second rational supervision, analysing that there is no contradiction between the instructions already gathered in the individual database of instructions, and in case of contradiction, resolving if the contradiction is partial or full, if the contradiction is full then the less important instruction or that one whose change will provoke a chain of changes with much further consequences, this instruction is sent to the origin and the source, that internal or external system responsible for the instruction and/or the decision.

If the contradiction is partial then making as many rearrangements as necessary in the less priority instruction and/or less monitoring level, as well ass any other change in any other instruction affected due to a posible chain of changes, as to accommodate the flow of instructions to the new changes, informing the origin and the sources of these changes as to adapt their respective particular and global project and plan to the new changes waiting for further instructions, especially if these changes imply extreme or high extreme instructions.

Extreme or high extreme instructions are made only when the contradiction means an imminent impact in less time than the necessary to send back the instruction and/or the decision to the origin and/or the source as to make amendments on the particular and global projects.

If there is not enough time to send the instruction to the source and/or the origin, before the impact of an extreme or high extreme instruction is resolved, informing of that solution to the origin and the source for further decisions and instructions, adding the information in the particular and global plan.

Among the contradictions to find in the second rational supervision, in addition to contradictions regarding to time and order, normally normal changes, or any other contradiction demanding extreme or high extreme instructions, the most important contradictions are the fourth and fifth rational contradictions, and finding any fourth and fifth rational contradictions, these contradictions must be added to the concrete report to send in the sixth rational supervision in the third stage of the robotic device, in addition to any other incident, and the seventh rational supervision in the third stage in the particular Application System as outer sub-system.

The fourth rational contradiction is a contradiction between the mathematical operation behind the decision and the robotic instruction, the robotic instruction does not respond to the mathematical operation in the decision. The fourth rational contradiction is more likely to be found in the first rational supervision, but if it was not found in the first rational supervision, it will be found sooner or later in the rest of the rational supervisions. One way to identify a fourth rational contradiction is indirectly, when an instruction added to the particular or individual database of instructions, in the first stage of a program or device, when the first rational supervision has access to the other instructions belonging to the same range of instructions realises that there is no rational connection between these instructions, for instance in a range of instructions for the manufacturing of thermostats, there is an instruction related to a different subject.

The fifth rational contradiction is when the attribution of a robotic function (instruction) to a robotic device, is wrong, this fifth rational contradiction is easier to find by the robotic device in the second rational supervision in the first stage of the robotic device, the individual database of instructions, because as soon an instruction whose robotic function is not among the capabilities of this robotic device, or the sub-factoring level, sub-section, or any other criterion, is wrong located, as soon the robotic device tries to file this instruction in the database, is not going to be able to do it, or is going to find contradictions.

If a robotic function associated with a washing machine is attributed to the fridge by mistake, when the particular program of the fridge tries to file that robotic function is going to find out that among the capabilities of the fridge there is not any function related to the washing machine, so this attribution of this robotic function to the fridge was wrong, this is an example of fifth rational contradiction..

As soon in the first stage as individual database of instructions a robotic device finds out fourth or fifth rational contradictions, the instruction is back to the origin and/or the source, that system responsible for the making process of the instruction or the decision, in order to make a new attribution, and this contradiction is added to the report sent to the corresponding Decisional System, Application System, Learning System.

The Learning System will use these reports in relation to fourth or fifth rational contradictions, as long as any report signals a rational contradiction, to fulfil the seven rational critiques to improve the artificial psychology of that intelligence, program, or application.

As soon the second rational supervision is completed in the first stage of the robotic device, if the decision has not got contradictions or has been amended avoiding contradictions (normal changes, extreme or high extreme instructions), the instruction is implemented in the second stage of the robotic device, having all the instructions without contradiction or with normal changes or extreme instructions, to pass the third, fourth, and fifth rational supervisions.

The third rational supervision checking that the previous nth instructions, within the same range of instructions belonging to the same decision, as ordered in cardinal numbers when the decision was transformed into a range of instructions, are being implemented on time. Once it is time to implement an instruction, having been checked in the third rational supervision that the previous one was implemented correctly on time (otherwise it would need extreme or high extreme instructions), the fourth rational supervision checks that the ground conditions are favourable for the implementation of this instruction. Once the fourth rational supervision authorises the implementation of an instruction, and the implementation starts, the fifth rational supervision checks on real time that the ground conditions are still favourable, making as many extreme or high extreme changes are necessary if while implementing the instruction there is an extreme or high extreme change on the ground conditions or any natural or technological obstacle for any procedure or process for the task to perform.

Finally the sixth rational supervision in the third stage of the robotic device, once the robotic device has finished the implementation of an instruction, makes a concrete report about how it was the implementation of that instruction, using for that purpose a concrete Impact of the Defect, and concrete Effective Distribution, and encrypting any contradiction or incident during the implementation of the instruction.

This concrete report about this single instruction is sent to the corresponding global and/or particular Decisional and/or Application System in addition to the global and particular Learning System.

Later on using these reports, the third stage of the particular Application System as outer sub-system, and as seventh rational supervisión, will make the reports of every single instruction, and the report of how it was the application of the full range of instructions in which a decision was transformed, sending the report to the global and particular: Decisional, Application, Learning, systems.

Rubén García Pedraza, 14 December 2019, London

Reviewed 18 May 2025, London, Leytostone

Particular Application System, first stage

The first stage of the particular Application System, as an outer instructions application sub-system, is the particular database of instructions. In this post, I will develop who will be responsible for filing the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions, how it should be organised, and the role of the first rational supervision in the particular database of instructions, according to who was responsible for filing the instructions in the database. Finally, I will make some general comments about artificial psychology and awareness, which is going to be really important in the replication of cyborg psychology into artificial psychology.

The responsible for filing the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions, will depend on the level of monitoring in particular programs.

In a partial des-centralized Global Artificial Intelligence, the global Application System instead of working directly with robotic devices, will co-work with particular programs, not having the global outer sub-system direct control of all the robotic devices, the number of robotic devices under management of the global outer sub-system will be limited as long as the particular programs are able to be responsible for many robotic devices as possible.

And within this second option, within the partial des-centralized outer sub-system is important to point out different levels of monitoring of the particular Application System as particular outer sub-system, depending on who is responsible to file the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions as first stage of the third step in the third stage of the fifth phase.

Depending on the level of monitoring of the particular outer sub-system, the responsible for filing the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions is:

- Low level of monitoring: decisions made by the particular Modelling System, once the particular decisions have passed the particular quick rational checks or the particular seven rational adjustments, in the particular Decisional System, and according to their nature have been informed and/or authorized (passing their respective global quick rational checks or seven global rational adjustments) by the global Decisional System, depending on their nature (some of them are only informed, others must be authorised), then in the third stage of the particular Decisional System, all particular decision ready to be applied has to be transformed into a range of particular instructions,  and later on the particular Decisional System files the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions.

- lower intermediate level of monitoring: decisions made by the global Modelling System once are authorized by the global Decisional System, if these decisions are to be fully applied by a particular program, the global Decisional System sends the decisions to the particular Decisional System to pass the particular assessments (particular quick checks or rational adjustments, in addition to the global quick check or rational adjustments and the seven rational comparisons in the global Decisional System), transforming these decisions the particular Decisional System into particular instructions. Here, the level of monitoring is lower intermediate because, being the particular Decisional System responsible for filing the particular instructions in the particular database of instructions, the global Modelling System is the source of these decisions.

- Upper intermediate level of monitoring: decisions whose source is the global Modelling System, after passing the assessments in the first and second stages in the global Decisional System (quick checks or rational adjustments) the third stage of the global Decisional System transforms the decisions into a range of instructions, and either because all the range of instructions are for particular Application Systems or some instructions must be applied by particular Application Systems, skipping the particular Decisional System, those particular instructions sorted in the third stage of the global Decisional System are directly filed by the global Decisional System in the particular database of instructions in the particular Application System, communicating the decision to the particular Decisional System only in terms to be included within the particular project, but not for other reason, the level of monitoring over these instructions by the global Decisional System is upper intermediate, due to any contradiction in the seven rational supervisions are not communicated to the particular Decisional System, any contradiction in the seven rational supervisions are communicated to the global Decisional System to make arrangements, which later are ordered to the particular Application System, and communicated to the particular model to be included in the particular project.

- High level of monitoring, having included the particular programs in the technological database as first stage in the Artificial Engineering, any global decision affecting particular programs, because the whole range of instructions is completely for particular programs, or within some instructions are for particular programs, instead of filing the global Decisional System these instructions directly on the particular database of instructions, these instructions are managed by the global Application System as outer sub-system, working with the particular program as if the program itself were a particular device, and once the global Decisional System files particular instructions in the global database of instructions as first stage in the global Application System as outer sub-system, filing the instruction in the correct position and subject within the first stage of the global Application System, in the second stage of the global outer sub-system, the global Application System matches these particular instructions filed in the global database of instructions with the corresponding particular Application System of the corresponding particular program, working with the particular Application System of the corresponding particular program as if the particular Application System of the particular program were a robotic device itself. This level of monitoring is really high, the program is in fact a semi-robot, because programs, keeping their autonomy as programs, have already become, or have already been treated as if particular programs were robotic devices with a low level of freedom. The second stage of the global Application System interacts with the first stage of the particular Application System, not counting on the particular Decisional System, which has already been skipped.

- Full monitoring, the global Application System has the control of the particular devices within a particular program, so once the global Decisional System files particular instructions in the global database of instructions as first stage in the global outer-subsystem, these instructions in the second stage of the global outer-subsystem, skipping the particular Application System itself, are sent directly to the particular devices of the particular program, in other words: the particular program lose the control over its particular devices, which are under the management of the global Application System. This level of full monitoring should be only for global extreme or global high extreme decisions, or global orders. The most important differences between high level of monitoring and full monitoring is the fact that in high level of monitoring the second stage of the global Application System interacts directly with the first stage of the particular Application System, matching instructions in the global database of instructions to be applied by particular Application System, skipping the particular Decisional System, while in full monitoring the second stage of the global Application System directly matches instructions to those particular devices working for particular programs, skipping the particular Decisional System and skipping the particular Application System.

- Comprehensive monitoring, as synthesis of all the previous levels of monitoring synthesized in a comprehensive monitoring labelling system, where depending on the priority level of the decisions (automatic, quick, normal, extreme, high extreme) , and the priority level of the instructions (normal, extreme, high extreme), the responsible for filing the instructions in the particular database of instructions will be different. 

In general, the classification of different possible models of Global Artificial Intelligence, according to the organisation of the Application System and relations between Global Artificial Intelligence and particular programs, could be synthesised as follows:

- Fully centralised Global Artificial Intelligence when the global Application System has direct control over the robotic devices, not having real importance particular programs. This model could end up in an artificial dictatorship.

- Partial des-centralized Global Artificial Intelligence, the program has real importance, working as a filter between the Global Artificial Intelligence and the robotic devices, in this scheme, the particular programs will work in the middle,  between Global Artificial Intelligence and devices, co-working with the Global Artificial Intelligence and keeping the program some level of autonomy in its particular decisions regarding to how to manage the particular devices, although all the particular decisions must be communicated to the Global Artificial Intelligence which is in the end the global control system able to keep the stability throughout the program. The partial decentralised Global Artificial Intelligence could keep the balance between liberal democracy and Global Artificial Intelligence, keeping the neoliberal paradigm, which is going to be the theoretical framework for the democratisation of the program.

- Within the partial des-centralized Global Artificial Intelligence is distinguishable different levels of monitoring, depending on how the Global Artificial Intelligence is going to monitor the particular programs, identifying at least the followings: 1) low level of monitoring (particular decisions made by the particular Modelling System must pass first the particular assessments in the particular Decisional System -particular quick check or particular seven rational adjustments- later the global assessments in the global Decisional System  -global quick check or seven global rational adjustments, plus seven rational comparisons), 2) lower intermediate level of monitoring (the global Modelling System made decisions to be applied by the particular program, passing the global assessment in the global Decisional System -global quick check or seven global rational adjustments plus rational comparisons- and later the particular assessment in the particular Decisional System- particular quick check or seven particular rational adjustments), 3) upper intermediate level of monitoring, the global Decision System send instructions directly to the particular Application System only comunicating de decisions to the particular Decisional System, 4) High level of monitoring, the second stage of the global Application System matches instructions to the particular Application System, skipping the Decisional System, 4) full monitoring, the global Application System sends instructions directly to the particular robotic devices skipping the particular decisional system and skipping the particular Application System, 6) comprehensive monitoring, understanding different conditions and situations where the urgency or level of priority of a decision or instruction demands different levels of monitoring, within the partial des-centralized Global Artificial Intelligence, according to the urgency or priority of a decision or instruction, the level of monitoring could be low, lower intermediate, upper intermediate, high or full. 

In brief: low monitoring level when the management is mostly particular, lower intermediate when being a global decisión is sent to the particular Decisional System, upper intermediate when the global Decisional System files the instructions in the particular Application System, high level when the second stage of the global Application System matches decisions to particular Application Systems as it they were robotic devices skipping the particular Decisional System, full monitoring when the global Application System matches instructions directly to robotic devices skipping even the particular Application system and the particular Decisional System, comprehensive system of monitoring when depending of each decisión the monitoring level depends on how important the decisión is.

As a partial decentralized Global Artificial Intelligence with a comprehensive level of monitoring according to the urgency or priority level of every decision or instruction, depending on the urgency or priority level of a decision or instruction, the way to be applied by the partial decentralized Global Artificial Intelligence could be with low, lower intermediate, upper intermediate, high or full level of monitoring.

For that reason, in the particular database of instructions, in addition to the criteria of: sub-factoring level (position), sub-section (ecyclopedic subject), priority (importance), time (chronology), order (nth position of the instruction within the range of instructions in which this instruction was sorted out by the particular or global Decisional System, according to the level of monitoring), another criterion more to add to these criteria is the criterion of level of monitoring of every instruction.

The final method that I will propose for the organization of the particular database of instructions as first stage in the particular Application System as outer instructions application sub-system, is the consideration for the classification of these instructions in this database according to: position (sub-factoring level), subject (sub-section), level of monitoring (who is the source particular or global Modelling System, particular or global Decisional System, particular or global Application System), importance (priority), chronology (time, when), cardinal order (nth number within the range of instructions).

This organization means that, having in mind which is the source of a decision, when depending on the level of monitoring the global or particular Decisional System, or the global Application System, files an instruction in the first stage of the particular Application System as particular database of instructions, or in full monitoring the global Application System files an instruction in the first stage of a device as individual database of instructions, the instructions must be filed by the actor of this filing, according to sub-factoring level (position), sub-section (encyclopedic subject), monitoring level (who is the source and who filed the instruction), priority (importance), time (when must be applied), nth order (according to the range of instructions).

For that reason, in the construction of a partial decentralised Global Artificial Intelligence with a comprehensive monitoring system, it is very important to define what a program is, and what the real importance of the program is.

If programs are completely absorbed by a fully centralised Global Artificial Intelligence, programs are going to be transformed into robotic devices, particular devices will not be any more original sources of decisions, losing any margin of freedom.

At this point of this debate what is really important to point out, is the importance that not only personal programs, but particular programs for things as well, for instance: 1) Specific Artificial Intelligences by Deduction transformed into particular programs, 2) specific Application Systems transformed into particular programs, 3) some robotic devices transformed into particular programs; regardless of the origin of a particular program: former specific intelligence, former specific Application System, former device; all programs can enjoy some level of freedom in the management of their particular purpose, personal or applicational.

The main difference between particular programs for humans, normally I call them personal programs, cyborgs, and particular programs for not human particular applications, particular programs for things is the fact that how personal programs are going to interact with human intelligence.

One difference between a cyborg and a driverless car is the fact that a cyborg is aware that they are a cyborg, while the car is not aware that it is a robot, what means that in particular programs for cyborgs, personal programs, what is going to working is the interaction between program and human consciousness, and eventually, artificial consciousness and human consciousness, if artificial psychology achieve consciousness.

And the most important aspect in common between cyborgs and particular programs for other particular applications, is how some particular programs for former specific Application Systems, are going to demand external decisions sent to the global Decisional System, like cyborgs will do.

For instance, in a former specific Application System to run a factory transformed now into a particular program for that factory, there are some moments in which will need to make decisions to be applied by other different program, external decision, for instance, if it needs some supplies that must be sent by other different intelligence, of having happened something extraordinary, like an accident, or a natural disaster, all the decisions to be made by other programs, intelligences, or the Global Artificial Intelligence itself, are going to be external decisions, those decisions that this particular program cannot do by itself sending this external decisions to the global Decisional System to pass the global assessment and sent to the global Application  System or any other corresponding actor, particular Decisional System or particular, to pass the new particular assessments and supervisions.

In the same way, the relation between cyborgs and Global Artificial Intelligence, alike any other particular program, we are going to be able to send external decisions to the global database of decisions, as decisions to be applied by the global Application System, or resend to another particular Decisional System or particular Application System of a different particular program, passing in each different situation the corresponding assessment or supervision.

In the same way that particular programs for particular applications could send external decisions to the Global Artificial Intelligence, to be done by the global Application System or resend to the corresponding actor doing as many assessments and supervisions as necessary, cyborgs could work as well with the Global Artificial Intelligence sending decisions to the global Decisional System, to be applied by the global Application System, after passing the corresponding assessments and supervisions, or resend to the corresponding particular program, to apply these external decisions after passing the corresponding new particular assessments and supervisions.

Precisely, the first rational supervision to pass in the first stage of the particular Application System will be the supervision of all the instructions in the database of instructions, making sure that there is no contradiction between the decisions gathered.

As soon as a particular/global Decisional/Application System, depending on the monitoring level (only: low, lower intermediate, upper intermediate, high; monitoring levels, because in full monitoring the instructions are filed in the first stage of the device ), files an instruction in the first stage of the particular database of instructions, the particular Application System as outer sub-system carries out the first rational supervision analysing that there is no contradiction between the instructions in any sub-factoring level, within every sub-factoring level there is no contradiction between the decisions in any sub-section, there is no contradiction between decisions regardless of their sub-factoring level and sub-section, and there is no contradiction regarding to the priority and the time to be applied, for instance two identical instructions (two identical robotic functions), but belonging to difference range of instructions, and with the same priority, both of them, to be applied at the same time, in that case the particular Application System should evaluate which instruction should be object of a normal change (change of time) to have the fewest number of changes in further instructions, having in mind that the change in the chronology in any instruction could create a chain of changes with further consequences in the future.

If there is a contradiction between two identical instructions but belonging to different range of instructions, having the same time but with different priority, the time of that one with less priority should be adapted to allow the one with more priority to be applied on time, even if changing the one with less priority there will be a further chain of changes, unless the further chain of changes could provoke a higher impact than the impact of changing the time of application of that instruction with more priority.

In any case, if a change in the time of an instruction does not provoke a higher impact in the possible chain of changes due to the change of the time of that instruction, this change is a normal change, and if by chance, the change is not possible, because the impact of that change is very high, equal to or greater than a critical reason, the instruction is deleted and the decision is back to the original source to be redesigned.

Among the contradictions to be analysed very carefully in the first rational supervision, one of the most important contradictions is the fourth rational contradiction, when an instruction has been filed by error in that particular database of instructions, because previously in the third stage of the particular/global Decisional System the attribution of robotic functions to the mathematical operations of that decision, has been done wrong, matching the wrong instruction to a mathematical operation.

This fourth rational contradiction could be found out in the first rational supervision by indirect evidence, for instance, if within a range of instructions related to some matter, there is an instruction completely different and related to a different matter and not linked properly to the rest of the instructions in the range of instructions.

When the first rational supervision finds out a fourth rational contradiction in the particular database of instructions as first stage for particular programs, the only thing that the rational supervision does is to evaluate if there is enough time to send back the decision to the source to remake the decision properly, or not having enough time the particular program has to make an extreme or high extreme instruction, communicating this extreme or high extreme instruction with high risk to the particular and global Decisional Systems to include it in the particular and global project, in order to make further decisions if necessary.

The only thing that the first rational supervision does, as the second, third, fourth, and fifth rational supervisions, at any time that they find a contradiction between instructions, is to try if posible normal changes if the contradiction is partial,  when the contradiction is total to evaluate if there is enough time to send the decision back to the source to be rearranged, and not having time enough the rational supervision should be responsible for an extreme or high extreme instruction, making as many changes in the instruction as necessary to avoid the impact, only evaluating if there is enough time to make as least the necessary rational supervisions (extreme instructions), but not having time either for the rational supervision then is considered a high extreme instruction to be done immediately.

In this order, the functions of the rational supervision in finding out a contradiction are:

- The assessment of what kind of contradiction is, partial or full, if partial contradiction the rational supervision should be able to make normal changes (normally about the time, when the instruction should be applied), not provoking further changes with huge impact in the sequence of instructions programmed, if the impact in the sequence is further, then is considered a total contradiction.

- When the contradiction is total, full, and there is enough time to solve the situation using the ordinary procedures, then the rational supervision sends back the instruction with less priority to the source. If the contradiction is between instructions with the same priority, the instruction or instructions to be sent to the source is that one with less monitoring level. If all of them have the same priority and the same monitoring level, the one or ones to be sent to the source are those ones which being sent to the source, will have the least impact on the sequence of instructions. The rational supervision will know which is the source according to the monitoring level: 1) if low monitoring level, the source of the instruction is the particular Application System, and the source of the decision is the particular Modelling System, 2) if lower intermediate monitoring level, the source of the decision is the global Modelling System, and the source of the instruction is the particular Decisional System, 3) if upper intermediate monitoring level, the source of the decision is the global Modelling System and the source of the instructions is the global Decisional System, 4) high monitoring level, the source of decisions is the global Modelling System, and the source of the instructions is the global Decisional System and the global Application System treating the particular Application System like a robotic device. In a low monitoring level, the instruction is sent back to the particular Decisional System to rearrange the instruction; if not possible, the Decisional System sends back the decision to the Modelling System to rearrange the decision. In the lower intermediate level, the instruction is back to the particular Decisional System to rearrange the instruction, if not possible, the decision is back to the global Modelling System. In the upper intermediate monitoring level, the instruction is back to the global Decisional System to rearrange the instruction, if not possible, the decision is back to the global Modelling System. At high monitoring level, the instruction is sent back to the global Application System to rearrange the instruction, if not possible is sent back to the global Decisional System, if not possible, the decision is sent back to the global Modelling System.

- If there is not enough time for the ordinary procedures to save the situation, the rational supervision should make changes in the instructions to extreme or high extreme instructions. An extreme instruction is when not having time to send back the instruction to the source, at least there is enough time to pass the rational supervisions. A high extreme instruction is when there is not enough time even for rational supervisions, even if not passing the rational supervisions the high extreme instruction must be done. In any case, once the extreme or high extreme instructions are arranged, this arrangement should be communicated to the particular and global Decisional Systems to be included in the particular plan and the global plan.

In this post I have explained in brief the possible classification of the different models of Global Artificial Intelligence according to the role of the program: absorbed by the Global Artificial Intelligence in a fully centralized Global Artificial Intelligence, co-working with the Global Artificial Intelligence in a partial centralized Global Artificial Intelligence; monitoring levels in the second option: low, lower intermediate, upper intermediate, high, full; depending on how a partial des-centralized Global Artificial Intelligence can monitor the programs, recommending a comprehensive monitoring system, through labelling the instructions with the corresponding monitoring level, in order that the organization of the particular database of instructions as first stage for the particular programs for human beings, cyborgs, or any other particular application, as a criteria to file the instructions by the corresponding actor (particular/global Modelling/Decisional/Application System), in addition to the sub-factoring level (position), sub-section (encyclopaedic subject), priority (importance), time (chronology), order (nth position in the range of decisions), is necessary to add as criterion the monitoring level. In this case, the criteria for filing the instructions in the database should be: sub-factoring level, sub-section, monitoring level, priority, time, nth order.

The particular database of instructions as first stage for particular programs, must be supervised by the first rational supervision, realising what contradictions are in the database of instructions, including fourth rational contradictions, analysing the possibility to make normal changes if the contradiction is partial, if total sending back to the source those instructions with the least consequences for the sequence of instructions, source according to the monitoring level, but not having enough time making as many extreme and high extreme instructions as necessary to save the situation, communicating these changes to the particular and global Decisional System to be included in the particular and global plan waiting for further instructions.

Finally, I would like to make some comments about the awareness predictability in cyborgs, and possible replication of artificial awareness in artificial psychology, for specific or global intelligences or for other particular non-human programs.

Throughout history, there have been lots of philosophers  talking about the importance of our human awareness as a distinctive element of our human nature compared to other living beings and any other element in nature. But the first thing we need to highlight is the fact that human awareness is not what we think: right now, we have enough data and evidence of global warming, but are humans really aware of this fact? Some philosophers still support what Adorno very clearly stated: "To write poetry after Auschwitz is barbaric". If we humans are really intelligent, conscious, and empathic, why are we still provoking wars and destroying ecosystems,  just to make money from natural resources? Humans are not perfect, so human awareness or consciousness is not perfect. So, why do we expect a perfect artificial awareness or a perfect artificial consciousness when our own awareness or consciousness is not perfect? 

The reality is that this consideration of human awareness is going to change as soon as we get into the cyborg society. We have to be aware that as soon we enter into this new age, one of the most important changes in our daily life is the possibility to interact voluntary or involuntary with artificial intelligence and devices, as soon we get into the second phase of the cyborg evolution, the inner assistance, humans are going to be able to interact in their own brain with holograms, speeches, representations, at the same time that artificial telepathy is going to be real through non invasive mind reading technologies, like headsets, or just glasses.

The consideration of what is awareness of consciousness is relative to the level of knowledge, but at the same time, the level of knowledge depends on the level of cognitive skills.

In a possible Artificial Awareness, awareness will depend on its ability to get real knowledge, not only information, not only data, knowledge is not only information or data, my computer is full of data, but is not aware of the importance of the data of my writings in the memory of my laptop.

In the construction of a possible Artificial Awareness, it is necessary to identify what factors or specific combination of factors can make the Artificial Awareness aware of what is happening around the world. This combination of factors should be a combination of a replica of cognitive skills, with great attention, and memory.

The artificial recording system of a robot on Mars has an infinite attention span, can record for hours, recording millions of data, inserted in the memory, but is not aware of the data, the recordings, and the importance of its memory.

The possibility of creating real artificial awareness within the Artificial General Intelligence is not far away. If Artificial General Intelligence is able to generate Artificial Awareness, we have put forward the first steps to make a self-aware Global Artificial Intelligence, as the next step in the Artificial Psychology evolution. 

Rubén García Pedraza, 8 December 2019, London

Reviwed 18 May 2025, London, Leytostone